(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ... (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
Chapter 4 4.5.4.3 Soil washing Description This technique consists in mixing contaminated soil with water and subsequently separating the fine particle fraction to which the mercury is attached. Elemental mercury is also separated from the bulk of the soil. Technical description A summary description is provided in Table 4.24. Prior to washing, the soil is typically screened to remove oversized particles and then homogenised. The soil is then mixed with a wash solution of water or water enhanced with chemical additives such as leaching agents, surfactants, acids, or chelating agents to help remove organic compounds and heavy metals. Particles are separated by size (cyclone or gravity separation, depending on the type of contaminants in the soil and the particle size), concentrating the contaminants in the fine particle fraction which requires further treatment. The coarser-grained soil is relatively clean, usually requiring no additional treatment. Wash water from the process is treated and either reused in the process or disposed of (Figure 4.11) [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Source: [ 266, US EPA 2007 ] Figure 4.11: Flow diagram of a soil washing system Achieved environmental benefits The achieved environmental benefit of this technique is the decontamination of soil. Environmental performance and operational data At the Orica chlor-alkali plant in Sydney (Australia), soil washing trials were carried out in 2008 and a full-scale system was put into operation in May 2011. The washing included five steps: WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS 1. Screening to remove coarse material (diameter > 10 cm); 2. Washing with water which removes particles and elemental mercury droplets with diameters > 6 mm; 3. Processing of the aqueous fraction from step 2 in a rotary separator with removal of the elemental mercury; 4. Screening of the remaining material through two sieves ('sand' 0.18 – 6 mm and 'silt' 0.04 – 0.18 mm); 5. Dewatering of slurry from step 4 in a centrifuge. 264 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1
Chapter 4 However, the soil washing plant was not able to sustain adequate reliable operations and Orica decided to suspend the operations in 2011 [ 247, Orica 2011 ]. At a mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Squamish/British Columbia (Canada), a total of 150 kt of mercury-contaminated soil and sludge were excavated from 1999 – 2003. While the heavily contaminated soil was stabilised and shipped for disposal, the less severely contaminated soil was washed on site and reused as backfill [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ]. In the United States, a full-scale decontamination was carried out in 1993 at a waste processing and recycling facility with approximately 10 000 m 3 of soil. The washing consisted of screening, separation and froth flotation. The concentrations of mercury could be reduced from 100 mg/kg to 1 mg/kg [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Cross-media effects Some raw materials and energy are consumed for the construction and operation of the washing system. Additional emissions may result from the mobilisation of pollutants which have negative effects on health and safety. Washing implies generating a contaminated waste water stream that has to be treated. Any recovered metallic mercury or mercury-containing wastes from the treatment of exhaust gases and waste water require further treatment and/or safe disposal. Technical considerations relevant to applicability Soil washing requires the excavation of soil which may be restricted by existing buildings and underground equipment. Economics {Please TWG provide information.} Driving force for implementation The driving force for implementation of this technique is environmental legislation. Example plants Orica mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Sydney (Australia) [ 247, Orica 2011 ]; Nexen mercury cell chlor-alkali site in Squamish/British Columbia (Canada); in operation 1960 – 1991, capacity unknown [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ]; Several full scale and pilot applications in the United States [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]. Reference literature [ 247, Orica 2011 ], [ 264, British Columbia Ministry 2009 ], [ 266, US EPA 2007 ] WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1 December 2011 265
- Page 229 and 230: Chapter 4 Table 4.17: Monitoring te
- Page 231 and 232: Chapter 4 Environmental performance
- Page 233 and 234: Environmental performance and opera
- Page 235 and 236: Chapter 4 Prevention of chlorine re
- Page 237 and 238: Chapter 4 Good pipework design to m
- Page 239 and 240: Chapter 4 was the solution at that
- Page 241 and 242: differential pressure at inlet and
- Page 243 and 244: Chapter 4 chlorine scrubber, immedi
- Page 245 and 246: Chapter 4 Achieved environmental be
- Page 247 and 248: {Please TWG provide more informatio
- Page 249 and 250: environmental legislation; generati
- Page 251 and 252: Chapter 4 Table 4.21: Examples of o
- Page 253 and 254: Chapter 4 Driving force for impleme
- Page 255 and 256: 4.3.6.3.4 Catalytic decomposition r
- Page 257 and 258: Chapter 4 In both cases, the spent
- Page 259 and 260: Chapter 4 Example plants Thermal de
- Page 261 and 262: Chapter 4 migration of hydroxide io
- Page 263 and 264: eduction of chlorate emissions; red
- Page 265 and 266: Example plants Solvin in Antwerp-Li
- Page 267 and 268: eduction of costs related to equipm
- Page 269 and 270: Chapter 4 Off-site reconcentration
- Page 271 and 272: Chapter 4 b) closing of doors and w
- Page 273 and 274: 4.4 Membrane cell plants 4.4.1 High
- Page 275 and 276: 4.5.3 Containment Chapter 4 Descrip
- Page 277 and 278: Chapter 4 Sections 4.5.4.2 and 4.5.
