Exclusivefocus - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ...

Exclusivefocus - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ... Exclusivefocus - National Association of Professional Allstate Agents ...

11.07.2015 Views

testing regulatory agencies. The company’sstable of highly skilled attorneys andlobbyists, along with its financial wherewithal,can be a huge hurdle for cashstrappedstate and federal agencies thatwant to challenge questionable companypractices. Obviously, Allstate knows thisand, in fact, counts on it in order to getits way. The company’s deliberate refusalto observe IRS independent contractorguidelines is a case in point. If the IRSpushes back, the company will then beforced to deal with the issue, but notwithout a fight. That is why it is importantfor Allstate agents to rally aroundthis issue and ask the IRS to intervene.The IRS case is not the only example.Here are some other recent examples:• In 2008, Allstate had its authorityto sell insurance suspended in the Stateof Florida for, among other things, failingto produce certain documents thatwere requested by subpoena in October2007. In the eyes of many observers, itappeared that the company defied and/orchallenged the Florida Office of InsuranceRegulation every step of the way,essentially making a mockery of the proceedings.It got so bad that Florida StateSenator Bill Posey declared, “I haven'tseen this much bobbing and weavingsince Mohammad Ali did the rope-adope.”Posey’s comment was in directresponse to testimony from then AllstateFloridian CEO Joe Richardson, whohas since been promoted to senior vicepresident of Sales and Customer Service.It appears that “taking one for the team”has its rewards.When the dust settled from all of thecourt decisions and appeals, Allstate oweda $5 million fine along with other concessions.“It is unfortunate that Allstate's disregardof Florida law required the Officeto take the drastic actions that we did inorder to bring Allstate into compliance,”said Commissioner McCarty.• Then in 2007, Allstate was heldin contempt of a Missouri Court (DaleDeer and Terri Deer vs. Allstate Insurance)and ordered to pay fines of $25,000 perday for the violation of two court ordersinvolving production of documents forthat case. In an act of unbelievable defiance,Allstate continued to ignore theorder and told the judge in a hearing thatit would not produce the documents, nomatter what the fine.• In 2006, Allstate paid $18.6 millionin restitution for improper notificationof rate increases and policy changes.Just over a year later, the Maryland InsuranceAdministration fined Allstate$750,000 for basically the same violations– the largest fine ever imposed ona property and casualty company. “It isvery simple,” said Maryland InsuranceCommissioner Ralph Tyler. “Here wehave multiple compliance violations, andAllstate moved too slowly to correct theproblems. Allstate was put on notice andfined more than a year ago for similarcompliance violations.”• As stated earlier, the foregoing arerecent examples of a company that appearsto be begging for legal confrontationson several fronts. We called thiskind of behavior “crusin’ for a brusin’”when I was growing up.But this pattern is not new - it has existedfor a number of years. Many agentswill recall the Preparing for the Futureinitiative that was announced in 1999, inwhich the company dismissed approximately6,200 employee agents whileoffering to rehire them as ‘independentcontractors’ without benefits, but only ifthey signed a pledge not to sue for anyviolations of employment law.The Equal Employment OpportunityCommission (EEOC) warned Allstatebefore the agents were dismissed that itwas probably illegal to require them togive up their rights. Allstate ignored theEEOC warning and proceeded to forceagents to sign the waiver in order to keeptheir jobs. The EEOC later sued thecompany and, as we go to press, the caseis under appeal.I offer the preceding examples onlyto illustrate what government agenciesand the agency force are up against inchallenging Allstate. While not unbeatable,the combination of the company’sdefiance, bluster, tenacity and formidablearsenal of top-notch attorneys is reasonenough to think twice before filing suit.The few rights that Allstate agentshave left are being eroded one by one.Most recently, it was announced in someregions that, as of March 1, all new agencystaff will be required to attend the company’sSales Producer University (SPU)within 