11.07.2015 Views

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong> 217HICKS, D. (2005). Class read<strong>in</strong>gs: Story and discourse among girls <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g-poor America.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(3), 212-229.Analyzes a group <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g-class, late-elementary-age students’ literary responses, writ<strong>in</strong>g,and identity construction, students with whom <strong>the</strong> researcher worked with over a four-yearperiod. F<strong>in</strong>ds that her students enjoy writ<strong>in</strong>g and shar<strong>in</strong>g horror fiction that dramatizes violencederived from popular culture versions <strong>of</strong> horror fiction, as well as shar<strong>in</strong>g responses tomore canonical literary texts. The mesh<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> researcher’s own middle-class discourses andturn-tak<strong>in</strong>g practices with <strong>the</strong> students’ work<strong>in</strong>g-class discourses and language use created acarnivalesque (Bakht<strong>in</strong>ian), bil<strong>in</strong>gual hybrid discourse for negotiat<strong>in</strong>g differences between homeand school cultures. Suggests <strong>the</strong> need to import “<strong>the</strong> real” from popular culture <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> classroom.MCINTYRE, E., KYLE, D. W., & MOORE, G. H. (2006). A primary-grade teacher’s guidance towardsmall-group dialogue. Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Research</strong> Quarterly, 41(1), 36-66.Describes <strong>the</strong> behaviors and language used by one 2nd-grade teacher to promote small-groupdialogue about mystery books and related literary concepts. Analysis <strong>of</strong> teacher-student talksuggests that teacher-fronted discourse can be important to achiev<strong>in</strong>g students’ eventual participation<strong>in</strong> true dialogue. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs also suggest that <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> non-evaluative responsesand l<strong>in</strong>guistic and paral<strong>in</strong>guistic cues can help scaffold students’ participation <strong>in</strong>to genu<strong>in</strong>eclassroom dialogue.MIKKELSEN, N. (2005). Powerful magic: Learn<strong>in</strong>g from children’s responses to fantasy literature.New York: Teachers College Press.Analyzes children’s responses to picture books, <strong>in</strong> which students expressed responses throughstories, draw<strong>in</strong>g, or drama; 2nd grade students’ responses to seven re-read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Louis <strong>the</strong> Fish,and changes <strong>in</strong> responses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same two males at ages 5 and 7 and ages 7 and 13 to two fantasynovels. F<strong>in</strong>ds that employ<strong>in</strong>g imag<strong>in</strong>ative approaches and texts can foster rich responses <strong>in</strong>children.PACE, B. G. (2006). Between response and <strong>in</strong>terpretation: Ideological becom<strong>in</strong>g and literacyevents <strong>in</strong> critical read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> literature. Journal <strong>of</strong> Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(7), 584-594.Draws on Bakht<strong>in</strong>’s notion <strong>of</strong> “ideological becom<strong>in</strong>g” to consider how dialogic exchanges focusedon works <strong>of</strong> literature can support or subvert critical understand<strong>in</strong>gs. Analyzes two femalecollege students’ responses to “The Yellow Wallpaper” (Gilman, 1899) to determ<strong>in</strong>e how<strong>the</strong>y changed <strong>the</strong>ir critical stance on <strong>in</strong>equities <strong>in</strong> gender and marriage as <strong>the</strong>y participated <strong>in</strong>post-read<strong>in</strong>g events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir literature class. F<strong>in</strong>ds that <strong>the</strong> students shifted away from voic<strong>in</strong>g an<strong>in</strong>itial critical stance after participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a class discussion to adopt a read<strong>in</strong>g that reflecteddom<strong>in</strong>ant ideologies, reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> “norm<strong>in</strong>g” effects <strong>of</strong> group attitudes. Suggeststhat literature teachers who <strong>in</strong>troduce multiple perspectives need to have explicit strategies forsupport<strong>in</strong>g students’ emerg<strong>in</strong>g critical perspectives.SMITH, M. W., & CONNOLLY, W. (2005). The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretive authority on classroom discussions<strong>of</strong> poetry: Lessons from one teacher. Communication Education, 54(4), 271-288.Studies <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> three different teacher authority conditions on two 9th grade classes’ discussions<strong>of</strong> poetry: <strong>the</strong> teacher taught 1) a poem he had written, 2) a poem he had taught manytimes previously, and 3) a poem that he saw for <strong>the</strong> first time along with his students. Analyzesturn-tak<strong>in</strong>g, k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> reason<strong>in</strong>g, and knowledge sources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussions. F<strong>in</strong>ds significantdifferences <strong>in</strong> treatment effect; <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>re is less <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> teacher authorityfosters more student dialogue, although <strong>the</strong> treatment effect can vary accord<strong>in</strong>g to differences<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social dynamics at work <strong>in</strong> discussions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!