and woe are never right (as they are nearer the concept soka [grief, sorrow] than dukkha). In thisconnection reference may be made to Mrs. Rhys Davids: <strong>Buddhist</strong> Psychology, pp. 83, ff.”Some idea <strong>of</strong> this concept may be formed by referring to the Buddha’s first discourse, theDhammacakkappavattana Sutta. After mentioning that the Noble Eightfold Path is the MiddlePath—majjhimâ paṭipadâ—leading to knowledge and insight, tranquillity, wisdom,enlightenment and Nibbāna, which the Tathāgata has realised having avoided the two extremes<strong>of</strong> self-indulgence and self-mortification, he proceeds to explain the Four Noble Truths <strong>of</strong>dukkha, samudaya, nirodha and magga. <strong>The</strong> explanation given there covers a wide field <strong>of</strong>conditions resulting in dukkha. Birth, old-age, disease, death, union with those who are dislikedby one, separation from those who are liked by one, inability to fulfil one’s wishes, and in brief,the five aggregates <strong>of</strong> grasping, are dukkha. <strong>The</strong> five aggregates (body, feeling, perception,mental formations and consciousness), which make up an individual entity are accompanied bydukkha, as those groups are found in conjunction with âsava (taints) and upādāna (grasping). Itis when we come to the second Noble Truth, the origin <strong>of</strong> dukkha, that we are given a clearerpicture <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> dukkha. Taṇhā, the thirst or fever <strong>of</strong> unsatisfied longing, a state <strong>of</strong> mindthat leads to rebirth, involving attachment to lustful enjoyment is mentioned as the cause <strong>of</strong>dukkha. In other words, this thirst or yearning for sensual enjoyment, generally unfulfilled, isthe cause for the prevalence <strong>of</strong> dukkha. If dukkha was mere pain or misery, the enjoyment <strong>of</strong>worldly pleasures, not all <strong>of</strong> which are spiritually harmful, would certainly not give rise to itunless, <strong>of</strong> course, the enjoyment itself is carried to excesses. Elsewhere, the Buddha mentionsfour truisms (dhammuddesâ) the fourth <strong>of</strong> which is ûno loko atitto taṇhâdâso—“<strong>The</strong> world isdeficient, never contended and a slave to thirst.” 43 This statement sheds much light on themeaning <strong>of</strong> the term dukkha. <strong>The</strong> deficiency and discontent are the direct results <strong>of</strong> thesubjection to taṇhā, they are impelled by taṇhā, the root cause <strong>of</strong> all dukkha. Hence dukkha isthe general discomfort (or dis-ease) or the unsatisfactory nature <strong>of</strong> the world. And this has beenbrought about by the instability <strong>of</strong> the world. <strong>The</strong> world is in a state <strong>of</strong> flux and is unstable:upanīyati loko addhuvo. This is the first <strong>of</strong> the four dhammuddesā just referred to. Taṇhā, which isthe cause <strong>of</strong> dukkha, is threefold: kāmataṇhā, bhavataṇhā, vibhavataṇhā, the thirst for sensualenjoyment, for existence and for annihilation, respectively. Any one or more <strong>of</strong> these three canbring about dukkha. <strong>The</strong> elimination or the complete abandonment <strong>of</strong> taṇhā is the cessation <strong>of</strong>dukkha. Hence there is no dukkha in the absence <strong>of</strong> taṇhā, and the path leading to the cessation<strong>of</strong> dukkha is the Noble Eightfold Path.Thus dukkha is not mere pain or misery but a concept <strong>of</strong> widest range, and it is <strong>of</strong> the highestsignificance in the <strong>Buddhist</strong> Teachings. It is the recognition <strong>of</strong> dukkha that makes Nibbānapossible. Ignorance <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> dukkha is the ignorance <strong>of</strong> the most fundamentalnature <strong>of</strong> the world. Ignorance (avijjā) is the starting point as it were <strong>of</strong> the continuity in saṃsāra.<strong>Dukkha</strong> may be compared to a disease. <strong>The</strong> ignorance <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the disease makes nocure possible let alone its diagnosis and method <strong>of</strong> treatment. This simple analogy from medicalscience holds good as regards the formulation <strong>of</strong> the Four Noble Truths. It requires the uniquephysician in the person <strong>of</strong> the Tathāgata to discover the prevalence <strong>of</strong> this disease. <strong>The</strong> firsttruth has been discovered by the Buddha, but this alone serves no purpose, just as theknowledge <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> a disease is <strong>of</strong> no great help unless and until the administration<strong>of</strong> the cure is effected. To effect a cure the symptoms have to be studied and the cause <strong>of</strong> thedisease has to be found out. From the known symptoms such as “birth is suffering” etc. thecause <strong>of</strong> the disease is diagnosed as taṇhā, craving. In the so-called “chain” <strong>of</strong> paṭiccasamuppāda,vedanā, (sensations) give rise to taṇhā (craving). <strong>The</strong> next step is upādāna, (grasping) resulting inbhava, (becoming) and its concomitant, dukkha. Once the causes are known a cure has to be43Raþþhapála Sutta <strong>of</strong> the Majjhima Nikáya (M <strong>II</strong> 68).20
found and the administration <strong>of</strong> the medicine to bring about the cure is the final step. <strong>The</strong> Pathleading to the cessation <strong>of</strong> dukkha, i.e. the Noble Eightfold Path is the cure to this disease.Besides <strong>of</strong> being assigned the position <strong>of</strong> the first Noble Truth, dukkha also stands as one <strong>of</strong>the three characteristics (tilakkhaṇa) the basic premises as it were, <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Buddhist</strong> Teachings.Unlike most propositions in outside systems <strong>of</strong> philosophy, the three characteristics areformulated by inductive reasoning based on observable facts. <strong>The</strong> five aggregates are seen to beimpermanent (anicca) and that which is impermanent is dukkha and subject to change. Thatwhich is dukkha and subject to change cannot be identified as one’s own and is lacking in apermanent entity. This is discussed fully in the Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta, 44 that followed theBuddha’s First Sermon.<strong>The</strong> foregoing remarks, though discursive and somewhat superficial when the whole subjectis taken into account, are meant to serve as an introduction to our study <strong>of</strong> this all-importantconcept. As pointed out earlier, the aim <strong>of</strong> the true <strong>Buddhist</strong> is to overcome dukkha andsurmount the ills that flesh is heir to. <strong>The</strong> problem before the disciple <strong>of</strong> the Buddha is to makean end <strong>of</strong> dukkha. <strong>The</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> dukkha, i.e. dukkhakkhaya, consists <strong>of</strong> nirodha or Nibbâna.All the efforts <strong>of</strong> the disciple are to be directed to this end. <strong>The</strong> Noble Eightfold Path divided intomorality, concentration and wisdom, and the complex system <strong>of</strong> training (sikkhā) are designed for thispurpose. It is <strong>of</strong> the person who has achieved this end that one is able to say: “Birth isexhausted, the Holy Life has been lived out, what was to be done is done, there is no more <strong>of</strong>this to come.”—Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. A Jayawickrama44See Wheel No. 17.21