11.07.2015 Views

Principles into practice: A teacher's guide to research evidence on ...

Principles into practice: A teacher's guide to research evidence on ...

Principles into practice: A teacher's guide to research evidence on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AND THEN THEREWERE...THE PRINCIPLES 13Can you boil down the principles of effective teaching and learning <str<strong>on</strong>g>in<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g></str<strong>on</strong>g> ashort and lucid list? Mary James explains how it was d<strong>on</strong>eLearning is more than acquiringnew knowledge and skills. It isalso about making sense of theworld and creating newknowledge. It involves testing newexperience against previouslylearned ways of thinking and doing things,and changing habits of mind. And itinvolves using the ideas of other peopleexpressed through what they say, write ormake. New knowledge is always, in thissense, a joint producti<strong>on</strong>.Developing the 10 principles ofteaching and learning was an act oflearning itself and had thesecharacteristics. As Deputy Direc<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r ofTLRP, with resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for 22 schoolsprojects, <strong>on</strong>e of my tasks was <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> try <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>come <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> some overview of their findingsso that we might be able <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> answer thequesti<strong>on</strong>: What has TLRP found outabout effective teaching and learning inschools? There is still a l<strong>on</strong>g way <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> go withthis but I started by reading the reportsand publicati<strong>on</strong>s that projects hadproduced <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> date and began <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> get a senseof the points of similarity and difference.But then I needed some structure <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>organise these thoughts. I wantedespecially <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> find some way <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>communicate these <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> busy teachers.Andrew Pollard, the ProgrammeDirec<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, had developed a simple way ofarranging ideas: moving out from thoseat the heart of classroom processes (aims,curriculum, teaching, assessment andrelati<strong>on</strong>ships) <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> those that support theseprocesses, such as teacher learning andMary JamesDeputy Direc<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>rTLRP“It’s throughcommunicati<strong>on</strong>that we find outwhat we think”policy structures.“Ten” had a niceres<strong>on</strong>ance so we stuck with that. In theirsimplest form, we chose <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> present theprinciples in the round <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> show that,although there is a logic, there is n<strong>on</strong>ecessary hierarchy.We completed this initial work ratherhurriedly because we wanted <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue theprinciples in a Commentary from theTLRP at the time when the SchoolsWhite Paper, proposing more specialistschools and academies (now theEducati<strong>on</strong> and Inspecti<strong>on</strong>s Act 2006),was being discussed. We especiallywanted <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> emphasise that improvementcomes from teaching and learning ratherthan simply changing school structures.The principles didn’t hit us in sudden“Eureka” bursts; rather, we watchedthemes and overlapping findings emerge.Often they chimed with what we knewfrom prior <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>. For instance, theSPRinG project <strong>on</strong> what makes effectivegroupwork was built <strong>on</strong> the Oracleproject of the 1970s, and their findingssupport the old cliché that two (or evenmore) heads are better than <strong>on</strong>e. Thevalue of thinking with other people isdem<strong>on</strong>strated throughout TLRP’s work,from the high quality talk whichcharacterises the best early years<str<strong>on</strong>g>practice</str<strong>on</strong>g>, as shown by the Effective Preschooland Primary Educati<strong>on</strong> project, <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>the benefits of peer review found byTowards Evidence-Based ScienceEducati<strong>on</strong>. It’s through communicati<strong>on</strong>that we find out what we think.Evidence from numerous projects alsoc<strong>on</strong>firmed the need for c<strong>on</strong>sistent policyframeworks. Repeatedly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>ershave found that teachers’ willingness <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>experiment and their progress inbringing in forms of assessment whichhelp children learn have been inhibitedby a climate of testing and league tables.While Ministers <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e handencourage assessment for learning, <strong>on</strong>the other, they c<strong>on</strong>tinue <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> put pressure<strong>on</strong> schools <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> raise their results in highstakessummative tests. This can militateagainst the use of other, voluntary typesof assessment, even when they are shownnot <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> boost children’s learning skillsand au<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>nomy, but also <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> raise theirscores in nati<strong>on</strong>al exams.So how do we know that the principleswe have pinpointed are universal? Theshort answer is that we can never be sure.As the best scientists will say, knowledge isalways provisi<strong>on</strong>al. However, theprinciples are drawn from a large numberof recent, highly-regarded <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>projects. People seem <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g> find theminteresting and helpful. The first 8,000copies of the Commentary flew off theshelves in a matter of weeks and, and45,000 copies were downloaded from theTLRP website in six m<strong>on</strong>ths.We have asked our project teams <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>critique the principles so that we canrefine them. Some of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>ers haveproblems with the word “should” in eachprinciple, as represented <strong>on</strong> the poster,finding it <str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>o prescriptive, but theyunderstand that teachers seek advice andguidance. So, for now, “should” remains.s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!