Bogoliubov Excitations of Inhomogeneous Bose-Einstein ...
Bogoliubov Excitations of Inhomogeneous Bose-Einstein ...
Bogoliubov Excitations of Inhomogeneous Bose-Einstein ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Disorder<br />
The quadratic terms have been absorbed as phase factors in<br />
˜E(x) = e −i k L<br />
2L x 2<br />
e −ikLL E(r) and ˜η(x ′ ) = e i k L<br />
2L x ′2<br />
η(x ′ ). (3.5)<br />
The mixed term in (3.4) connects ˜ E(x) and ˜η(x ′ ) as a Fourier transform.<br />
Up to a complex phase, the field (3.1) is identified as the Fourier transform<br />
<strong>of</strong> the random field ˜η(x ′ ), evaluated at k = kLx/L. Accordingly, the Fourier<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the field ˜ Ek are given by the random field ˜η(x ′ ) evaluated at<br />
x ′ = −Lk/kL. The Fourier components inherit all statistical properties<br />
from the surface <strong>of</strong> the diffusor:<br />
˜E ∗ k ˜ E k ′ ∝ ˜η ∗ (−Lk/kL)˜η(−Lk ′ /kL) ∝ δ(k − k ′ )Θ(σ −1 − |k|), (3.6)<br />
with the disorder correlation length σ = L/(RkL). As only the intensity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the electric fields is relevant for the light-shift potential [see below], we<br />
identify E with ˜ E in the following. In terms <strong>of</strong> the average intensity in the<br />
plane <strong>of</strong> observation I0 = |E(x)| 2 , the field correlator reads<br />
E ∗ k E k ′ = (2πσ)d<br />
Vol(d) I0 Θ(1 − kσ) (2π) d δ(k − k ′ ) =: γ(k)(2π) d δ(k − k ′ ), (3.7)<br />
which defines the so-called complex degree <strong>of</strong> coherence γ(k) [23]. Here,<br />
Vol(d) is the volume <strong>of</strong> the d-dimensional unit sphere. All modes with<br />
k < 1/σ = RkL/L are statistically independent with a common Gaussian<br />
probability distribution.<br />
3.1.2. Generalization to 3D<br />
In the preceding derivation <strong>of</strong> the speckle correlations, a two-dimensional or<br />
one-dimensional diffusor plate and a corresponding plane <strong>of</strong> observation was<br />
considered (figure 3.2). The third dimension was needed for the distance L<br />
between both. How can this setup be generalized to three dimensions? Also<br />
in the third dimension, the speckle field has a certain grain size, but this<br />
axial correlation length is typically an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude longer [66, 67].<br />
Such a 3D speckle field with an anisotropic correlation function has been<br />
used e.g. in an experiment on the 3D <strong>Bose</strong>-Hubbard model [117]. There, the<br />
transverse correlation length was shorter than the lattice spacing, and the<br />
axial correlation length was <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> the lattice spacing. In a lattice,<br />
variations on a scale shorter than the lattice spacing do not matter, so the<br />
disorder was effectively uncorrelated in all three dimensions, fulfilling the<br />
demands <strong>of</strong> the disordered <strong>Bose</strong>-Hubbard problem.<br />
60