11.07.2015 Views

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong> 221multiple opportunities for review. Study 2 f<strong>in</strong>ds that a greater number <strong>of</strong> words were learnedand attributes this to added reviews and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>of</strong> word mean<strong>in</strong>gs.BOWYER-CRANE, C., & SNOWLING, M. J. (2005). Assess<strong>in</strong>g children’s <strong>in</strong>ference generation: What dotests <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g comprehension measure? British Journal <strong>of</strong> Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189-201.Exam<strong>in</strong>es whe<strong>the</strong>r poor comprehenders have comprehension difficulties <strong>in</strong> general, or problemswith mak<strong>in</strong>g particular types <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ferences. Analyzes <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> 10 poor and 10normal n<strong>in</strong>e-year-old readers on two read<strong>in</strong>g comprehension tests. F<strong>in</strong>ds that poorcomprehenders were able to make cohesive <strong>in</strong>ferences, but performed poorly on generat<strong>in</strong>gknowledge-based and elaborative <strong>in</strong>ferences. Concludes that poor comprehenders would benefitfrom support <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> real-world knowledge to generate <strong>in</strong>ferences dur<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>g.BRITTO, P. R., BROOKS-GUNN, G., & GRIFFIN, T. M. (2006). Maternal read<strong>in</strong>g and teach<strong>in</strong>g patterns:Associations with school read<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come African American families. Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Research</strong>Quarterly, 41(1), 68-89.Investigates <strong>the</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g patterns and levels <strong>of</strong> support displayed by young African Americanmo<strong>the</strong>rs while <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong>ir preschool-aged children <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir homes. Mo<strong>the</strong>r-child <strong>in</strong>teractionswere videotaped, coded, and later categorized <strong>in</strong>to two styles (story readers and storytellers) and three teach<strong>in</strong>g patterns (low support and low teach<strong>in</strong>g; support and low teach<strong>in</strong>g;support and teach<strong>in</strong>g). F<strong>in</strong>ds that children’s vocabulary and school read<strong>in</strong>ess are improved when<strong>the</strong>y are exposed to a more <strong>in</strong>teractive and supportive maternal teach<strong>in</strong>g pattern.CARLISLE, J. F., & STONE, C. A. (2005). Explor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> morphemes <strong>in</strong> word read<strong>in</strong>g. Read<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Research</strong> Quarterly, 40(4), 428-449.Investigates <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> morphemic structure on students’ word-read<strong>in</strong>g skills through two studies.The first study analyzed 2nd through 3rd grade and 5th through 6th grade students’ read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>words that conta<strong>in</strong> a base word plus affix, versus a similar word with only one morpheme (e.g.,hilly versus silly). The second study compared middle and high school students’ read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>derived words that were phonologically transparent (e.g., security) versus derived words with asound shift (e.g., precision). F<strong>in</strong>ds that morphemic structure plays a role <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g derivedwords: students read derived words more quickly and accurately than similar words that conta<strong>in</strong>edonly one morpheme. At <strong>the</strong> secondary level, students more quickly and accurately readphonologically transparent derived words. Emphasizes <strong>the</strong> need to <strong>in</strong>clude morphemic analysis<strong>in</strong> models <strong>of</strong> word-read<strong>in</strong>g development.EDMUNDS, K. E., & BAUSERMAN, K. L. (2006). What teachers can learn about read<strong>in</strong>g motivationthrough conversations with children. The Read<strong>in</strong>g Teacher, 59(5), 414-424.Exam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g motivation <strong>of</strong> 4th grade students by <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g a random sample <strong>of</strong>students from various achievement levels and levels <strong>of</strong> motivation (as perceived by <strong>the</strong>ir teachers).F<strong>in</strong>ds that students are motivated to read narrative texts that connect to <strong>the</strong>ir personal<strong>in</strong>terests, that have specific characteristics such as be<strong>in</strong>g “funny,” and that <strong>the</strong>y are allowed tochoose <strong>the</strong>mselves. Factors that contributed to motivation for expository texts <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> knowledgestudents ga<strong>in</strong>, as well as personal <strong>in</strong>terest and choice. Students described be<strong>in</strong>g motivatedto read by family members, teachers, and <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic motivation. Children <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> studyfrequently mentioned peers as <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g what books to select and be<strong>in</strong>g motivated to read<strong>the</strong>m.GEHSMANN, K. M., & WOODSIDE-JIRON, H. (2005). Becom<strong>in</strong>g more effective <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> accountability:A high-poverty school narrows <strong>the</strong> literacy achievement gap. In B. Maloch, J. V. H<strong>of</strong>fman,D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, & J. Worthy (Eds.), The 54th yearbook <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national read<strong>in</strong>gconference (pp. 182-197). Oak Creek, WI: The National Read<strong>in</strong>g Conference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!