18 months of obtaining an Allstateappointment. Staffers who don’t complywill have their appointments revoked.NAPAA has also received word thatagents in some markets are being requiredto ask a specific set of questions whenprospects call their offices for a quote. The“enforcement police,” otherwise known as“mystery shoppers,” reportedly will monitoragency compliance.So, the amount of control over yourbusiness continues to grow and no agencyowner is immune. More control begetsmore anxiety and stress on agencyowners which, in turn produces morehealth and family problems. Moreover,these unhealthy pressures can be compoundedby circumstances beyond thecontrol of the agent. Say, for example,that you are lucky enough to have a greatEFS in your market. He’s so good thatnearly every agent in the market makestheir Expected Results. Suddenly, oneday he quits, with no replacement insight. For years, you and the others havedepended on him to make your numbers.Now you have no help and have forgottenmost of what you knew about sellinglife insurance and securities. How willyou reach your Expected Results now?Or, what if your child, parent or spousecontracts a major illness, forcing you tospend more time away from the office?In either case, how long do you think thecompany will tolerate poor results? Thecompany’s take-no-prisoners approachis that agents have a job to do, and thatjob includes making Expected Results. Ifyou are among those with a good EFS,you should be counting your blessingsevery day.The frustrating part about the company’sautocratic approach is that it simplydoesn’t work well. It is counterproductiveand stifles productivity. This thick-headedphilosophy is a big part of the reasonwhy the company is struggling with marketshare today. The results of the latestAgent Relationship Survey were dismal.46 — Exclusivefocus Spring 2009

And had the survey had 100% participation,the results would have been muchworse. Chances are, most of those whofailed to participate are, perhaps, themost dissatisfied of all. Even some ofthe blue-blooded company faithful havelost confidence. Something’s very wrong.And threatening agents with terminationwill not improve the results.There are plenty of good things to sayabout Allstate, but its willful disregardof IRS rules as they relate to independentcontractors and its heavy-handedcontrol tactics are not among them. It isclear that the company is attempting toblur the lines that separate independentcontractors from employees. It’s almostif Allstate is trying to create a new classof worker, a hybrid of sorts that we callan “Indeployee.” This worker possessesnearly all of the characteristics of an employee,but has no rights, privileges orbenefits, yet must still pay all business-relatedexpenses. For its part, the employerenjoys immense tax advantages and hasthe power to control, bully, berate andterminate indeployees at will.Fans of cartoon character Popeye willrecall that every time he was pushed toofar he would declare, “I can stands somuch, but I can’t stands no more.” Popeye’snemesis was a bully named Bluto,an intimidating giant of a man, whowould pulverize Popeye whenever possible.But Popeye always carried a secretweapon with him, a weapon that Blutokept forgetting about. So as Bluto waspounding away on him, Popeye wouldreach inside his shirt and grab a can ofsuperpower-producing spinach, whichwould save the day.Let’s face it; the agency force is weak,but not helpless. Agents can help themselvesby becoming NAPAA members.For nearly 20 years NAPAA has beenprodding agents to coalesce together ina united front. Can NAPAA slow downor stop the assault on agent rights? Yeswe can, by reaching our goal of 10,000members. Just think what NAPAA couldaccomplish with over $3 million in annualrevenues.Joining NAPAA is the least of yourworries. Membership is highly confidential.No one will ever know youare a member unless you tell them oryou run for a position on the NAPAABoard of Directors. To this day, Allstatemanagers across the country tell agentsthat NAPAA is comprised of a group of“disgruntled” agents. Sure, many of ourmembers are discontented for a numberof reasons, including the RFG formula,the events in Canada and being subjectedto employee-like controls. But basedon the last Agency Relationship Survey,it’s crystal clear that even nonmemberagents share these same concerns. Thedifference is that NAPAA openly discussesit and is willing to do somethingabout it. Our only limitation is