26.11.2012 Views

Peptide-Based Drug Design

Peptide-Based Drug Design

Peptide-Based Drug Design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 Bulet<br />

7. Small-volume low-protein absorption polypropylene tubes—either Eppendorf or<br />

Minisorp NUNC Immuno tubes.<br />

8. Water bath or dry incubator adjusted at 45 ◦ C.<br />

2.6. Antimicrobial Assays<br />

Bacteria, yeast, and fungi should be purchased from certified institutions such<br />

as ATCC or Pasteur Institute or from private collections. For antimicrobial activity<br />

screening during the course of purification, sensitive strains are recommended:<br />

Micrococcus luteus (Gram-positive), Escherichia coli D31 (Gram-negative, see<br />

Note 2), and Neurospora crassa (filamentous fungus) are good test organisms.<br />

Pathogenic strains for the animal model can also be used (29). The liquid growth<br />

inhibition assays (antibacterial and antifungal) are preferred to the radial diffusion<br />

assays for high-throughput screening (HTS). In addition, the liquid growth<br />

inhibition assays allow evaluating within a same experiment growth inhibition and<br />

colony-forming unit (CFU) counting, a method frequently used for discriminating<br />

between bacteriostatic and bacteriolytic activities.<br />

1. Adapted media for the microbial strains: potato dextrose broth (PDB, Difco) used<br />

at half-strength (12 g/L for filamentous fungi supplemented with antibiotics) and<br />

Poor broth (PB, 1% bactotryptone, 0.9% NaCl w/v, pH 7.4) if bacterial strains for<br />

activity screening during isolation.<br />

2. Luria Bertani broth (LB, 1% bactotryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.9% NaCl w/v,<br />

pH 7.4) for CFU counting.<br />

3. Antibiotics: 10 mg/mL tetracyclin (Sigma) in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 100<br />

�g/mL cefotaxim (Sigma) in water.<br />

4. 96-well microtitration plates for cell culture (Nunc) and microplate reader and a<br />

spectrophotometer equipped with a filter between 580 and 620 nm.<br />

3. Methods<br />

The following protocols can be used for the isolation and structural characterization<br />

of any natural bioactive peptides from the immune system of invertebrates.<br />

The different procedures that will be detailed below refer to the<br />

identification and primary structure determination of the Drosophila immuneinduced<br />

peptides (19,20,23,27,30) and of bioactive peptides from the immune<br />

system of other Diptera (17,21,24,31). These approaches were also successfully<br />

used for the discovery of bioactive peptides from crustaceans, arachnids,<br />

and mollusks. These methods should be considered as a guideline and not as<br />

the exact procedure to follow (see Note 3). The suggested procedures will<br />

be reported following the normal order of execution, (1) induction of the<br />

immune response by an experimental infection, (2) collection of the immunocompetent<br />

cells (hemocytes), tissues (epithelia, trachea, salivary glands, etc.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!