11.07.2015 Views

John A. Keel WHY UFOS

John A. Keel WHY UFOS

John A. Keel WHY UFOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Soon after the flap peaked, a statement signed by Hartappeared on page 1 of the San Francisco Call (Sunday,November 29, 1896):I have not seen it [the airship] personally but have talkedwith the man who claims to be the inventor. I have spent severalhours with him. He has shown me drawings and diagrams of hisinvention, and 1 am convinced that they are more adapted forthe purpose for which he claims them than any other inventionmaking such claims that 1 have ever seen I asked thegentleman who claims to be the inventor what his desires werein regard to carrying on the business, and he stated that he didnot desire any money; that he didn't ask or want anyone toinvest in it; that he was not a citizen of California, and that hehad come here to perfect and test his airship I will admitthat this is the first time to my knowledge that anybody hadanything in California in which he did not want anybody toinvest money.According to Hart, the invention operated on gas andelectricity, and the inventor expressed interest in using hismachine to fly to Cuba and drive out the Spaniards. Someof the local newspapers apparently misquoted both Collinsand Hart badly, and this probably led to Hart's issuance ofa signed statement. By the end of November, Collins was sodisgusted that he refused to see reporters or discuss thematter further.The mysterious inventor had managed to single out twoof the most respected men in California. They had, in goodfaith, served as his spokesmen, and their reports werewidely circulated. The flap of that Thanksgiving weeksupported their stories, but the inventor never cameforward to enjoy his triumph. He simply vanished after thesightings subsided.The description of the mystery man—darkcomplexioned,dark-eyed, slight in stature—bears aremarkable resemblance to the numerous descriptions ofthe airship occupants as published five months later duringthe wave of April, 1897. Also, witnesses to some of the 1897landings claimed that the occupants discussed the situationin Cuba. Some of the minor discrepancies in the publishedstories of Hart and Collins may have been journalisticerrors or may have been based on understandablemisinterpretations of the technical data offered by theinventor. Collins thought the objects operated oncompressed air, while Hart said they ran on gas and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!