funding,which can be easily solved by reachingour goal of 10,000 members.What should concern agency ownersis that every agent in this country is nota NAPAA member. NAPAA is the onlyprofessional trade association dedicatedsolely to your well-being and success.There is no other organization that canhonestly make that claim. There is absolutelyno benefit to not joining.If you are concerned about managementfinding out you’re a member, forget aboutit. The only way they’ll find out is if you tellthem. In addition, there are no rewards fornot being a NAPAA member. Never oncehas a nonmember been exempted fromcompany requirements such as ExpectedResults, office hours, call forwarding, oropening their office on holidays. Nor hasAllstate ever stopped a termination becausesomeone was a nonmember. Therefore,being a nonmember won’t save yourjob or get you special favors.You cannot wait until your house hasburned to the ground to buy your homeinsurance; you cannot wait until there isno oil left in the world to find alternativesources of energy, and you certainlyshouldn’t stand by watching fellow agentslose their livelihoods or passively witnessthe disappearance of your few remainingindependent contractor freedoms. Isn’t ittime you put your big boy pants on andstand up for yourself?Many tenured agents will recall thestunning blue acrylic pyramid the companypresented, presumably, to all agentsand employees around the time the companywent public in 1993. When it wasintroduced, the company explained thateach of the three sides of the pyramidwere equally important to the long-termhealth of the company. The idea wasthat all stakeholders would share in thecompany’s success. In any case, it wasan awesome and admirable vision whichsenior management, with some notableexceptions, appeared to enthusiasticallyembrace.Fast-forward to 2009. Clearly, thepyramid has lost its luster. The GoodSpring 2009 Exclusivefocus — 47

testing regulatory agencies. The company’sstable <strong>of</strong> highly skilled attorneys andlobbyists, along with its financial wherewithal,can be a huge hurdle for cashstrappedstate and federal agencies thatwant to challenge questionable companypractices. Obviously, <strong>Allstate</strong> knows thisand, in fact, counts on it in order to getits way. The company’s deliberate refusalto observe IRS independent contractorguidelines is a case in point. If the IRSpushes back, the company will then beforced to deal with the issue, but notwithout a fight. That is why it is importantfor <strong>Allstate</strong> agents to rally aroundthis issue and ask the IRS to intervene.The IRS case is not the only example.Here are some other recent examples:• In 2008, <strong>Allstate</strong> had its authorityto sell insurance suspended in the State<strong>of</strong> Florida for, among other things, failingto produce certain documents thatwere requested by subpoena in October2007. In the eyes <strong>of</strong> many observers, itappeared that the company defied and/orchallenged the Florida Office <strong>of</strong> InsuranceRegulation every step <strong>of</strong> the way,essentially making a mockery <strong>of</strong> the proceedings.It got so bad that Florida StateSenator Bill Posey declared, “I haven'tseen this much bobbing and weavingsince Mohammad Ali did the rope-adope.”Posey’s comment was in directresponse to testimony from then <strong>Allstate</strong>Floridian CEO Joe Richardson, whohas since been promoted to senior vicepresident <strong>of</strong> Sales and Customer Service.It appears that “taking one for the team”has its rewards.When the dust settled from all <strong>of</strong> thecourt decisions and appeals, <strong>Allstate</strong> oweda $5 million fine along with other concessions.“It is unfortunate that <strong>Allstate</strong>'s disregard<strong>of</strong> Florida law required the Officeto take the drastic actions that we did inorder to bring <strong>Allstate</strong> into compliance,”said Commissioner McCarty.• Then in 2007, <strong>Allstate</strong> was heldin contempt <strong>of</strong> a Missouri Court (DaleDeer and Terri Deer vs. <strong>Allstate</strong> Insurance)and ordered to pay fines <strong>of</strong> $25,000 perday for the violation <strong>of</strong> two court ordersinvolving production <strong>of</strong> documents forthat case. In an act <strong>of</strong> unbelievable defiance,<strong>Allstate</strong> continued to ignore theorder and told the judge in a hearing thatit would not produce the documents, nomatter what the fine.