Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter Satellite Links7.4.1 User Position Error due to Normal Orbit and Clock DegradationTo evaluate the effect of orbit and clock degradation, a user at positionLatitude: 48 °Longitude: 11 °(Munich) has been assumed, which computes his position using all satellites in view(approximately 12 SV). The satellites positions are computed using the derived broadcastparameters. The broadcast clock parameters have not been computed, but are assumed to beapplied as well. Thus only the residual degradation effect has been modelled by random walkon the frequency and the resulting error has been added to the range.In the following simulation, no integrity monitoring takes place. The predicted and uploadedbroadcast ephemeris, as well as the clock are subject to degradation. The following threefigures show examples of the true orbit and clock error due to ageing.Radial Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5956.028.00-28.0-56.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5942.021.0-21.00-42.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Cross Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5966.033.0-33.00-66.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Clock Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:59496.0248.0-248.00-496.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Figure 7-3 Orbit and Clock Degradation of SV 26Page 168R. Wolf
Inter Satellite LinksAutonomous Onboard ProcessingRadial Error [cm] 1998 07 01 13:10 - 1998 07 02 11:5976.0-76.00[h]4 8 12 16 20Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 13:10 - 1998 07 02 11:59105.0-105.00[h]4 8 12 16 20Cross Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 13:10 - 1998 07 02 11:5964.0-64.00[h]4 8 12 16 20Clock Error [cm] 1998 07 01 13:10 - 1998 07 02 11:59368.0-368.00[h]4 8 12 16 20Figure 7-4 Orbit and Clock Degradation of SV 15R. Wolf Page 169
- Page 134 and 135: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 136 and 137: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 138 and 139: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 140 and 141: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 142 and 143: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 144 and 145: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 146 and 147: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 148 and 149: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 150 and 151: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 152 and 153: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 154 and 155: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 156 and 157: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 158 and 159: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 160 and 161: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 162 and 163: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 164 and 165: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 166 and 167: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 168 and 169: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 170 and 171: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 172 and 173: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 174 and 175: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 176 and 177: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 178 and 179: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 180 and 181: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 182 and 183: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 186 and 187: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 188 and 189: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 190 and 191: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 192 and 193: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 194 and 195: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 196 and 197: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 198 and 199: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 200 and 201: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 202 and 203: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 204 and 205: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 206 and 207: ReferencesInter Satellite Linksinte
- Page 208 and 209: ReferencesInter Satellite Linkshalf
- Page 210: ReferencesInter Satellite LinksSan
Autonomous Onboard Processing<strong>Inter</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Links</strong>7.4.1 User Position Error due to Normal <strong>Orbit</strong> <strong>and</strong> Clock DegradationTo evaluate the effect of orbit <strong>and</strong> clock degradation, a user at positionLatitude: 48 °Longitude: 11 °(Munich) has been assumed, which computes his position <strong>using</strong> all satellites in view(approximately 12 SV). The satellites positions are computed <strong>using</strong> the derived broadcastparameters. The broadcast clock parameters have not been computed, but are assumed to beapplied as well. Thus only the residual degradation effect has been modelled by r<strong>and</strong>om walkon the frequency <strong>and</strong> the resulting error has been added to the range.In the following simulation, no integrity monitoring takes place. The predicted <strong>and</strong> uploadedbroadcast ephemeris, as well as the clock are subject to degradation. The following threefigures show examples of the true orbit <strong>and</strong> clock error due to ageing.Radial Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5956.028.00-28.0-56.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5942.021.0-21.00-42.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Cross Track Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:5966.033.0-33.00-66.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Clock Error [cm] 1998 07 01 12:17 - 1998 07 02 11:59496.0248.0-248.00-496.0[h]4 8 12 16 20Figure 7-3 <strong>Orbit</strong> <strong>and</strong> Clock Degradation of SV 26Page 168R. Wolf