(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ... (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
Chapter 4 Example plants High-performance membranes are generally used by membrane cell chlor-alkali plants. Reference literature [ 3, Euro Chlor 2011 ], [ 22, Uhde 2009 ], [ 26, Euro Chlor 2010 ], [ 63, Euro Chlor 2010 ], [ 136, Asahi Kasei 2008 ], [ 188, DuPont 2006 ], [ 189, Nitini 2011 ], [ 203, Eckerscham 2011 ], [ 204, Asahi Glass 2011 ] 4.3.2.3.4 High-performance electrodes and coatings Description This technique consists in using electrodes and coatings with improved gas release (low bubble overpotential), small gap between the electrodes (diaphragm cell technique: Q 3 mm; membrane cell technique: Q 0.1 mm) and low electrode overpotentials. Technical description As in the development of high-performance membranes, manufacturers are continuously improving the performance of electrodes and coatings. Factors which are taken into account for the electrode structure include current distribution, gas release, ability to maintain structural tolerances, electrical resistance and the practicability of recoating. Coatings are optimised in terms of mechanical and (electro-)chemical robustness as well as low overpotentials [ 21, Kirk-Othmer 1995 ]. In the case of the diaphragm cell technique, the use of the expandable anode (see Section 2.3.2) allows for the creation of a controlled 3-mm gap between the electrodes, thereby reducing energy consumption [ 21, Kirk-Othmer 1995 ]. Coatings used for anodes and cathodes are described in Section 2.3.2. {Please TWG provide more information on the replacement of older anodes by the expandable anode: performance (reduction of cell voltage and energy consumption), technical considerations for retrofitting and economics.} In the case of the membrane cell technique, the most important aspects of the electrode structures are the need to support the membrane and the gas release to the back of the electrode surface. The latter aims at reducing the electrical resistance caused by gas bubbles [ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ]. {Please TWG provide information on the development of electrode coatings in membrane cells.} Achieved environmental benefits The achieved environmental benefit of this technique is a reduction of energy consumption. Environmental performance and operational data The anode coatings of diaphragm cells have a lifetime of more than twelve years and production of chlorine exceeds 240 t Cl2/m 2 [ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ]. WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS The typical lifetimes of anode and cathode coatings of membrane cells exceed eight years [ 22, Uhde 2009 ] [ 134, INEOS 2011 ]. The conversion to asbestos-free diaphragms at Arkema also involved the replacement of anodes and cathodes by expandable anodes and better performing cathodes resulting in an overall reduction of electricity consumption for electrolysis of 3 – 4 % (see Section 4.2.2) [ 31, Euro Chlor 2010 ]. The replacement of anodes in diaphragm cells by expandable anodes typically leads to electricity savings of Q 50 AC kWh/t Cl2 produced [ 3, Euro Chlor 2011 ]. {Please TWG provide information on the performance of electrode coatings in membrane cells.} 202 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1
Chapter 4 Cross-media effects Some raw materials and energy are consumed for the manufacture of the electrodes and coatings. Technical considerations relevant to applicability Generally, there are no technical restrictions to the applicability of this technique for new electrolysis units. In the case of existing electrolysis units, some equipment suppliers offer the possibility to retrofit the cells [ 22, Uhde 2009 ]. The coatings can often be improved depending on their availability from the respective equipment provider [ 63, Euro Chlor 2010 ]. Economics The costs for electrode recoatings may amount to several thousand EUR/m 2 depending on a potential removal of the mesh [ 3, Euro Chlor 2011 ]. Due to investment costs, upgrades of electrodes and coatings are usually carried out when the electrodes require recoating. Driving force for implementation The driving forces for implementation of this technique include the following: recoating of electrodes; reduction of costs related to energy consumption; increased production rate; improvement of product quality; reduction of costs related to equipment and maintenance. Example plants Arkema in Fos-sur-mer (France), chlorine capacity of diaphragm cell unit 150 kt/yr; Arkema in Lavera (France), chlorine capacity of diaphragm cell unit 175 