Scientific Report 2003-2004 - Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research ...
Scientific Report 2003-2004 - Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research ... Scientific Report 2003-2004 - Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research ...
Graham Casey, Ph.D.THE CASEYLABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSMine Cicek, Ph.D.Muzaffer Cicek, Ph.D.Anthony Curran, M.S.Phillippa Neville, Ph.D.LEAD TECHNOLOGISTSarah Plummer, B.S.SENIOR RESEARCHTECHNOLOGISTLisa Krumroy, B.S.RESEARCH TECHNOLOGISTAndrea Moreira, B.S.GRADUATE STUDENTFrederick Schumacher, B.S.COLLABORATORSJames M. Church, M.D. 1Robert W. Haile, Ph.D. 2Eric A. Klein, M.D. 3Noralane M. (Laney) Lindor, M.D. 4Sanford D. Markowitz, Ph.D. 5Nywana Sizemore, Ph.D .6Danny R. Welch, Ph.D. 7John S. Witte, Ph.D. 51Dept. of Colorectal Surgery,CCF2Univ. of Southern California,Los Angeles, CA3Urological Inst., CCF4Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN5Case Western Reserve Univ.,Cleveland, OH6Dept. of Cancer Biol., CCF7Jake Gittlen Cancer Res. Inst.,Coll. of Med., PennsylvaniaState Univ. Hershey, PAThe overall objectives of our laboratoryare to discern molecular genetic mechanisms of cancer development andmetastasis. Areas of interest include theidentification and characterization of tumorsuppressor genes, gene expression profiling, andcancer genetics-epidemiology studies.An important goal of cancer genetics isthe identification of individuals at increasedrisk for developing the disease. We haverecently mapped a hereditary prostate cancergene to chromosomes 16q23 through wholegenomelinkage analyses and loss-of-heterozygositystudies. Furthermore we have determinedthat tumor aggressiveness may also inpart be genetic, as we have identified two loci,on chromosome 19q13.1 and 7q32-q33, thatalso appear to harbor hereditary prostate cancergenes associated with more aggressive cancer atdiagnosis. We are using a range of molecularapproaches to identify and characterize thesegenes.We are also interested in determining therole of low-penetrance gene mutations in risk ofprostate cancer. We recently determined that asingle common variant of the RNASEL genecalled R462Q is associated with up to 13% ofprostate cancers, making it one of the mostfrequent genetic alterations in any of the commoncancers. Nearly 60% of men in the studypossessed at least one copy of the R462Q variant.Men who inherited only one copy of the varianthad a 50% increased risk of prostate cancer,whereas men who inherited two copies had atwo-fold increased risk of prostate cancer. Thismeans that although the effect of carrying theR462Q variant may be relatively small for anindividual, the effect on men’s health overall isThe Department of Cancer BiologyAnalysis IdentifiesGenetic Alterations ofCommon Human Malignanciesvery large due to the frequency of the R462Q variantin the population.We have also found a correlation between somevariants and more aggressive forms of prostate cancer.We have determined that a variant in the cytochromeP450 gene CYP3A4 is associated with more aggressiveprostate cancer in a case-only study of African-American prostate cancer patients. This result hasparticular relevance as African-American men are notonly more prone to prostate cancer but also todeveloping more aggressive forms of the disease.Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are responsiblefor up to 5% of breast cancers. BRCA1 mutationcarriers appear to have a different prognosis fromnon-BRCA1 breast cancer patients. We havedetermined that breast tumorigenesis in BRCA1mutation carriers occurs by a distinct molecularmechanism from that of age-matched nonfamilialcases. Furthermore, our data suggest that age atdiagnosis, possibly related to menopausal status, maybe an important factor in the expression of specificproteins in breast tumors of BRCA1 mutationcarriers. These results may lead to a better understandingof the underlying mechanisms involved inBRCA1-related tumorigenesis.Metastasis, the spread of the primary tumorto a distant site, is the main cause of death fromcancer. We have applied somatic cell approaches toidentify genes associated with metastasis usingAffymetrix GeneChip arrays. We have been usingthe MDA MB 435 metastasis model system. Acomparison of altered gene expression in metastaticand nonmetastatic cells has yielded a number ofcandidate genes that may function as positive(metastatic oncogenes) or negative (metastasissuppressor genes) regulators of metastasis. Thesecandidate genes are being rigorously examined toconfirm their role in the metastatic process.Paris, P.L., Kupelian, P.A., Hall, J.M., Williams, T.L., Levin, H., Klein, E.A., Casey, G., and J.S. Witte(1999) Association between a CYP3A4 genetic variant and clinical presentation in African-Americanprostate cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 8:901-905.Paris, P.L., Witte, J.S., Kupelian, P.A. Levin, H., Klein, E.A., Catalona, W.J., and G. Casey (2000)Identification and fine mapping of a region showing a high frequency of allelic imbalance on chromosome16q23.2 that corresponds to a prostate cancer susceptibility locus. Cancer Res. 60:3645-3649.Vaziri, S.A., Krumroy, L.M., Elson, P., Budd, G.T., Darlington, G., Myles, J., Tubbs, R.R., and G. Casey(2001) Breast tumor immunophenotype of BRCA1 mutation carriers is influenced by age at diagnosis.Clin. Cancer Res. 7:1937-1945.Neville, P.J. Conti, D.V. Paris, P.L., Levin, H., Catalona, W.J., Suarez, B.K., Witte, J.S., and G. Casey(2002) Prostate cancer aggressiveness locus on chromosome 7q32-q33 identified by linkage and allelicimbalance studies. Neoplasia 4:424-431.Casey, G., Neville, P.J., Plummer, S.J., Xiang, Y., Krumroy, L.M., Klein, E.A., Catalona, W.J., Nupponen,N., Carpten, J.D., Trent, J.M., Silverman, R.H., and J.S. Witte (2002) RNASEL Arg462Glnvariant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases. Nature Genet. 32:581-583.50
Our laboratory is interested in understandingthe mechanisms that controlthe balance between proliferation anddifferentiation during development. Our focusis on the ski oncogene family, whose twomembers, ski and sno, encode transcriptionalregulators that can affect both oncogenictransformation andcellular differentiation.We use gene targetingand transgenictechniques to study thedevelopmentalprocesses that requirethe function of ski andsno in mice, as modelsfor human development.Both ski and snohave been shown tofunction as coactivatorsor corepressors,modulatingtranscription byinteracting with severaldifferent transcriptionfactor complexes.Those interacting withski include members ofthe Nuclear Factor I(NFI) family, theretinoic acid receptor,and the nuclearhormone co-regulators NCoR and skip/NCoA62, and members of the Smad genefamily. Their ability to interact with multipletranscription factors, coupled with theirubiquitous expression, suggests that ski and snoare involved in regulating the expression of alarge, diverse group of genes. Therefore, wehave undertaken a genetic approach, introducingmutations into ski and sno genes to uncoverthe developmental pathways that require theirfunctions.A long-standing area of interest in thelaboratory has been the role of the ski genefamily in skeletal muscle differentiation. Bothski and sno have the surprising property ofinducing, simultaneously, both myogenicdetermination and oncogenic transformation.In vivo, overexpression of ski in skeletalmuscles of transgenic mice induces hypertrophyof specific fiber types. In our ski-deficientmice, skeletal