Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links

Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links

athene.bibl.unibw.muenchen.de
from athene.bibl.unibw.muenchen.de More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

Orbit ComputationInter Satellite LinksRadial [m] Along Track [m] Cross Track [m]7 x 7 0 0 05 x 5 0 0.01 02 x 2 6.2 14.8 0.8J2-Propagator (2 x 0) 4.4 18.5 0.7Kepler (0 x 0) 786 763 0.3JGM-2 (70 x 70) 0 0 0GEM-T3 (50 x 50) 0.44 0.58 0GRIM4-S4 (66 x 66) 0.26 0.3 0Deviated JGM-3 0 0 0Table 4-10 GEO 6 hoursAnother interesting fact is that the model uncertainties are negligible, especially if comparedto the LEO orbit. This is due to the fact that the uncertainties of the lower order harmonicscompared to their magnitude are far smaller than those of the higher order harmonics.It is clear that the GEO orbit, due to the fact the it has a non inclined orbit and see's always thesame part of the gravity field is subjected to extreme low perturbation from the higher orderharmonics. A more general class of orbits, the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) has thesame revolution period (and therefore orbit altitude) as the GEO. The error introduced to anIGSO orbit by neglecting higher order harmonics shows similar tendencies as for the GEOorbit. The IGSO is slightly more affected by tesseral and sectorial harmonics than the GEO,due to its inclined orbit. But also for this orbit class a 9 x 9 gravity model is sufficient.Page 46R. Wolf

Inter Satellite LinksOrbit Computation4.3.2 Third Body Attraction (Direct Tidal Effects)Figure 4-3 and Figure 4-4 show the orbit errors arising from neglecting the lunar attraction.All orbit errors show a oscillating characteristic with the along track error being superimposedby a linear trend.100Orbit Error [m]-10-20-30-40RadialAlong TrackCross Track-5019:12:30.000 01:52:30.000 08:32:30.000UTC [hours:minutes:seconds]Figure 4-3 Orbit Error of LEO 1250 km neglecting Lunar AttractionR. Wolf Page 47

<strong>Orbit</strong> Computation<strong>Inter</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Links</strong>Radial [m] Along Track [m] Cross Track [m]7 x 7 0 0 05 x 5 0 0.01 02 x 2 6.2 14.8 0.8J2-Propagator (2 x 0) 4.4 18.5 0.7Kepler (0 x 0) 786 763 0.3JGM-2 (70 x 70) 0 0 0GEM-T3 (50 x 50) 0.44 0.58 0GRIM4-S4 (66 x 66) 0.26 0.3 0Deviated JGM-3 0 0 0Table 4-10 GEO 6 hoursAnother interesting fact is that the model uncertainties are negligible, especially if comparedto the LEO orbit. This is due to the fact that the uncertainties of the lower order harmonicscompared to their magnitude are far smaller than those of the higher order harmonics.It is clear that the GEO orbit, due to the fact the it has a non inclined orbit <strong>and</strong> see's always thesame part of the gravity field is subjected to extreme low perturbation from the higher orderharmonics. A more general class of orbits, the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) has thesame revolution period (<strong>and</strong> therefore orbit altitude) as the GEO. The error introduced to anIGSO orbit by neglecting higher order harmonics shows similar tendencies as for the GEOorbit. The IGSO is slightly more affected by tesseral <strong>and</strong> sectorial harmonics than the GEO,due to its inclined orbit. But also for this orbit class a 9 x 9 gravity model is sufficient.Page 46R. Wolf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!