• In 2006, <strong>Allstate</strong> paid $18.6 millionin restitution for improper notification<strong>of</strong> rate increases and policy changes.Just over a year later, the Maryland InsuranceAdministration fined <strong>Allstate</strong>$750,000 for basically the same violations– the largest fine ever imposed ona property and casualty company. “It isvery simple,” said Maryland InsuranceCommissioner Ralph Tyler. “Here wehave multiple compliance violations, and<strong>Allstate</strong> moved too slowly to correct theproblems. <strong>Allstate</strong> was put on notice andfined more than a year ago for similarcompliance violations.”• As stated earlier, the foregoing arerecent examples <strong>of</strong> a company that appearsto be begging for legal confrontationson several fronts. We called thiskind <strong>of</strong> behavior “crusin’ for a brusin’”when I was growing up.But this pattern is not new - it has existedfor a number <strong>of</strong> years. Many agentswill recall the Preparing for the Futureinitiative that was announced in 1999, inwhich the company dismissed approximately6,200 employee agents while<strong>of</strong>fering to rehire them as ‘independentcontractors’ without benefits, but only ifthey signed a pledge not to sue for anyviolations <strong>of</strong> employment law.The Equal Employment OpportunityCommission (EEOC) warned <strong>Allstate</strong>before the agents were dismissed that itwas probably illegal to require them togive up their rights. <strong>Allstate</strong> ignored theEEOC warning and proceeded to forceagents to sign the waiver in order to keeptheir jobs. The EEOC later sued thecompany and, as we go to press, the caseis under appeal.I <strong>of</strong>fer the preceding examples onlyto illustrate what government agenciesand the agency force are up against inchallenging <strong>Allstate</strong>. While not unbeatable,the combination <strong>of</strong> the company’sdefiance, bluster, tenacity and formidablearsenal <strong>of</strong> top-notch attorneys is reasonenough to think twice before filing suit.The few rights that <strong>Allstate</strong> agentshave left are being eroded one by one.Most recently, it was announced in someregions that, as <strong>of</strong> March 1, all new agencystaff will be required to attend the company’sSales Producer University (SPU)within 18 months <strong>of</strong> obtaining an <strong>Allstate</strong>appointment. Staffers who don’t complywill have their appointments revoked.NAPAA has also received word thatagents in some markets are being requiredto ask a specific set <strong>of</strong> questions whenprospects call their <strong>of</strong>fices for a quote. The“enforcement police,” otherwise known as“mystery shoppers,” reportedly will monitoragency compliance.So, the amount <strong>of</strong> control over yourbusiness continues to grow and no agencyowner is immune. More control begetsmore anxiety and stress on agencyowners which, in turn produces morehealth and family problems. Moreover,these unhealthy pressures can be compoundedby circumstances beyond thecontrol <strong>of</strong> the agent. Say, for example,that you are lucky enough to have a greatEFS in your market. He’s so good thatnearly every agent in the market makestheir Expected Results. Suddenly, oneday he quits, with no replacement insight. For years, you and the others havedepended on him to make your numbers.Now you have no help and have forgottenmost <strong>of</strong> what you knew about sellinglife insurance and securities. How willyou reach your Expected Results now?Or, what if your child, parent or spousecontracts a major illness, forcing you tospend more time away from the <strong>of</strong>fice?In either case, how long do you think thecompany will tolerate poor results? Thecompany’s take-no-prisoners approachis that agents have a job to do, and thatjob includes making Expected Results. Ifyou are among those with a good EFS,you should be counting your blessingsevery day.The frustrating part about the company’sautocratic approach is that it simplydoesn’t work well. It is counterproductiveand stifles productivity. This thick-headedphilosophy is a big part <strong>of</strong> the reasonwhy the company is struggling with marketshare today. The results <strong>of</strong> the latestAgent Relationship Survey were dismal.46 — <strong>Exclusivefocus</strong> Spring 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!