11.07.2015 Views

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> Volume 41 November 2006STALLWORTH, B., GIBBONS, L., & FAUBER, L. (2006). It’s not on <strong>the</strong> list: An exploration <strong>of</strong> teachers’perspectives on us<strong>in</strong>g multicultural literature. Journal <strong>of</strong> Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6), 478–489.Exam<strong>in</strong>es which book-length works were taught most frequently <strong>in</strong> Alabama high school <strong>English</strong>language arts classrooms <strong>in</strong> order to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> multicultural texts. F<strong>in</strong>ds thatcommon lists <strong>of</strong> selections tended to have a Eurocentric and patriarchic bias, but that a widevariety <strong>of</strong> books are taught, and that what teachers consider “classics” do not necessarily reflect<strong>the</strong> traditional canon. Suggests that lack <strong>of</strong> resources, concerns about censorship, time constra<strong>in</strong>ts,and lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about multicultural literature affect teachers’ decisions to teachmulticultural literature <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> classroom.STONE, J. C. (2005). Textual borderlands: Students’ recontextualizations <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g children’sbooks. Language Arts, 83(1), 42-51.Analyzes 12 female middle-school students’ children’s book writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>“recontextualizations” <strong>of</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>gs, characters, language, and popular culture <strong>in</strong> ways that mediatebetween <strong>the</strong>ir community and school cultures. F<strong>in</strong>ds that students create characters <strong>of</strong> colorto address <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> such characters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir school read<strong>in</strong>g, African American Vernacular<strong>English</strong> for use <strong>in</strong> dialogue, popular culture artifacts, and music <strong>in</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g characters’appearance and practices. Suggests <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> children’s books to foster criticalliteracies.SUMARA, D., DAVIS, B., & IFTODY, T. (2006). Normaliz<strong>in</strong>g literary responses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> teacher educationclassroom. Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>English</strong>, 13(1), 55-67.Analyzes preservice <strong>English</strong> teachers’ responses to a young adult novel portray<strong>in</strong>g challenges tonormative sexual stereotypes. Draws on consciousness <strong>the</strong>ory to exam<strong>in</strong>e how participants’responses reflect tensions between <strong>the</strong> normative discourses related to sexuality operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teacher education programs and methods courses versus <strong>the</strong> need to <strong>in</strong>terrogate those normativediscourses. Develops <strong>the</strong>ories on how preservice <strong>English</strong> teachers’ conscious awareness <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir own identities evolved dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir teacher education programs.SUTHERLAND, L. M. (2005). Black adolescent girls’ use <strong>of</strong> literacy practices to negotiate boundaries<strong>of</strong> ascribed identity. Journal <strong>of</strong> Literacy <strong>Research</strong>, 37(3), 365-406.Follows six 16-year-old Black girls as <strong>the</strong>y studied Morrison’s The Bluest Eye <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir high school<strong>English</strong> class. F<strong>in</strong>ds that <strong>the</strong>se girls used <strong>the</strong>ir read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> novel to explore <strong>the</strong>ir own lifeexperiences ra<strong>the</strong>r than to explore <strong>the</strong> story itself. As <strong>the</strong>y did so, <strong>the</strong>y exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> forces thatcreated boundaries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own lives, challenged <strong>the</strong>se boundaries, and worked toge<strong>the</strong>r toconstruct <strong>the</strong>ir identities as young Black women.VERBOORD, M. (2005). Long-term effects <strong>of</strong> literary education on book-read<strong>in</strong>g frequency: Ananalysis <strong>of</strong> Dutch student cohorts 1975-1998. Poetics, 33(5-6), 320-342.Investigates <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> teacher- versus student-centered approaches to literary educationon students’ book-read<strong>in</strong>g frequency later <strong>in</strong> life. Eighty-five mo<strong>the</strong>r-tongue teachers <strong>in</strong> Dutchsecondary education were retrospectively questioned about <strong>the</strong>ir literature <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> a randomyear between 1975 and 1998. About 700 former students <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se teachers were <strong>in</strong>terviewedabout <strong>the</strong>ir current read<strong>in</strong>g frequency. F<strong>in</strong>ds that a student-centered approach to literatureteach<strong>in</strong>g is associated with higher book-read<strong>in</strong>g frequency, while a teacher-centered approachis associated with lower book-read<strong>in</strong>g frequency <strong>in</strong> later life.WARREN, J. E. (2006). Literary scholars process<strong>in</strong>g poetry and construct<strong>in</strong>g arguments. WrittenCommunication, 23(2), 202-226.Investigates <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g-to-write processes <strong>of</strong> literary scholars. Focuses on <strong>the</strong> special “topoi” or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!