- Page 279: Chapter 4 At this site, mercury con
- Page 283 and 284: 5 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES Scope
- Page 285 and 286: General considerations In these BAT
- Page 287 and 288: 5.2 Decommissioning of mercury cell
- Page 289 and 290: 5.3 Environmental management system
- Page 291 and 292: Chapter 5 The BAT-associated enviro
- Page 293 and 294: Chapter 5 6. In order to reduce ene
- Page 295 and 296: 5.6 Monitoring of emissions Chapter
- Page 297 and 298: [This BAT conclusion is based on in
- Page 299 and 300: 5.9 Generation of waste Chapter 5 1
- Page 301 and 302: 5.11 Site remediation Chapter 5 20.
- Page 303 and 304: Chapter 5 inorganic chloramines, di
- Page 305 and 306: 6 EMERGING TECHNIQUES 6.1 Introduct
- Page 307 and 308: Chapter 6 cooperation with the Japa
- Page 309 and 310: Chapter 6 In December 1998 a test w
- Page 311 and 312: 6.3 Use of fuel cells in chlor-alka
- Page 313 and 314: Chapter 6 hydrogen that is burnt to
- Page 315 and 316: Chapter 7 7 CONCLUDING REMARKS AND
- Page 317 and 318: REFERENCES References [1] Ullmann's
- Page 319 and 320: References [63] Euro Chlor, Euro Ch
- Page 321 and 322: References [112] Santorelli et al.,
- Page 323 and 324: References [161] Germany, 'Verordnu
- Page 325 and 326: [212] Florkiewicz, Long life diaphr
- Page 327 and 328: References [259] Rappe et al., 'Lev
- Page 329 and 330: GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Chapter 4<br />
4.5.4.3 Soil washing<br />
Description<br />
This technique consists in mixing contaminated soil with water and subsequently separating <strong>the</strong><br />
fine particle fraction to which <strong>the</strong> mercury is attached. Elemental mercury is also separated from<br />
<strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil.<br />
Technical description<br />
A summary description is provided in Table 4.24. Prior to washing, <strong>the</strong> soil is typically screened<br />
to remove oversized particles and <strong>the</strong>n homogenised. The soil is <strong>the</strong>n mixed with a wash<br />
solution <strong>of</strong> water or water enhanced with chemical additives such as leaching agents,<br />
surfactants, acids, or chelating agents to help remove organic compounds and heavy metals.<br />
Particles are separated by size (cyclone or gravity separation, depending on <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />
contaminants in <strong>the</strong> soil and <strong>the</strong> particle size), concentrating <strong>the</strong> contaminants in <strong>the</strong> fine particle<br />
fraction which requires fur<strong>the</strong>r treatment. The coarser-grained soil is relatively clean, usually<br />
requiring no additional treatment. Wash water from <strong>the</strong> process is treated and ei<strong>the</strong>r reused in<br />
<strong>the</strong> process or disposed <strong>of</strong> (Figure 4.11) [ 266, US EPA 2007 ].<br />
Source: [ 266, US EPA 2007 ]<br />
Figure 4.11: Flow diagram <strong>of</strong> a soil washing system<br />
Achieved environmental benefits<br />
The achieved environmental benefit <strong>of</strong> this technique is <strong>the</strong> decontamination <strong>of</strong> soil.<br />
Environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance and operational data<br />
At <strong>the</strong> Orica chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> plant in Sydney (Australia), soil washing trials were carried out in<br />
2008 and a full-scale system was put into operation in May 2011. The washing included five<br />
steps:<br />
WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />
1. Screening to remove coarse material (diameter > 10 cm);<br />
2. Washing with water which removes particles and elemental mercury droplets with<br />
diameters > 6 mm;<br />
3. Processing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aqueous fraction from step 2 in a rotary separator with removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
elemental mercury;<br />
4. Screening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining material through two sieves ('sand' 0.18 – 6 mm and 'silt'<br />
0.04 – 0.18 mm);<br />
5. Dewatering <strong>of</strong> slurry from step 4 in a centrifuge.<br />
264 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1