The Three Basic Facts of Existence II: Suffering (Dukkha) - Buddhist ...
The Three Basic Facts of Existence II: Suffering (Dukkha) - Buddhist ...
The Three Basic Facts of Existence II: Suffering (Dukkha) - Buddhist ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
they are a cause for the arising <strong>of</strong> suffering when they change. 54 <strong>The</strong> (neutral) feeling <strong>of</strong>onlooking-equanimity (upekkhā) and (all) remaining formations belonging to the three planes arecalled “suffering in formations” because they are oppressed by rise and fall. Such … affliction asearache … is called “concealed suffering” because it can be known (in another) only byquestioning, the affliction not being openly evident. Affliction produced by … torture, forexample, is called exposed suffering because it can be known without questioning, the afflictionbeing openly evident; it is also called “evident suffering.“ Except for what is “intrinsicsuffering” all given under the Truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Suffering</strong> beginning with “birth” (see below) is alsocalled indirect suffering because it is the basis for one or other kind <strong>of</strong> suffering. What is calleddirect suffering is “intrinsic suffering.” 55Now all these kinds <strong>of</strong> suffering fall under two main heads: “suffering in formations” (thegeneral “unsatisfactoriness” <strong>of</strong> existence stated as the “characteristic <strong>of</strong> suffering” and as the“Truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Suffering</strong>”) and “unpleasant feeling” (the particular kind <strong>of</strong> feeling that is bodily ormental pain, unpleasant affect). In what follows we shall first define the characteristic and thensee how this is handled descriptively in the Tipiṭaka and its commentaries, after which we shalltouch upon the general aspect <strong>of</strong> suffering as a Noble Truth and its relation to the particularmode <strong>of</strong> unpleasant feeling. However, the subjects <strong>of</strong> Truth and feeling (sacca and vedanā) areproperly outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this article: suffering is only one <strong>of</strong> the four truths and one <strong>of</strong> thethree principal divisions <strong>of</strong> feeling. Lastly, we shall see how suffering is treated as a basis formeditation and judgment. As in the case <strong>of</strong> anicca we shall be concerned mainly withquotations, leaving discussion to the article on Tilakkhaṇa. 56Definitions <strong>of</strong> the Characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dukkha</strong><strong>The</strong> general characteristic <strong>of</strong> suffering is most usually based on that <strong>of</strong> impermanence: “What isimpermanent is suffering” 57 or “Is what is impermanent pleasant or unpleasant?Unpleasant,Lord.” 58 Or else it is defined in its own right: “’<strong>Suffering</strong>, suffering’ is said, Lord; what issuffering?Materiality (rûpa) is suffering, Rādha, and so are feeling, perception, formations, andconsciousness,” 59 and “all is suffering. And what is the all that is suffering? <strong>The</strong> eye is suffering…” 60 or more summarily “All formations are suffering” 61 To these the Canonical commentary,the Paṭisambhidāmagga, adds: “Materiality (etc.) is suffering in the sense <strong>of</strong> fear (that itsimpermanence inspires).” 62This general characteristic, like those <strong>of</strong> impermanence and not-self, is not a part <strong>of</strong> theAbhidhamma system proper, but is rather a summary statement <strong>of</strong> that. <strong>The</strong> strict Abhidhammatreatment, in fact, forms the detailed “analysis and synthesis” <strong>of</strong> the whole process <strong>of</strong> existence,which the three characteristics sum up. In the Abhidhamma, however, it should be noted thatunpleasant bodily feeling (dukkha) is regarded as only associated with body-consciousness(kâya-viññāṇa) and unpleasant mental feeling (domanassa) only with mind-consciousness (manoviññāṇa).<strong>The</strong> impermanence <strong>of</strong> all possible heavenly existences stated in the Dhammahadaya-Vibhaṅga brings these within the range <strong>of</strong> “suffering in formations” without exception.54See MN 44 cited below.55Vism Ch. 16, p. 499.56This article remained unwritten by the late author (Editor).57SN 35:1/S IV 1.58E.g. SN 22:59/ S <strong>II</strong>I 66.59SN 23:15/S <strong>II</strong>I 196.60SN 35:44/S IV 28. See the article on Anicca for parallel quotation “all is impermanent.“61Dhp-a 20, 6/V 278.62Ñáóakathá, Paþis I 37.41