(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3<br />
Table 3.5: Operating conditions and electricity consumption <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> electrolysis<br />
cells in EU-27 and EFTA countries<br />
Parameter Unit<br />
Mercury cell technique ( 1 )<br />
Min. Max. Average Median<br />
Theoretical voltage V 3.15<br />
Current density min. kA/m 2<br />
2.2 ND 5.5 4.5<br />
Current density max. kA/m 2<br />
ND 14.5 10.2 10.7<br />
Cell voltage min. V 3.15 ND 3.67 3.61<br />
Cell voltage max. V ND 4.80 4.15 4.18<br />
Electrical energy use<br />
<strong>for</strong> electrolysis<br />
(alternating current)<br />
AC kWh/t<br />
Cl2<br />
3024 4400 3424 3401<br />
Diaphragm cell technique ( 2 Parameter Unit<br />
Min.<br />
)<br />
Max. Average Median<br />
Theoretical voltage V 2.35<br />
Current density min. kA/m 2<br />
0.8 ND 1.1 1.1<br />
Current density max. kA/m 2<br />
ND 2.7 2.0 1.9<br />
Cell voltage min. V 2.9 ND 2.98 2.99<br />
Cell voltage max. V ND 3.60 3.44 3.48<br />
Electrical energy use<br />
<strong>for</strong> electrolysis<br />
(alternating current)<br />
AC kWh/t<br />
Cl2<br />
2621 3134 2807 2770<br />
Membrane cell technique (monopolar and bipolar) ( 3 Parameter Unit<br />
)<br />
Min. Max. Average Median<br />
Theoretical voltage V 2.35<br />
Current density min. kA/m 2<br />
1.0 ND 2.7 2.6<br />
Current density max. kA/m 2<br />
ND 6.5 5.1 5.5<br />
Cell voltage min. V 2.35 ND 2.89 2.90<br />
Cell voltage max. V ND 4.00 3.40 3.38<br />
Electrical energy use<br />
<strong>for</strong> electrolysis<br />
(alternating current)<br />
AC kWh/t<br />
Cl2<br />
2279 3000 2618 2600<br />
( 1 ) Data from 34 mercury cell plants. <strong>Reference</strong> year 2008: 34 plants. 29 plants measured electricity consumption,<br />
4 plants estimated it and 1 plant did not provide in<strong>for</strong>mation if data were measured or estimated.<br />
( 2 ) Data from 6 diaphragm cell plants. <strong>Reference</strong> year 2008: 6 plants. 5 plants measured electricity consumption<br />
and 1 plant did not provide in<strong>for</strong>mation if data were measured or estimated.<br />
( 3 ) Data from 40 membrane cell plants (monopolar and bipolar). <strong>Reference</strong> year 2008: 35 plants; reference year<br />
2009: 4 plants; reference year 2010: 1 plant. 32 plants measured electricity consumption, 6 plants estimated it<br />
and 2 plants did not provide in<strong>for</strong>mation if data were measured or estimated.<br />
NB: ND = no data available.<br />
Source: [ 58, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2010 ]<br />
3.3.4.3.2 Energy consumption <strong>of</strong> mercury cells<br />
WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />
The mercury cell technique is characterised by <strong>the</strong> highest electrical energy consumption<br />
ranging from approximately 3000 to 4400 AC kWh/t Cl2 produced, <strong>the</strong> median being<br />
approximately 3400 AC kWh/t Cl2 produced with current densities ranging from<br />
2.2 – 14.5 kA/m 2 (Table 3.5). The increased electrical energy consumption is due to <strong>the</strong> higher<br />
value <strong>of</strong> U0 compared to diaphragm and membrane cells which is <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different<br />
cathodic reaction. The factor K ranges from 0.085 – 0.11 V·m 2 /kA and is lower than <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r cell techniques as <strong>the</strong>re is no physical separator between <strong>the</strong> electrodes. The median <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
minimum and maximum current densities used are 4.5 and 10.7 kA/m 2 , respectively<br />
[ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ], [ 63, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2010 ].<br />
The voltage increases with a greater is increased with increasing distance between <strong>the</strong> anode and<br />
<strong>the</strong> cathode, resulting in higher electrical energy consumption. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a close<br />
74 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1