26.11.2012 Views

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

3.2 Overall Overview <strong>of</strong> emission and consumption levels <strong>of</strong><br />

all cell plants<br />

Emission and consumption levels Inputs and pollutant outputs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> industry are<br />

quite specific to <strong>the</strong> cell technique technology used but also depend on <strong>the</strong> specifications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

products (O2 or CO2 content, <strong>for</strong> example), <strong>the</strong> purity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incoming salt and <strong>the</strong> geographical<br />

location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plant. The inputs are primarily salt and water as feedstock, acids and chemical<br />

precipitants used to remove impurities in <strong>the</strong> input brine or output chlorine/caustic soda, as well<br />

as refrigerants cooling agents (CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs, ammonia, etc.) <strong>for</strong> liquefying and<br />

purifying <strong>the</strong> chlorine gas produced. The chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> process needs huge amounts <strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

and electrical energy is a major input.<br />

The main pollutant outputs which are common to all three electrolytic processes are emissions<br />

<strong>of</strong> chlorine and refrigerants to air, emissions <strong>of</strong> noise, emissions <strong>of</strong> free oxidants, chlorate,<br />

bromate, chloride, sulphate and halogenated organic compounds to water as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

generation <strong>of</strong> spent acids from chlorine drying and sludges from brine purification. chlorine gas<br />

emissions, spent acids, cooling agents, impurities removed from <strong>the</strong> input salt or brine.<br />

The major pollutant in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental impact, originating from <strong>the</strong> mercury cell<br />

technique amalgam technology, is mercury. Due to <strong>the</strong> process characteristics, mercury can be<br />

released emitted from <strong>the</strong> process to through air, water, wastes and in <strong>the</strong> products. The<br />

diaphragm cell and membrane cell techniques are more concerned with spent materials<br />

generation, such as asbestos waste in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> asbestos diaphragms. because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cell materials needed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> process. In <strong>the</strong> diaphragm process, deterioration<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asbestos-based diaphragms is <strong>the</strong> main reason <strong>for</strong> cell renewal. In view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

exposure <strong>of</strong> employees to asbestos and releases into <strong>the</strong> environment, special care must be<br />

taken. In addition, <strong>the</strong> improvement in cell component materials such as metal anodes and<br />

modified diaphragms, which are more stable, has helped to reduce <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> undesirable<br />

and polluted by-products. {This in<strong>for</strong>mation is too detailed <strong>for</strong> an introducing section.}<br />

Mercury outputs have decreased in <strong>the</strong> last twenty years as amalgam cell plant operators have<br />

been more active in reducing mercury emissions, although <strong>the</strong> attention paid to this may vary<br />

from one country to ano<strong>the</strong>r. According to Euro <strong>Chlor</strong>, mercury emissions to air and water per<br />

tonne chlorine capacity in western Europe were 27 g in 1977, 8 g in 1987 and around 2 g in<br />

1997. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> industry moved away in <strong>the</strong> 1990s from <strong>the</strong> mercury process to <strong>the</strong> more<br />

efficient (in terms <strong>of</strong> material and energy inputs and outputs) membrane cell process (first<br />

European membrane plant in 1983 at Akzo in Rotterdam). {The in<strong>for</strong>mation was updated and<br />

moved to Section 3.5.5.}<br />

Table 3.1 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main emission and consumption levels inputs and outputs <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> three chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> techniques technologies, using a brine recirculation process. The<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is collected from available sources and is not complete. <strong>Chlor</strong>ine liquefaction is not<br />

included, nor are emissions from cooling systems. This table represents a summary <strong>of</strong><br />

Chapter 3.<br />

WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />

64 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!