Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter Satellite Links7 AUTONOMOUS ONBOARD PROCESSING7.1 Why Onboard Processing?In a typical conventional orbit estimation process, ranging signals are transmitted by thesatellite whereas measurements are taken by the ground stations. There are two exceptions,the DORIS and the PRARE system: both systems are performing measurements onboard.• PRARE uses two way the range and range rate measurements in the X-band withphase coherent ground transponders. It has four channels; therefore it is limited to foursimultaneous measurements. Moreover, due to the fact that the transponders are phasecoherent and X band frequencies require directive antennae, the ground transponderscan serve only one satellite at a time. Although PRARE is used for orbit heightsbetween 500 and 2000 km, it is principally not limited to a special orbit class. Duringthe AUNAP project (1996) PRARE has been evaluated as an option for anautonomous navigation processor onboard an IGSO satellite.• DORIS receives codeless carrier signals on two frequencies (S-band and UHF) fromso called ground beacons and performs Doppler 1 measurements. Because range ratemeasurements are independent of the clock offset, one “Master Beacon” transmits akind of ranging code, which is needed to perform at least coarse synchronisation of theonboard clocks. Doppler measurements allow precise orbit estimation if the satellitedynamics are high, therefore it is more or less restricted to LEO orbits.Nevertheless, even in those systems the measurements are downloaded and transmitted viadata link to a central facility for further processing. In navigation applications like GPS andGLONASS, the central processing facility performs then orbit determination, orbit predictionand broadcast ephemeris adjustment.But given the fact that measurements are available, onboard processing has some advantages.The data latency can be reduced to a minimum. Therefore it is best suited for applicationswere fast reaction is desired. In navigation applications, the following four parameters are ameasure for the performance of a system:• Accuracy• Availability• Continuity of Service• IntegrityThe first two parameters are driven by the system’s design. Accuracy is mainly driven by twofactors, the radio frequency link (signal-in-space) and the broadcast ephemeris, and can beenhanced e.g. by1 Although DORIS performs no ranging but Doppler measurements, the two frequencies are needed to correctfor ionospheric effects, which are in fact an issue due to 10 seconds integration time. Because of this longintegration time, it would be more appropriate to speak of phase rate instead of Doppler measurements.Page 152R. Wolf
Inter Satellite LinksAutonomous Onboard Processing• providing two frequencies to allow ionospheric corrections• increasing chipping rate on the ranging signal• increasing update rates of broadcast ephemeris• using accurate broadcast models / short fit intervals• using accurate clocksAvailability, especially with respect to visibility of enough S/V to perform navigation, isdriven by constellation design, and can be enhanced by• putting enough S/V into service (actives, as well as spares and replenishment)• choosing benign orbits with respect to visibilityThe last two parameters are a bit more critical. They are mainly driven by reliability of thespace vehicles and environmental influences degrading the signal-in-space like RFinterference, atmospheric effects or jamming. Keeping these parameters high is of utmostinterest for civil aviation.System inherent continuity and integrity of the two existing navigation systems GPS andGLONASS does not meet the requirements of civil aviation and can therefore be not used as asole means of navigation. To overcome system limitations with respect to integrity,augmentation systems like WAAS, EGNOS and MSAS are under development. Their mainoutput are corrections for• ionospheric effects• satellite clock• satellite ephemerisemitted by geostationary Inmarsat space crafts. A central processing facility has torecomputed satellite orbits to provide orbit and clock corrections at a high update rate. Thishas to be done for up to 51 satellites. Fast corrections which are applied directly to the rangemeasurement are provided at an update interval smaller than 6 seconds to meet time-to-alarmrequirements for CAT I. So called “long term” corrections provide vector corrections forposition and velocity which are updated approximately every 6 minutes. Both, fast and longterm corrections have to be applied additionally to the broadcast ephemeris transmitted by theGPS and GLONASS space crafts.Summarising the measures taken to enhance integrity we find1. ephemeris correction2. at a high update rate3. with minimum data latency4. and corrections to the ionospheric effectsFuture satellite navigation systems like Galileo will provide at least dual or maybe even triplefrequency links. Even the existing GPS system is going to be enhanced and the nextgeneration of replenishment satellites (starting with Block II F) will provide a civil availableranging code on two frequencies. What’s left, is the integrity of Satellite orbit and clock.R. Wolf Page 153