muscle development is defective,as shown by a dramatic reduction in skeletalmuscle mass and fiber organization. We arecurrently using these mutant mice to identifyspecific stages during skeletal muscle differentiationthat require ski expression.The Department of Cancer BiologyProto-Oncogenes ski, sno:Global Regulators of Differentiationand DevelopmentA new focus for our laboratory is the studyof craniofacial defects in ski-deficient mice. Wehave found that ski -/- mice show either a neuraltube defect or median facial clefting and that thepenetrance of these two phenotypes is completelydependent on genetic background. Theseresults suggest that mutations in ski may berelevant to humanfacial clefting, whichis one of the mostcommon birthdefects. These dataled us to correctlypredict the involvementof ski in ahuman geneticsyndrome, monsomy1p36, in which theobserved featuresinclude not only facialclefting, but alsoother phenotypes incommon with ski-nullmice, such as musclehypotonia, openfontanels, and adepressed nasalbridge. Our continuingefforts involvemapping of modifierClemencia Colmenares, Ph.D.genes, and searchingfor mutations in skiamong other familieswith facial clefting defects.Because sno has the same activities as skiwhen over-expressed in vitro, and both genes areexpressed ubiquitously, it seemed likely that theywould have overlapping activities. Our analysesof double-mutant mice lacking both ski and snosuggest that, although there is some functionalredundancy, there are also gene-specific functionsthat lead to distinct phenotypes.THE COLMENARESLABORATORYTECHNOLOGISTBinh To, B.S.Yuanhua LiuGRADUATE STUDENTYishi Chen, M.S.COLLABORATORSHeidi Heilstedt, M.D. 1Shunsuke Ishii, Ph.D. 2Sonia Pearson-White, Ph.D. 3Lisa Shaffer, M.D. 1Edward Stavnezer, Ph.D. 41Dept. of Molecular and HumanGenetics, Baylor Coll. ofMed., Houston, TX2RIKEN Tsukuba Life ScienceCtr., Tsukuba, Japan3Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville4Case Western Reserve Univ.,Cleveland, OHBerk, M., Desai, S. Y., Heyman, H. C., and C. Colmenares (1997) Mice lacking theski proto-oncogene have defects in neurulation, craniofacial, patterning, and skeletalmuscle development. Genes Dev. 11:2029-2039.Shinagawa, T., Nomura, T., Colmenares, C., Ohira, M., Nakagawara, A., and S. Ishii(2001) Increased susceptibility to tumorigenesis of ski-deficient heterozygous mice.Oncogene 20:8100-8108.Colmenares, C., Heilstedt, H.A., Shaffer, L.G., Schwartz, S., Berk, M., Murray, J.C.,and E. Stavnezer (2002) Loss of the SKI proto-oncogene in individuals affected with1p36 deletion syndrome is predicted by strain-dependent defects in Ski-/- mice. Nat.Genet. 30:106-109.Dai, P., Shinagawa, T., Nomura, T., Harada, J., Kaul, S.C., Wadhwa, R., Khan, M.M.,Akimaru, H., Sasaki, H., Colmenares, C., and S. Ishii (2002) Ski is involved intranscriptional regulation by the repressor and full-length forms of Gli3. Genes Dev.16:2843-2848.51
- Page 7 and 8: From the Chairman, Board of Governo
- Page 9 and 10: Continued from Page 6sources. The p
- Page 11 and 12: Continued from Page 8initiative rec
- Page 13 and 14: BiomedicalEngineering
- Page 15 and 16: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 17 and 18: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 19 and 20: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 21 and 22: Examples of devices that are being
- Page 23 and 24: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 25 and 26: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 27 and 28: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 29 and 30: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 31 and 32: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 33 and 34: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the
