The Voice of St. Matthews, April 20, 1950:DON’T LET SCHEMING INTERESTS SMASH ST. MATTHEWSLET’S ACT NOW TO SAVE THE FUTURE OF OUR COMMUNITYLouisville Doesn't Want To Annex Us Its Only Wants To Stall and Delay UsLouisville does not actually want to annex St. Matthews.Louisville has had 25 years in which to annex us. Now why this sudden haste?It only wants to hinder, delay and scuttle our plans to incorporate and grow.The officials of the City of Louisville have been advised by prominent and responsible citizens of the City and the Countynot to touch St. Matthews. Whether we like the expression or not we are a HOT POTATO for Louisville.Why would Louisville want to annex St. Matthews?The answer is plain and simple. IT ONLY WANTS TO BE ABLE TO SEND US AN ANNUAL TAX BILL OF $2.97 ONEACH $100 PROPERTY VALUATION. The City’s officials openly say we would be “too expensive” for the City tomaintain as they well know we have a right to be and should be maintained.Yes, Louisville wants to saddle St. Matthews with that $2.97 tax rate, if and when Louisville is able and ready to annex us.BUT HOW MUCH IS LOUISVILLE WILLING TO SPEND IN ST. MATTHEWS FOR MAINTENANCE AND IM-PROVEMENTS? Ask, the “experts” that question.There are over 4,000 automobiles in St. Matthews. Do you own an automobile that is valued at $1,000, or more? Did youknow that the $2.97 tax rate will apply to your car as well? It will cost you $29.70 a year to Louisville to own that $1,000car.If you live in St. Matthews and work in Louisville, you already are paying that 1 percent occupational tax, If you make$1,000 a year in Louisville, you already are paying the City of Louisville $10.00 a year to earn that. And there is no assurancethat the occupational tax will not be raised.The truth is that the City of Louisville wants to “take” St. Matthews for a tax ride, if it can. And it doesn’t want to spendanything of that high tax revenue on us. It wants to spend the money in other areas in Louisville.Our answer to the City of Louisville on. that one is:GO GET THE TAXES FROM THE PLACES WHERE YOU INTEND TO SPEND IT.Louisville is not interested in our streets, our sewers, our traffic problem, our general municipal welfare. IT ONLYWANTS US FOR WHAT IT CAN SUCK OUT OF US IN TAX REVENUE. The City fumbled with annexation attemptson St. Matthews AND WAS BEATEN. It is fumbling again. And while Louisville is fumbling, it is trying to keep St. Matthewsdivided AGAINST ITS BEST INTERESTS.One prominent Louisville official told the Louisville City officials it would be unwise and uneconomic for Louisville toattempt any more annexation. THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE IS UNABLE NOW TO RENDER PROPER AND ADE-QUATE SERVICES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF ITS OWN CORPORATE MUNICIPALITY.Could St. Matthews expect any services out of the City of Louisville? Let the “experts” answer that one.Oh, but we can keep our sewer system—and pay for it ourselves— if Louisville annexes us. They promise us that much.BUT ARE WE SUCK-ERS? We would be payingdouble. We would be paying for the sewer systemplus that $2.97 tax rate. AND THAT WOULDHELP LOUISVILLE PAY FOR ITS OWN SEWERSYSTEM, WHICH IS INADEQUATE; ANDAGAINST WHICH THERE STILL IS A DEBTOUTSTANDING OF $17,000,000.Our streets right now are abominable. It is sore tothe eye and to the nerve to drive or to walk throughthem. But St. Matthews HAS A GOOD CASE OFGROWING PAINS. When the sewers .are finished,the streets will be in better shape than they were before.Yes, our streets and our traffic are a sad mess. Butthe worst is done. While we have floundered throughthis mess, the City of Louisville has lain quietly bywaiting for a chance ‘to pounce on us.THE CITY OF ST. MATTHEWS, James H. NolandChairman, Board of Trustees—advertisement4 Page —Advertisement
The Voice of St. Matthews, April 20, 1950:It’s Time To Unite All Of Our Forces To Protect and Develop St. MatthewsWhat should be done about St. Matthews?That’s the $l6,000,000-plus question the City of Louisville would tike to have answered.4 Page —AdvertisementIt means more than that to us in St. Matthews. It means that we must settle the question of whether we are to go on beingkicked around. It means we must decide whether we are going to let ourselves be annexed by the City of Louisville. Itmeans we must determine whether we are going to be independent in spirit and in municipal corporate strength—to grow aswe desire and rightfully feel justified to grow.We cannot remain status quo any longer. We must unite in spirit and in municipal corporate strength to determine our owncourse and future. To delay is to subject ourselves to further indignities at the hands of the “experts.” TO DELAY IS TOLOSE.St. Matthews must progress. It must be able to breathe whenever it wants to without asking some-body—some “expert”—if it can. We must have municipal government. It is the only positive, resolute, decent, righteous, self-respecting course forSt. Matthews. And we must choose NOW.Some think it would be better to be part of Louisville. Some feel St. Matthews can best serve itself, do the best job in itsown interest, as an independent corporate body. Know the facts. We feel sure you will join with those who are for independentcorporate status.The only strength we have is unity. As an unincorporated