26.11.2012 Views

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

{A list <strong>of</strong> techniques used on full scale can be found in Section 4.5.4.1.}<br />

3.8.2 Mercury<br />

Chapter 3<br />

The contamination <strong>of</strong> soil with mercury is due to <strong>the</strong> atmospheric deposition as well as to <strong>the</strong><br />

historical disposal <strong>of</strong> graphite sludges from <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> graphite anodes and <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r wastes on<br />

and around <strong>the</strong> site. The mercury may leach from <strong>the</strong> soil and end up in <strong>the</strong> run-<strong>of</strong>f water and<br />

<strong>the</strong> groundwater. Mercury is mostly present in elemental <strong>for</strong>m, but dissolved inorganic and<br />

organically-bound mercury are also present. The redox potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil determines <strong>the</strong><br />

direction <strong>of</strong> conversion [ 245, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2009 ], [ 246, Wanga et al. 2004 ], [ 247, Orica<br />

2011 ].<br />

The soil beneath <strong>the</strong> production units can be contaminated with mercury up to several metres<br />

depth, especially <strong>the</strong> areas beneath <strong>the</strong> cell room and <strong>the</strong> retorting unit where concentrations can<br />

be as high as some g/kg <strong>of</strong> dry soil [ 245, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2009 ].<br />

As far as contamination through atmospheric deposition is concerned, experience has shown<br />

that mercury concentrations in <strong>the</strong> topsoil (~ 30 cm) could vary from some Zg/kg up to some<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> mg/kg within <strong>the</strong> first kilometres downwind from <strong>the</strong> cell room. The prevailing<br />

wind direction has, not suprisingly, a major influence on <strong>the</strong> deposition rates and hence <strong>the</strong><br />

topsoil contamination levels [ 245, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2009 ], [ 249, Biester et al. 2002 ], [ 250, Maserti<br />

and Ferrara 1991 ]. However, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metallic mercury directly or indirectly released to air<br />

from <strong>the</strong> plant is subject to atmospheric long-range transport [ 249, Biester et al. 2002 ]. In some<br />

cases, <strong>the</strong> concentrations in soils due to deposition were reported to reach background levels at a<br />

relative short distance (4 – 5 km from <strong>the</strong> plant) [ 250, Maserti and Ferrara 1991 ], while in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r cases this distance was reported to be as high as 100 km [ 251, Lodenius and Tulisalo<br />

1984 ]. When soluble mercury is bound to organic matter, <strong>the</strong> contamination reached down to<br />

approximately 20 – 50 cm in <strong>the</strong> soil. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, in sandy soils lacking organic matter,<br />

contamination was restricted to <strong>the</strong> upper 5 cm. This means that reactive mercury <strong>for</strong>ms are<br />

effectively retained through sorption on mineral surfaces [ 248, Biester et al. 2002 ].<br />

At some sites, discharge <strong>of</strong> mercury-containing waste water led to contamination <strong>of</strong> river<br />

sediments [ 265, Hissler and Probst 2006 ].<br />

Table 3.34 contains an estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> mercury-contaminated chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> sites<br />

in EU-27 and EFTA countries with estimated contamination levels. The estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> mercury present at contaminated sites varies largely from 3 – 19 kt, <strong>the</strong> median being<br />

estimated to be approximately 10 kt [ 241, COWI 2008 ].<br />

Table 3.34: Estimation <strong>of</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> mercury-contaminated chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> sites in EU-27<br />

and EFTA countries and contamination levels<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> sites<br />

Contamination level<br />

in t <strong>of</strong> mercury per site<br />

Total contamination level<br />

in t <strong>of</strong> mercury<br />

11 – 19 5 – 30 56 – 555<br />

22 – 37 30 – 100 666 – 3 700<br />

22 – 37 100 – 400 2 220 – 14 800<br />

Total 56 – 93 NA 2 942 – 19 055<br />

NB: NA = not applicable.<br />

Source: [ 241, COWI 2008 ]<br />

WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />

Table 3.35 shows examples <strong>of</strong> mercury-contaminated chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> sites in EU-27 and EFTA<br />

countries.<br />

TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1 December 2011 137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!