chapter 4 - DRK

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Strictly under embargo until Wednesday 22 September at 00:01 GMT (02:01 Geneva time)Invest in and maintain critical infrastructure that reduces risk, such as flooddrainage, adjusted where needed to cope with climate change.5. Assess the safety of all schools and health facilities and upgrade these as necessary.192ANNEX 24.6. Apply and enforce realistic, risk-compliant building regulations and landuseplanning principles. Identify safe land for low-income citizens and developupgrading of informal settlements, wherever feasible.7. Ensure education programmes and training on disaster risk reduction are inplace in schools and local communities.8. Protect ecosystems and natural buffers to mitigate floods, storm surges andother hazards to which your city may be vulnerable. Adapt to climate change bybuilding on good risk reduction practices.9. Install early warning systems and emergency management capacities in yourcity and hold regular public preparedness drills.10. After any disaster, ensure that the needs of the survivors are placed at the centreof reconstruction with support for them and their community organizations todesign and help implement responses, including rebuilding homes and livelihoods.Case studiesThe selected case studies illustrate how resilience can be put into practice by focusingon the ten essentials for making cities resilient. These case studies cover a number ofdifferent areas, ranging from risk assessment to risk communication, as well as differentgovernment levels and types of hazard.Essential 1Empowering local government as leaders in disaster reductionand recoveryMunicipal governments of Chincha, Pisco, Cañete and Ica, Peru(From UNISDR, Local Governments and Disaster Risk Reduction – Good practices andlessons learned, Geneva, April 2010.)After the 2007 earthquake in Peru, reconstruction and recovery in the affected regionswere typically fragmented and not well integrated into overall development and riskreduction work. Local government institutions, which were themselves affected bythe quake, were cast into a passive role. A United Nations Development Programme(UNDP) project partnered with municipal governments to help them enhance theirroles as leaders and coordinators of local development and recovery.
Strictly under embargo until Wednesday 22 September at 00:01 GMT (02:01 Geneva time)The UNDP Country Office intervention provided technical disaster risk reductionand recovery assistance to municipal governments. Although the project is a UNDPinitiative, it relied on the unique position of local governments to identify local prioritiesto reduce disaster risk. The municipal governments prioritized four areas, to whichUNDP provided close and permanent guidance: local governance; housing and territorialmanagement; economic reactivation; and information management.Results include the initiation of a process for updating and redesigning the municipalities’development plans (ten years) and annual plans for promoting sustained recoveryand risk reduction as well as the inclusion of development and capacity-buildingissues into the reconstruction, such as livelihoods, gender, information managementand institutional strengthening. Furthermore, the municipal governments’ regulartools and methods, such as their public investments system and information systemsfor monitoring and disseminating information, were improved. Land-use plans wererevised and made risk-sensitive. The comprehensive range of results has been an indicationof what can be achieved by local governments with the right support.Essential 2Changing standards for land-for-housing in NamibiaWindhoek, Namibia(From International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), UrbanDevelopment and Intensive and Extensive Risk, Contribution to the Global AssessmentReport on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2009.)The city authorities in Windhoek recognized that to reach low-income households,they had to cut unit costs in their government-funded serviced-site programme. Thisprogramme had to recover the costs of developing land (both for housing and withinfrastructure to official standards), but this made it too expensive for low-incomegroups. This example from Namibia is interesting in that it shows how a change inapproach by the city government greatly increased the possibilities for low-incomehouseholds to be able to get their own housing.A new government policy, developed with the Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia(a federation of savings groups formed mostly by low-income women), showed awillingness to overturn conventional approaches to standards and regulations, forinstance in plot sizes and in infrastructure standards, to make their serviced sites moreaffordable to low-income households. Plots can be rented, group purchased or leased.Significantly, families are allowed to upgrade services as they can afford to make theinvestments, extending sewerage and water lines from mains provision into theirhomes. Groups that belong to the Shack Dwellers Federation have access to their ownloan fund from which they can borrow for such service improvements, and around1,000 groups have taken such loans at an average household cost of US$ 150. However,this underestimates the number of improvements, because once households haveWorld Disasters Report 2010 – Disaster data193
Page 1 and 2:
Strictly under embargo untilWednesd
Page 4 and 5:
A global humanitarian organizationT
Page 6 and 7:
Strictly under embargo until Wednes
Page 8:
Page 12:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
114CHAPTER 6Strictly under embargo
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
138CHAPTER 7Strictly under embargo
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147: Strictly under embargo until Wednes
Page 194 and 195: 190ANNEX 2Strictly under embargo un
Page 218 and 219: 214INDEXStrictly under embargo unti
Page 220: The International Federationof Red
show all

chapter 4 - DRK

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?