Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Orbit ComputationInter Satellite LinksRadial [m] Along Track [m] Cross Track [m]7 x 7 0 0 05 x 5 0 0.01 02 x 2 6.2 14.8 0.8J2-Propagator (2 x 0) 4.4 18.5 0.7Kepler (0 x 0) 786 763 0.3JGM-2 (70 x 70) 0 0 0GEM-T3 (50 x 50) 0.44 0.58 0GRIM4-S4 (66 x 66) 0.26 0.3 0Deviated JGM-3 0 0 0Table 4-10 GEO 6 hoursAnother interesting fact is that the model uncertainties are negligible, especially if comparedto the LEO orbit. This is due to the fact that the uncertainties of the lower order harmonicscompared to their magnitude are far smaller than those of the higher order harmonics.It is clear that the GEO orbit, due to the fact the it has a non inclined orbit and see's always thesame part of the gravity field is subjected to extreme low perturbation from the higher orderharmonics. A more general class of orbits, the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) has thesame revolution period (and therefore orbit altitude) as the GEO. The error introduced to anIGSO orbit by neglecting higher order harmonics shows similar tendencies as for the GEOorbit. The IGSO is slightly more affected by tesseral and sectorial harmonics than the GEO,due to its inclined orbit. But also for this orbit class a 9 x 9 gravity model is sufficient.Page 46R. Wolf
Inter Satellite LinksOrbit Computation4.3.2 Third Body Attraction (Direct Tidal Effects)Figure 4-3 and Figure 4-4 show the orbit errors arising from neglecting the lunar attraction.All orbit errors show a oscillating characteristic with the along track error being superimposedby a linear trend.100Orbit Error [m]-10-20-30-40RadialAlong TrackCross Track-5019:12:30.000 01:52:30.000 08:32:30.000UTC [hours:minutes:seconds]Figure 4-3 Orbit Error of LEO 1250 km neglecting Lunar AttractionR. Wolf Page 47
- Page 11 and 12: Inter Satellite LinksFigure 6-38 Tr
- Page 13 and 14: Inter Satellite LinksList of Tables
- Page 15 and 16: Inter Satellite LinksJ2Earths Oblat
- Page 17 and 18: Inter Satellite LinksIntroduction1
- Page 19 and 20: Inter Satellite LinksIntroductionGE
- Page 21 and 22: Inter Satellite LinksISL Observatio
- Page 23 and 24: Inter Satellite LinksState Estimati
- Page 26 and 27: State EstimationInter Satellite Lin
- Page 28 and 29: State EstimationInter Satellite Lin
- Page 30 and 31: State EstimationInter Satellite Lin
- Page 32 and 33: State EstimationInter Satellite Lin
- Page 34 and 35: State EstimationInter Satellite Lin
- Page 36 and 37: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 38 and 39: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 40 and 41: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 42 and 43: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 44 and 45: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 46 and 47: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 48 and 49: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 50 and 51: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 52 and 53: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 54 and 55: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 56 and 57: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 58 and 59: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 60 and 61: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 64 and 65: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 66 and 67: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 68 and 69: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 70 and 71: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 72 and 73: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 74 and 75: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 76 and 77: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 78 and 79: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 80 and 81: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 82 and 83: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 84 and 85: Orbit ComputationInter Satellite Li
- Page 86 and 87: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 88 and 89: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 90 and 91: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 92 and 93: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 94 and 95: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 96 and 97: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 98 and 99: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 100 and 101: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 102 and 103: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 104 and 105: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 106 and 107: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 108 and 109: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 110 and 111: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
<strong>Orbit</strong> Computation<strong>Inter</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Links</strong>Radial [m] Along Track [m] Cross Track [m]7 x 7 0 0 05 x 5 0 0.01 02 x 2 6.2 14.8 0.8J2-Propagator (2 x 0) 4.4 18.5 0.7Kepler (0 x 0) 786 763 0.3JGM-2 (70 x 70) 0 0 0GEM-T3 (50 x 50) 0.44 0.58 0GRIM4-S4 (66 x 66) 0.26 0.3 0Deviated JGM-3 0 0 0Table 4-10 GEO 6 hoursAnother interesting fact is that the model uncertainties are negligible, especially if comparedto the LEO orbit. This is due to the fact that the uncertainties of the lower order harmonicscompared to their magnitude are far smaller than those of the higher order harmonics.It is clear that the GEO orbit, due to the fact the it has a non inclined orbit <strong>and</strong> see's always thesame part of the gravity field is subjected to extreme low perturbation from the higher orderharmonics. A more general class of orbits, the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) has thesame revolution period (<strong>and</strong> therefore orbit altitude) as the GEO. The error introduced to anIGSO orbit by neglecting higher order harmonics shows similar tendencies as for the GEOorbit. The IGSO is slightly more affected by tesseral <strong>and</strong> sectorial harmonics than the GEO,due to its inclined orbit. But also for this orbit class a 9 x 9 gravity model is sufficient.Page 46R. Wolf