(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ... (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

eippcb.jrc.es
from eippcb.jrc.es More from this publisher
26.11.2012 Views

Chapter 4 4.5.4.3 Soil washing Description This technique consists in mixing contaminated soil with water and subsequently separating the fine particle fraction to which the mercury is attached. Elemental mercury is also separated from the bulk of the soil. Technical description A summary description is provided in Table 4.24. Prior to washing, the soil is typically screened to remove oversized particles and then homogenised. The soil is then mixed with a wash solution of water or water enhanced with chemical additives such as leaching agents, surfactants, acids, or chelating agents to help remove organic compounds and heavy metals. Particles are separated by size (cyclone or gravity separation, depending on the type of contaminants in the soil and the particle size), concentrating the contaminants in the fine particle fraction which requires further treatment. The coarser-grained soil is relatively clean, usually requiring no additional treatment. Wash water from the process is treated and either reused in the process or disposed of (Figure 4.11) [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Source: [ 266, US EPA 2007 ] Figure 4.11: Flow diagram of a soil washing system Achieved environmental benefits The achieved environmental benefit of this technique is the decontamination of soil. Environmental performance and operational data At the Orica chlor-alkali plant in Sydney (Australia), soil washing trials were carried out in 2008 and a full-scale system was put into operation in May 2011. The washing included five steps: WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS 1. Screening to remove coarse material (diameter > 10 cm); 2. Washing with water which removes particles and elemental mercury droplets with diameters > 6 mm; 3. Processing of the aqueous fraction from step 2 in a rotary separator with removal of the elemental mercury; 4. Screening of the remaining material through two sieves ('sand' 0.18 – 6 mm and 'silt' 0.04 – 0.18 mm); 5. Dewatering of slurry from step 4 in a centrifuge. 264 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1

Chapter 4 However, the soil washing plant was not able to sustain adequate reliable operations and Orica decided to suspend the operations in 2011 [ 247, Orica 2011 ]. At a mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Squamish/British Columbia (Canada), a total of 150 kt of mercury-contaminated soil and sludge were excavated from 1999 – 2003. While the heavily contaminated soil was stabilised and shipped for disposal, the less severely contaminated soil was washed on site and reused as backfill [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ]. In the United States, a full-scale decontamination was carried out in 1993 at a waste processing and recycling facility with approximately 10 000 m 3 of soil. The washing consisted of screening, separation and froth flotation. The concentrations of mercury could be reduced from 100 mg/kg to 1 mg/kg [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Cross-media effects Some raw materials and energy are consumed for the construction and operation of the washing system. Additional emissions may result from the mobilisation of pollutants which have negative effects on health and safety. Washing implies generating a contaminated waste water stream that has to be treated. Any recovered metallic mercury or mercury-containing wastes from the treatment of exhaust gases and waste water require further treatment and/or safe disposal. Technical considerations relevant to applicability Soil washing requires the excavation of soil which may be restricted by existing buildings and underground equipment. Economics {Please TWG provide information.} Driving force for implementation The driving force for implementation of this technique is environmental legislation. Example plants Orica mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Sydney (Australia) [ 247, Orica 2011 ]; Nexen mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Squamish/British Columbia (Canada); in operation 1960 – 1991, capacity unknown [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ]; Several full scale and pilot applications in the United States [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Reference literature [ 247, Orica 2011 ], [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ], [ 266, US EPA 2007 ] WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1 December 2011 265

Chapter 4<br />

4.5.4.3 Soil washing<br />

Description<br />

This technique consists in mixing contaminated soil with water and subsequently separating <strong>the</strong><br />

fine particle fraction to which <strong>the</strong> mercury is attached. Elemental mercury is also separated from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil.<br />

Technical description<br />

A summary description is provided in Table 4.24. Prior to washing, <strong>the</strong> soil is typically screened<br />

to remove oversized particles and <strong>the</strong>n homogenised. The soil is <strong>the</strong>n mixed with a wash<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> water or water enhanced with chemical additives such as leaching agents,<br />

surfactants, acids, or chelating agents to help remove organic compounds and heavy metals.<br />

Particles are separated by size (cyclone or gravity separation, depending on <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminants in <strong>the</strong> soil and <strong>the</strong> particle size), concentrating <strong>the</strong> contaminants in <strong>the</strong> fine particle<br />

fraction which requires fur<strong>the</strong>r treatment. The coarser-grained soil is relatively clean, usually<br />

requiring no additional treatment. Wash water from <strong>the</strong> process is treated and ei<strong>the</strong>r reused in<br />

<strong>the</strong> process or disposed <strong>of</strong> (Figure 4.11) [ 266, US EPA 2007 ].<br />

Source: [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]<br />

Figure 4.11: Flow diagram <strong>of</strong> a soil washing system<br />

Achieved environmental benefits<br />

The achieved environmental benefit <strong>of</strong> this technique is <strong>the</strong> decontamination <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />

Environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance and operational data<br />

At <strong>the</strong> Orica chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> plant in Sydney (Australia), soil washing trials were carried out in<br />

2008 and a full-scale system was put into operation in May 2011. The washing included five<br />

steps:<br />

WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />

1. Screening to remove coarse material (diameter > 10 cm);<br />

2. Washing with water which removes particles and elemental mercury droplets with<br />

diameters > 6 mm;<br />

3. Processing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aqueous fraction from step 2 in a rotary separator with removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

elemental mercury;<br />

4. Screening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining material through two sieves ('sand' 0.18 – 6 mm and 'silt'<br />

0.04 – 0.18 mm);<br />

5. Dewatering <strong>of</strong> slurry from step 4 in a centrifuge.<br />

264 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!