- Page 36 and 37: ORTHOPAEDICBIOLOGY ANDBIOENGINEERIN
- Page 38 and 39: ORTHOPAEDICBIOLOGY ANDBIOENGINEERIN
- Page 40 and 41: ORTHOPAEDICBIOLOGY ANDBIOENGINEERIN
- Page 42 and 43: CONNECTIVETISSUEBIOLOGYTHE MIDURALA
- Page 44 and 45: The Department of Biomedical Engine
- Page 46 and 47: DEPARTMENT OFCANCER BIOLOGYCHAIRMAN
- Page 48 and 49: The Department of Cancer Biology46D
- Page 50 and 51: THE ALMASANLABORATORYVISITING SCHOL
- Page 54 and 55: THE DANESHGARILABORATORYPOSTDOCTORA
- Page 56 and 57: THE ERZURUMLABORATORYRESEARCH ASSOC
- Page 58 and 59: THE HESTONLABORATORYSTAFF SCIENTIST
- Page 60 and 61: The Department of Cancer BiologyIde
- Page 62 and 63: THE SIZEMORELABORATORYRESEARCH FELL
- Page 64 and 65: THE WILLIAMSLABORATORYPROJECT SCIEN
- Page 66 and 67: THE YI LABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL FELLO
- Page 68 and 69: DEPARTMENT OFCELL BIOLOGYINTERIM CH
- Page 70 and 71: The Department of Cell BiologyRole
- Page 72 and 73: THE CHISOLMLABORATORYRESEARCH ASSOC
- Page 74 and 75: THE DRISCOLLLABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL
- Page 76 and 77: THE HAZENLABORATORYRESEARCH ASSOCIA
- Page 78 and 79: The Department of Cell BiologyHyper
- Page 80 and 81: The Department of Cell BiologyRole
- Page 82 and 83: THE J. SMITHLABORATORYTECHNOLOGISTG
- Page 84 and 85: THE WEIMBSLABORATORYPROJECT SCIENTI
- Page 86 and 87: The Department of Cell BiologyCell
- Page 88 and 89: DEPARTMENTOF IMMUNOLOGYCHAIRMANThom
- Page 90 and 91: THE ARONICALABORATORYSENIOR RESEARC
- Page 92 and 93: THE FAIRCHILDLABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL
- Page 94 and 95: THE HAMILTONLABORATORYPROJECT SCIEN
- Page 96 and 97: THE LARNERLABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL FE
- Page 98 and 99: THE M. SIEMIONOWLABORATORYRESEARCH
- Page 100 and 101: The Department of ImmunologyHyaluro
Graham Casey, Ph.D.THE CASEYLABORATORYPOSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSMine Cicek, Ph.D.Muzaffer Cicek, Ph.D.Anthony Curran, M.S.Phillippa Neville, Ph.D.LEAD TECHNOLOGISTSarah Plummer, B.S.SENIOR RESEARCHTECHNOLOGISTLisa Krumroy, B.S.RESEARCH TECHNOLOGISTAndrea Moreira, B.S.GRADUATE STUDENTFrederick Schumacher, B.S.COLLABORATORSJames M. Church, M.D. 1Robert W. Haile, Ph.D. 2Eric A. Klein, M.D. 3Noralane M. (Laney) Lindor, M.D. 4Sanford D. Markowitz, Ph.D. 5Nywana Sizemore, Ph.D .6Danny R. Welch, Ph.D. 7John S. Witte, Ph.D. 51Dept. of Colorectal Surgery,CCF2Univ. of Southern California,Los Angeles, CA3Urological Inst., CCF4Mayo <strong>Clinic</strong>, Rochester, MN5Case Western Reserve Univ.,<strong>Cleveland</strong>, OH6Dept. of Cancer Biol., CCF7Jake Gittlen Cancer Res. Inst.,Coll. of Med., PennsylvaniaState Univ. Hershey, PAThe overall objectives of our laboratoryare to discern molecular genetic mechanisms of cancer development andmetastasis. Areas of interest include theidentification and characterization of tumorsuppressor genes, gene expression profiling, andcancer genetics-epidemiology studies.An important goal of cancer genetics isthe identification of individuals at increasedrisk for developing the disease. We haverecently mapped a hereditary prostate cancergene to chromosomes 16q23 through wholegenomelinkage analyses and loss-of-heterozygositystudies. Furthermore we have determinedthat tumor aggressiveness may also inpart be genetic, as we have identified two loci,on chromosome 19q13.1 and 7q32-q33, thatalso appear to harbor hereditary prostate cancergenes associated with more aggressive cancer atdiagnosis. We are using a range of molecularapproaches to identify and characterize thesegenes.We are also interested in determining therole of low-penetrance gene mutations in risk ofprostate cancer. We recently determined that asingle common variant