kt/yr. Reference literature [ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ], [ 3, Euro Chlor 2011 ], [ 21, Kirk-Othmer 1995 ], [ 22, Uhde 2009 ], [ 63, Euro Chlor 2010 ], [ 134, INEOS 2011 ] 4.3.2.3.5 High-purity brine Description This technique consists in purifying the brine to a level so that it strictly complies with the manufacturers' specifications of the electrolysis unit, in order to avoid contamination of electrodes and diaphragms/membranes which may increase energy consumption. Technical description Several types of impurities can have a detrimental effect on electrodes, diaphragms and membranes. The membrane cell technique is particularly sensitive to brine impurities (see Table 2.4). The required brine purity is usually set out in the equipment specifications of the manufacturer. WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS Prior to designing the brine purification system, a full characterisation of the brine is usually carried out followed by pilot trials for brine purification. Techniques for the removal of the most important impurities via primary and secondary brine purification are applied in all chlor-alkali plants (see Section 2.5.3). Some specific impurities such as strontium and aluminium can be taken into account during the design of the purification process. The temporary removal of mercury impurities might be necessary in the case of a conversion of a mercury cell plant to a membrane cell plant [ 143, Healy 2011 ]. TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1 December 2011 203
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 4 Table 4.2: Data from the
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 4 environment can be expect
- Page 171 and 172: 4. Plant size Chapter 4 An increase
- Page 173 and 174: Table 4.6: Comparison of reported c
- Page 175 and 176: Chapter 4 Generally, conversion cos
- Page 177 and 178: 4.1.3 Decommissioning 4.1.3.1 Decom
- Page 179 and 180: 3. Emptying of the cells and handli
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 4 Table 4.7: Overview of co
- Page 183 and 184: Table 4.8: Techniques for monitorin
- Page 185 and 186: Chapter 4 Table 4.10: Decommissioni
- Page 187 and 188: 4.2 Diaphragm cell plants 4.2.1 Aba
- Page 189 and 190: Source: [ 146, Arkema 2009 ] Figure
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter 4 diaphragms [ 31, Euro Chl
- Page 193 and 194: Driving force for implementation Th
- Page 195 and 196: Chapter 4 4.2.3 Conversion of asbes
- Page 197 and 198: Chapter 4 directly from the cells.
- Page 199 and 200: 4.3 All Diaphragm and membrane cell
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 4 non-standardised) will be
- Page 203 and 204: Chapter 4 removal of conductive com
- Page 205 and 206: Chapter 4 Cross-media effects Plant
- Page 207 and 208: Environmental performance and opera
- Page 209 and 210: Example plants Dow, Stade (Germany)
- Page 211 and 212: Chapter 4 current density resulting
- Page 213 and 214: Chapter 4 modifications to auxiliar
- Page 215 and 216: Table 4.14: Cost calculation for th
- Page 217: Chapter 4 membrane lifetimes range
- Page 221 and 222: Chapter 4 The drawback of using fer
- Page 223 and 224: Chapter 4 evaporation unit integrat
- Page 225 and 226: Chapter 4 Environmental performance
- Page 227 and 228: Chapter 4 Technical description The
- Page 229 and 230: Chapter 4 Table 4.17: Monitoring te
- Page 231 and 232: Chapter 4 Environmental performance
- Page 233 and 234: Environmental performance and opera
- Page 235 and 236: Chapter 4 Prevention of chlorine re
- Page 237 and 238: Chapter 4 Good pipework design to m
- Page 239 and 240: Chapter 4 was the solution at that
- Page 241 and 242: differential pressure at inlet and
- Page 243 and 244: Chapter 4 chlorine scrubber, immedi
- Page 245 and 246: Chapter 4 Achieved environmental be
- Page 247 and 248: {Please TWG provide more informatio
- Page 249 and 250: environmental legislation; generati
- Page 251 and 252: Chapter 4 Table 4.21: Examples of o
- Page 253 and 254: Chapter 4 Driving force for impleme
- Page 255 and 256: 4.3.6.3.4 Catalytic decomposition r
- Page 257 and 258: Chapter 4 In both cases, the spent
- Page 259 and 260: Chapter 4 Example plants Thermal de
- Page 261 and 262: Chapter 4 migration of hydroxide io
- Page 263 and 264: eduction of chlorate emissions; red
- Page 265 and 266: Example plants Solvin in Antwerp-Li
- Page 267 and 268: eduction of costs related to equipm
Chapter 4<br />
Example plants<br />
High-per<strong>for</strong>mance membranes are generally used by membrane cell chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> plants.<br />