- Page 118 and 119: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 120 and 121: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 122 and 123: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 124 and 125: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 126 and 127: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 128 and 129: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 130 and 131: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 132 and 133: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 134 and 135: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 136 and 137: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 138 and 139: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 140 and 141: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 142 and 143: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 144 and 145: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 146 and 147: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 148 and 149: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 150 and 151: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 152 and 153: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 154 and 155: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 156 and 157: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 158 and 159: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 160 and 161: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 162 and 163: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 164 and 165: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 166 and 167: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 170 and 171: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 172 and 173: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 174 and 175: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 176 and 177: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 178 and 179: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 180 and 181: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 182 and 183: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 184 and 185: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 186 and 187: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 188 and 189: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 190 and 191: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 192 and 193: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 194 and 195: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 196 and 197: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 198 and 199: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 200 and 201: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 202 and 203: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 204 and 205: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 206 and 207: ReferencesInter Satellite Linksinte
- Page 208 and 209: ReferencesInter Satellite Linkshalf
- Page 210: ReferencesInter Satellite LinksSan
Autonomous Onboard Processing<strong>Inter</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Links</strong>7 AUTONOMOUS ONBOARD PROCESSING7.1 Why Onboard Processing?In a typical conventional orbit estimation process, ranging signals are transmitted by thesatellite whereas measurements are taken by the ground stations. There are two exceptions,the DORIS <strong>and</strong> the PRARE system: both systems are performing measurements onboard.• PRARE uses two way the range <strong>and</strong> range rate measurements in the X-b<strong>and</strong> withphase coherent ground transponders. It has four channels; therefore it is limited to foursimultaneous measurements. Moreover, due to the fact that the transponders are phasecoherent <strong>and</strong> X b<strong>and</strong> frequencies require directive antennae, the ground transponderscan serve only one satellite at a time. Although PRARE is used for orbit heightsbetween 500 <strong>and</strong> 2000 km, it is principally not limited to a special orbit class. Duringthe AUNAP project (1996) PRARE has been evaluated as an option for anautonomous navigation processor onboard an IGSO satellite.• DORIS receives codeless carrier signals on two frequencies (S-b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> UHF) fromso called ground beacons <strong>and</strong> performs Doppler 1 measurements. Because range ratemeasurements are independent of the clock offset, one “Master Beacon” transmits akind of ranging code, which is needed to perform at least coarse synchronisation of theonboard clocks. Doppler measurements allow precise orbit estimation if the satellitedynamics are high, therefore it is more or less restricted to LEO orbits.Nevertheless, even in those systems the measurements are downloaded <strong>and</strong> transmitted viadata link to a central facility for further processing. In navigation applications like GPS <strong>and</strong>GLONASS, the central processing facility performs then orbit determination, orbit prediction<strong>and</strong> broadcast ephemeris adjustment.But given the fact that measurements are available, onboard processing has some advantages.The data latency can be reduced to a minimum. Therefore it is best suited for applicationswere fast reaction is desired. In navigation applications, the following four parameters are ameasure for the performance of a system:• Accuracy• Availability• Continuity of Service• IntegrityThe first two parameters are driven by the system’s design. Accuracy is mainly driven by twofactors, the radio frequency link (signal-in-space) <strong>and</strong> the broadcast ephemeris, <strong>and</strong> can beenhanced e.g. by1 Although DORIS performs no ranging but Doppler measurements, the two frequencies are needed to correctfor ionospheric effects, which are in fact an issue due to 10 seconds integration time. Because of this longintegration time, it would be more appropriate to speak of phase rate instead of Doppler measurements.Page 152R. Wolf