11.07.2015 Views

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The third variation of Figure 4.48 repeats <strong>the</strong> second variation but for a 1 km water column. With <strong>the</strong>exception of data in Figure 4.55, where <strong>the</strong> western edge of <strong>the</strong> target is fixed and <strong>the</strong> western edgevaries, responses show greater variation that for <strong>the</strong> equivalent 100 m water column cases. The ability todelineate a target’s extent depends on <strong>the</strong> survey configuration. If surveys straddle <strong>the</strong> injection well, and<strong>the</strong> CO 2 plume expands symmetrically around that well, <strong>the</strong>n mCSEM can only delineate targets when<strong>the</strong>ir length is greater than 4 km (Figure 4.56). However, if surveys are positioned some distance from<strong>the</strong> injection well so that in plume moves towards <strong>the</strong> transmitter, as in Figure 4.57, <strong>the</strong>n as with a 100 mwater column in Figure 4.53, variations in target size can clearly be distinguished. The advantage of adeeper water column is that more confidence can be ascribed to an interpretation because all measuredcomponents show similar variation.| 107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!