(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
(BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3<br />
3.5 Emissions Emission and consumption levels and waste<br />
generation from <strong>the</strong> mercury cell technique process<br />
3.5.1 Overview<br />
Emissions and consumption <strong>of</strong> mercury as well as <strong>the</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> mercury-contaminated<br />
waste are specific to <strong>the</strong> mercury cell technique. At present some 12000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> mercury are<br />
contained in mercury cells used <strong>for</strong> chlorine production in <strong>the</strong> EU. This is based on an average<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.8 kg <strong>of</strong> mercury per tonne <strong>of</strong> annual chlorine capacity and an EU mercury cell chlorine<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> 6.9 millions tonnes <strong>of</strong> chlorine per year [Lindley, 1997]. This mercury Mercury is<br />
contained and recycled within <strong>the</strong> chemical process. Never<strong>the</strong>less, due to <strong>the</strong> process<br />
characteristics, mercury emissions to air and water occur and some mercury leaves <strong>the</strong> process<br />
via waste into air, water and also in wastes are generated. Products, mainly caustic soda, and to<br />
a lesser extent hydrogen, contain certain amounts <strong>of</strong> mercury and are treated be<strong>for</strong>e being used<br />
or sold. As regards <strong>the</strong> mercury level in chlorine, it is virtually zero and no mercury removal<br />
processes are used <strong>for</strong> this product. Some emissions occur during <strong>the</strong> decommissioning <strong>of</strong> an<br />
installation or its conversion to <strong>the</strong> membrane cell technique.<br />
Any attempt to draw a balance generally results in a difference between inputs and outputs <strong>of</strong><br />
mercury, ei<strong>the</strong>r positive or negative. This item issue is specifically addressed in Section 3.5.10.<br />
3.5.2 Mercury in cells<br />
At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2010, <strong>the</strong> total chlorine production capacity in EU-27 and EFTA countries based<br />
on <strong>the</strong> mercury cell technique amounted to 3.97 Mt/yr [ 55, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ]. A total <strong>of</strong> 6870 t<br />
<strong>of</strong> metallic mercury were contained in cells and ano<strong>the</strong>r 630 t were stored in facilities on site,<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r as stock <strong>for</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r use or as waste after <strong>the</strong> respective mercury cell unit had ceased to<br />
operate [ 82, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ]. Table 3.22 summarises <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> mercury in cells.<br />
Table 3.22: Amount <strong>of</strong> mercury in cells per annual chlorine production capacity in mercury<br />
cell chlor-<strong>alkali</strong> plants in EU-27 countries in 2010<br />
Amount <strong>of</strong> mercury in cells in kg per tonne <strong>of</strong> annual chlorine capacity ( 1 )<br />
Min. 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile Max.<br />
0.795 1.20 1.39 1.54 2.04 2.54 4.36<br />
( 1 ) 33 data from 33 plants.<br />
Source: [ 55, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ], [ 82, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong> 2011 ]<br />
3.5.3 Reporting <strong>of</strong> figures per chlorine capacity<br />
As With regards to mercury outputs, figures are expressed and reported by <strong>the</strong> industry in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> chlorine capacity ra<strong>the</strong>r than real production. This is quite specific to <strong>the</strong> mercury cell chlor-<br />
WORKING DRAFT IN PROGRESS<br />
<strong>alkali</strong> sector. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrolytic process in itself, mercury emissions are not linked to<br />
production in a linear way. The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emissions are from <strong>the</strong> cell room where <strong>the</strong><br />
absolute amount mainly depends on small leaks or accidental losses and on historical<br />
contamination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building which are mostly independent from <strong>the</strong> production rate. The<br />
emissions are is far more related to dependent on <strong>the</strong> equipment, plant design, maintenance<br />
requirements, pressure and temperature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cell and decomposer denuder [ 83, Euro <strong>Chlor</strong><br />
2010 ].<br />
However, it could be assumed that if half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cells are switched <strong>of</strong>f, <strong>the</strong> reporting <strong>of</strong> figures<br />
per chlorine capacity may be inappropriate this reasoning may be wrong. The industry gives two<br />
main reasons to argue that this is usually not <strong>the</strong> case <strong>for</strong> reporting mercury emissions in terms<br />
104 December 2011 TB/EIPPCB/CAK_Draft_1