Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links Satellite Orbit and Ephemeris Determination using Inter Satellite Links
Simulations and ResultsInter Satellite Links6.2.8.2 Ground and Intersatellite Tracking (Full Network)The following scenario has been processed using all available types of inter satellite links, butlimiting the number of simultaneous ISL's to 6. It can be seen that orbit detereminationaccuracy is improved well below 10 cm in radial direction for both types of satellites. Thefollowing picture show the accuracy figure for the MEO satellites.Radial Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Radial Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:127.06.0-7.003.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Along Track Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:128.08.0-8.004.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Cross Track Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Cross T rack Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:127.016.0-7.008.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Figure 6-38 Tracking Accuracy of MEO using ISL'sThe next picture shows the accuracy figure for the GEO satellites. Radial accuracy is nearlyas good as for the MEO, only the tangential accuracy is slightly worse.Page 134R. Wolf
Inter Satellite LinksSimulations and ResultsRadial Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Radial Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:1210.06.0-10.003.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Along Track Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:1217.024.0-17.0012.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Cross T rack Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Cross T rack Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:1213.018.0-13.009.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Figure 6-39 Tracking Accuracy of GEO using ISL'sR. Wolf Page 135
- Page 100 and 101: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 102 and 103: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 104 and 105: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 106 and 107: Software DescriptionInter Satellite
- Page 108 and 109: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 110 and 111: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 112 and 113: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 114 and 115: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 116 and 117: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 118 and 119: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 120 and 121: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 122 and 123: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 124 and 125: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 126 and 127: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 128 and 129: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 130 and 131: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 132 and 133: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 134 and 135: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 136 and 137: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 138 and 139: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 140 and 141: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 142 and 143: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 144 and 145: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 146 and 147: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 148 and 149: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 152 and 153: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 154 and 155: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 156 and 157: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 158 and 159: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 160 and 161: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 162 and 163: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 164 and 165: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 166 and 167: Simulations and ResultsInter Satell
- Page 168 and 169: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 170 and 171: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 172 and 173: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 174 and 175: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 176 and 177: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 178 and 179: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 180 and 181: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 182 and 183: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 184 and 185: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 186 and 187: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 188 and 189: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 190 and 191: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 192 and 193: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 194 and 195: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 196 and 197: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
- Page 198 and 199: Autonomous Onboard ProcessingInter
Simulations <strong>and</strong> Results<strong>Inter</strong> <strong>Satellite</strong> <strong>Links</strong>6.2.8.2 Ground <strong>and</strong> <strong>Inter</strong>satellite Tracking (Full Network)The following scenario has been processed <strong>using</strong> all available types of inter satellite links, butlimiting the number of simultaneous ISL's to 6. It can be seen that orbit detereminationaccuracy is improved well below 10 cm in radial direction for both types of satellites. Thefollowing picture show the accuracy figure for the MEO satellites.Radial Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Radial Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:127.06.0-7.003.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Along Track Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Along Track Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:128.08.0-8.004.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Cross Track Error [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:12Cross T rack Std. Dev. [cm] 1998 07 02 01:12 - 1998 07 07 13:127.016.0-7.008.0[h]32 64 96 1280[h]31 62 93 124Figure 6-38 Tracking Accuracy of MEO <strong>using</strong> ISL'sThe next picture shows the accuracy figure for the GEO satellites. Radial accuracy is nearlyas good as for the MEO, only the tangential accuracy is slightly worse.Page 134R. Wolf