<strong>Reference</strong> literature<br />
[ 3, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ], [ 22, Uhde 2009 ], [ 26, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2010 ], [ 63, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2010 ],<br />
[ 136, Asahi Kasei 2008 ], [ 188, DuPont 2006 ], [ 189, Nitini 2011 ], [ 203, Eckerscham 2011 ],<br />
[ 204, Asahi Glass 2011 ]<br />
4.3.2.3.4 High-per<strong>for</strong>mance electrodes and coatings<br />
Description<br />
This technique consists in using electrodes and coatings with improved gas release (low bubble<br />
overpotential), small gap between <strong>the</strong> electrodes (diaphragm cell technique: Q 3 mm; membrane<br />
cell technique: Q 0.1 mm) and low electrode overpotentials.<br />
Technical description<br />
As in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> high-per<strong>for</strong>mance membranes, manufacturers are continuously<br />
improving <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> electrodes and coatings. Factors which are taken into account <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> electrode structure include current distribution, gas release, ability to maintain structural<br />
tolerances, electrical resistance and <strong>the</strong> practicability <strong>of</strong> recoating. Coatings are optimised in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> mechanical and (electro-)chemical robustness as well as low overpotentials<br />
[ 21, Kirk-Othmer 1995 ].<br />
In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> diaphragm cell technique, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expandable anode (see Section 2.3.2)<br />
allows <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a controlled 3-mm gap between <strong>the</strong> electrodes, <strong>the</strong>reby reducing<br />
energy consumption [ 21, Kirk-Othmer 1995 ]. Coatings used <strong>for</strong> anodes and cathodes are<br />
described in Section 2.3.2.<br />
{Please TWG provide more in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> older anodes by <strong>the</strong> expandable<br />
anode: per<strong>for</strong>mance (reduction <strong>of</strong> cell voltage and energy consumption), technical<br />
considerations <strong>for</strong> retr<strong>of</strong>itting and economics.}<br />
In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> membrane cell technique, <strong>the</strong> most important aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrode<br />
structures are <strong>the</strong> need to support <strong>the</strong> membrane and <strong>the</strong> gas release to <strong>the</strong> back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrode<br />
surface. The latter aims at reducing <strong>the</strong> electrical resistance caused by gas bubbles<br />
[ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ].<br />
{Please TWG provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> electrode coatings in membrane cells.}<br />
Achieved environmental benefits<br />
The achieved environmental benefit <strong>of</strong> this technique is a reduction <strong>of</strong> energy consumption.<br />
Environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance and operational data<br />
The anode coatings <strong>of</strong> diaphragm cells have a lifetime <strong>of</strong> more than twelve years and production<br />
<strong>of</strong> chlorine exceeds 240 t Cl2/m 2 [ 1, Ullmann's 2006 ].<br />
WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />
The typical lifetimes <strong>of</strong> anode and cathode coatings <strong>of</strong> membrane cells exceed eight years [ 22,<br />
Uhde 2009 ] [ 134, INEOS 2011 ].<br />
The conversion to asbestos-free diaphragms at Arkema also involved <strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> anodes<br />
and cathodes by expandable anodes and better per<strong>for</strong>ming cathodes resulting in an overall<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> electricity consumption <strong>for</strong> electrolysis <strong>of</strong> 3 – 4 % (see Section 4.2.2) [ 31, Euro<br />
<strong>Chlor</strong> 2010 ]. The replacement <strong>of</strong> anodes in diaphragm cells by expandable anodes typically<br />
leads to electricity savings <strong>of</strong> Q 50 AC kWh/t Cl2 produced [ 3, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ].<br />
{Please TWG provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on <strong>the</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> electrode coatings in membrane cells.}<br />
202 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1