of the RNASEL genecalled R462Q is associated with up to 13% ofprostate cancers, making it one of the mostfrequent genetic alterations in any of the commoncancers. Nearly 60% of men in the studypossessed at least one copy of the R462Q variant.Men who inherited only one copy of the varianthad a 50% increased risk of prostate cancer,whereas men who inherited two copies had atwo-fold increased risk of prostate cancer. Thismeans that although the effect of carrying theR462Q variant may be relatively small for anindividual, the effect on men’s health overall isThe Department of Cancer BiologyAnalysis IdentifiesGenetic Alterations ofCommon Human Malignanciesvery large due to the frequency of the R462Q variantin the population.We have also found a correlation between somevariants and more aggressive forms of prostate cancer.We have determined that a variant in the cytochromeP450 gene CYP3A4 is associated with more aggressiveprostate cancer in a case-only study of African-American prostate cancer patients. This result hasparticular relevance as African-American men are notonly more prone to prostate cancer but also todeveloping more aggressive forms of the disease.Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are responsiblefor up to 5% of breast cancers. BRCA1 mutationcarriers appear to have a different prognosis fromnon-BRCA1 breast cancer patients. We havedetermined that breast tumorigenesis in BRCA1mutation carriers occurs by a distinct molecularmechanism from that of age-matched nonfamilialcases. Furthermore, our data suggest that age atdiagnosis, possibly related to menopausal status, maybe an important factor in the expression of specificproteins in breast tumors of BRCA1 mutationcarriers. These results may lead to a better understandingof the underlying mechanisms involved inBRCA1-related tumorigenesis.Metastasis, the spread of the primary tumorto a distant site, is the main cause of death fromcancer. We have applied somatic cell approaches toidentify genes associated with metastasis usingAffymetrix GeneChip arrays. We have been usingthe MDA MB 435 metastasis model system. Acomparison of altered gene expression in metastaticand nonmetastatic cells has yielded a number ofcandidate genes that may function as positive(metastatic oncogenes) or negative (metastasissuppressor genes) regulators of metastasis. Thesecandidate genes are being rigorously examined toconfirm their role in the metastatic process.Paris, P.L., Kupelian, P.A., Hall, J.M., Williams, T.L., Levin, H., Klein, E.A., Casey, G., and J.S. Witte(1999) Association between a CYP3A4 genetic variant and clinical presentation in African-Americanprostate cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 8:901-905.Paris, P.L., Witte, J.S., Kupelian, P.A. Levin, H., Klein, E.A., Catalona, W.J., and G. Casey (2000)Identification and fine mapping of a region showing a high frequency of allelic imbalance on chromosome16q23.2 that corresponds to a prostate cancer susceptibility locus. Cancer Res. 60:3645-3649.Vaziri, S.A., Krumroy, L.M., Elson, P., Budd, G.T., Darlington, G., Myles, J., Tubbs, R.R., and G. Casey(2001) Breast tumor immunophenotype of BRCA1 mutation carriers is influenced by age at diagnosis.Clin. Cancer Res. 7:1937-1945.Neville, P.J. Conti, D.V. Paris, P.L., Levin, H., Catalona, W.J., Suarez, B.K., Witte, J.S., and G. Casey(2002) Prostate cancer aggressiveness locus on chromosome 7q32-q33 identified by linkage and allelicimbalance studies. Neoplasia 4:424-431.Casey, G., Neville, P.J., Plummer, S.J., Xiang, Y., Krumroy, L.M., Klein, E.A., Catalona, W.J., Nupponen,N., Carpten, J.D., Trent, J.M., Silverman, R.H., and J.S. Witte (2002) RNASEL Arg462Glnvariant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases. Nature Genet. 32:581-583.50