area, you can be annexed by the City of Louisville without anyinstallation of city services. Unincorporated, we have NO BARGAINING POWER.Incorporated, united in municipal corporate strength, you can BARGAIN with the City of Louisville. YOU CAN DE-MAND THAT THE SEWER DEBT, NOW STANDING AT $2,500,000, BE ASSUMED BY THE CITY OF LOUIS-VILLE—AS THE PRICE OF YOUR WILLINGNESS TO. BE ANNEXED. You can demand that your children be admittedto the city schools without paying tuition. You can demand that police and fire protection, street lights, sanitation, andother services, be given to you immediately upon annexation.BUT UNINCORPORATED, YOU’VE GOT NO BARGAINING POWER. REMEMBER THAT. THE “EXPERTS”KNOW IT. THEY FEAR IT.Do you know that if the $2,500,000 sewer debt is assumed by the Louisville Sewer District, it will save each home ownermore than $1,400? But Louisville will not assume that debt so long as we are divided and unincorporated and yield to annexation.Do you know that annexation by Louisville, in and of itself, does not take you into the Louisville <strong>School</strong> District?Do you know that Louisville does not want to annex St. Matthews now, really, but only wants to keep us from incorporatingso that WE WILL HAVE NO BARGAINING POWER and so that terms of annexation will not have to be agreed on?If and when Louisville sees fit, and is able, to annex St. Matthews.Louisville now has a bonded debt of more than $39,000,000. That is approximately $500 per tax payer. There is authorizationfor the City of Louisville to increasethat. Interest paid on that debt in 1948 was$1,475,500. That is approximately one-thirdof all real property taxes collected by Louisvillethat year.Do you want to start off with $500 as yourshare of the tax debt of the City of Louisville?On debts owed by the City of Louisvillebefore 1931!United as a municipal corporation, St. Matthewscan BARGAIN and name its ownterms to Louisville, if we decide byPROPER VOTE that annexation is best forus. Or, we can govern ourselves.Do you know that the first $50,000 of taxmoney collected by the City of Louisvilleout of St. Matthews WILL GO IMMEDI-ATELY TO PAY INTEREST ON LOUIS-VILLE’S BONDED DEBT?Unite now! Join hands with THE CITY OFST. MATTHEWS, Protect your rights andthe rights of your children!
- Page 2 and 3: Explanation of the following pages,
- Page 6 and 7: The Voice of St. Matthews, April 20
- Page 8 and 9: The Voice of St. Matthews: July 17
- Page 10 and 11: The Voice of St. Matthews: Septembe
- Page 12 and 13: The Voice of St. Matthews, Septembe
- Page 14 and 15: The Voice of St. Matthews, Septembe
- Page 16 and 17: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 18 and 19: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 20 and 21: The Voice of St. Matthews:1955 Adve
- Page 22 and 23: The Voice of St. Matthews, May 5, 1
- Page 24 and 25: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 26 and 27: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 28 and 29: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 30 and 31: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 32 and 33: The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 34 and 35: The Courier-Journal, October 20, 19
- Page 36 and 37: The Courier-Journal, October 20, 19
- Page 38 and 39: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 40 and 41: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 42 and 43: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 44 and 45: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 46 and 47: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 48 and 49: The Voice Of St. Matthews, January
- Page 50 and 51: The Voice Of St. Matthews, February
- Page 52 and 53: The Voice Of St. Matthews, July 18,
- Page 54 and 55:
The Voice of St. Matthews, August 1
- Page 56 and 57:
The Voice of St. Matthews, August 1
- Page 58 and 59:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 60 and 61:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 62 and 63:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 64 and 65:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 66 and 67:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 68 and 69:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 70 and 71:
The Voice of St. Matthews, January
- Page 72 and 73:
The Voice of St. Matthews, April 2,
- Page 74 and 75:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 76 and 77:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 78 and 79:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 80 and 81:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 82 and 83:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 84 and 85:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 86 and 87:
The Voice of St. Matthews, July 16,
- Page 88 and 89:
The Voice-Jeffersonian, April 9, 19
- Page 90 and 91:
The Voice-Jeffersonian, April 9, 19
- Page 92 and 93:
The Voice-Jeffersonian, April 9, 19
- Page 94 and 95:
The Voice-Jeffersonian, April 9, 19
- Page 96 and 97:
Jim Herron Collection:L & N St. Mat
- Page 98 and 99:
The Voice, July 25, 1974:Reading it
- Page 100 and 101:
The Voice, July 25, 1974:25th Anniv
- Page 102 and 103:
The Voice, July 25, 1974:falling li
- Page 104 and 105:
The Voice, July 25, 1974:Under Ogle
- Page 106:
The Voice, July 25, 1974:25th Anniv