Literature ReviewThis review is meant to describe kinds of animalmovement and the relevancy of movementsto corridors to a general audience that maynot have direct experience with wildliferesearch. American Wildlands completed aliterature review of wildlife corridor studiesto better understand the role corridors play inwildlife conservation. We reviewed publishedliterature regarding animal movement in theNorthern Rocky Mountains, including homerange sizes, long distance dispersal, migratorymovements, the effects of fragmentation onmovement patterns, and the need for corridorsin a developing landscape. We touch on thecontroversy behind corridor conservation,provide a summary of where gaps currently existin corridor knowledge, and suggest areas wherefuture research may be directed.METHODS<strong>The</strong> literature search reviewed peer-reviewedpapers and technical publications foundthrough online search engines, library searches,and papers referred to us during our PriorityLinkage Assessment interviews. Papers werereviewed from the following journals: Biological<strong>Conservation</strong>, Bioscience, <strong>Conservation</strong>Biology, Diversity and Distributions, Ecography,Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Journal of AnimalEcology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal ofEnvironmental Management, Journal of <strong>Wildlife</strong>Management, Landscape Ecology, and <strong>Wildlife</strong>Society Bulletin. We also consulted several fulllength texts. <strong>The</strong> search was originally confinedto the years 2002 – 2008. Relevant articleswritten previous to these dates, encountered ascitations in these articles, were also utilized. Wepaid specific attention to research performed inthe U.S. Northern Rocky Mountain region withparticular focus on large mammal work. Bothempirical and theoretical research completedon animals outside of our focal species wereexamined to gain a better understanding of thescientific basis of current corridor and habitatconservation.KINDS OF ANIMAL MOVEMENTAnimal movement is essential for individualand long-term population survival. Movementallows animals to obtain appropriate, adequateand quality nutrients, water, viable mates, andeffective habitat for shelter and raising young.Unfortunately, continued habitat fragmentationposes a formidable barrier to this movement.Appendix 1 identifies animals native to theU.S. Northern Rocky Mountains while Appendix2 defines known home range sizes for thesespecies. Appendix 3 lists known migrationdistances, and Appendix 4 lists known dispersaldistances. Each of these plays a vital role in thelong-term survival of a population. This reviewdiscusses each of these kinds of movement anddetails current knowledge specific to movementand corridor conservation.Home rangeAnimals are able to meet basic needs throughlocal movements made within their home range.Home range is defined as an area normallytraversed by an individual or group of animalsduring activities associated with feeding,resting, reproduction and shelter-seeking(Harestad and Bunnell, 1979). Appendix 2 liststhe known home ranges for U.S. Northern RockyMountain wildlife, while identifying where moreresearch is required.When reviewing the home range of individualspecies, it is important to note the role of aspecies’ territory. While a home range definesthe entire area traversed by an individual orgroup of individuals during their daily activities,the territory for an individual or group ofindividuals is defined as the area of a homerange that they will defend against others ofthe same species (Lincoln et al., 1998). For33
example, if a grizzly bear had a home range of93 square kilometers, it does not necessarilymean that it is essential to conserve 186 squarekilometers of habitat for two grizzly bears,as there is some overlap of home range thatis tolerated within the species. Rather, it isimportant to determine the territory, or theamount of land within the home range, that thegrizzly bear will defend against another grizzlybear. This will provide the minimum amount ofland necessary for two grizzly bears to subsistand coexist in the same general area.MigrationThose animals unable to meet their basicsurvival needs in a single location may traverselong distances to do so. Migration is a seasonal,roundtrip, intra-population movement madeprimarily by resident adults between discreteareas not used at other times of the year(Semlitsch, 2007; Berger 2004). Migrationserves a variety of critical purposes, whichvary by species, subpopulation, year andlocation. Some animals migrate for parturition(birthing) purposes. This occurs when the landupon which a population subsists for much ofthe year is in some way inadequate for raisingyoung (i.e. predation risk for young is high),and, in turn, the land on which the young areborn does not provide adequate sustenanceyear-round (Semlitsch, 2007; Bergerud et al.,1990). <strong>Wildlife</strong> may migrate strictly based uponseasonal availability of food in different locales.This is seen when the summer range does notprovide nourishment for winter survival or viceversa,and is illustrated by migrations of somepronghorn (White et al., 2007; Sawyer et al.,2005), and mule deer (Sawyer et al., 2005;Brown 1992, Thomas and Irby, 1991).Still other wildlife species migrate based upona critical threshold at which point there is apotential for resource depletion. Migration ofsome individuals or an entire population may beseen when a population outgrows an area and itsresources. <strong>The</strong>se are often referred to as partialor adaptive migrations (Alerstam et al., 2003).<strong>The</strong>se migrations have been identified in the U.S.Northern Rockies in populations of pronghorn34(White et al., 2007) and elk (Boyce, 1991;Hebblewhite et al., 2006).Current migratory patterns of animals in theU.S. Northern Rocky Mountain region havechanged due to four main causes (Berger, 2004):1. Intolerance to bison outsideYellowstone National Park;2. Winter feeding of elk;3. Increased human population;4. Habitat loss.DispersalDispersal is an interpopulation, unidirectionalmovement from natal sites with no predictablereturns (Semlitsch, 2007; Sutherland et al.,2000). Dispersal determines population spread,allows for colonization and recolonization offragmented landscapes and encourages geneticflow (Trakhtenbrot et al., 2005; Hoffmanet al., 2006). Dispersal is less a matter ofimmediate individual or species survival, butrather a critical means by which a speciesmaintains long-term survival (Hoehn et al.,2007; Brown and Kodric-Brown, 1977). In fact,dispersing animals are less likely to survivethan their counterparts remaining in familiarterritory. Dispersing individuals are at a higherrisk of encountering human development androads, new predators, and low quality food intheir travels. Dispersal may prove ever moreimportant with increased fragmentation as ameans to maintain population viability throughgenetic flow.HABITAT FRAGMENTATIONResearch has indicated that the ability tomove across the landscape is necessary forlong-term population survival of species.Habitat fragmentation is thought to seriouslyimpair animal movement across the regionallandscape. Social and cultural pressures demandthat conservation and resource managementgroups bear the burden of proof thatfragmentation is occurring (due to both naturaland anthropogenic factors), that it impedesanimal movement across the landscape, and
- Page 5 and 6: Executive SummaryMaintaining the ec
- Page 7 and 8: Map 1. The Hub Conservation Area ma
- Page 9 and 10: Map 3. Major elk linkages identifie
- Page 12 and 13: Map 6. Major mule deer linkages ide
- Page 14 and 15: Map 8. Major wolf linkages identifi
- Page 16 and 17: Map 10. Major grizzly bear linkages
- Page 18 and 19: For information regarding contents
- Page 20 and 21: American Wildlands’ PriorityLinka
- Page 22 and 23: Georgetown Lake,photo by Grace Hamm
- Page 24 and 25: Beaverhead Mountains to the south,
- Page 26 and 27: with mountainous wet meadows and ri
- Page 28 and 29: irds). This step was repeated for c
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 4. Hierarchical breakdown of
- Page 32 and 33: sanitation and conflict issues betw
- Page 36 and 37: that this impediment is deleterious
- Page 38 and 39: may not provide functional connecti
- Page 40 and 41: available during dispersal, and new
- Page 43 and 44: and desert; this reflects overall a
- Page 45 and 46: Photo by Denver Bryanpopulations. L
- Page 47 and 48: Mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus)
- Page 49 and 50: GUIDE TO READINGPRIORITY LINKAGE AS
- Page 51 and 52: Absaroka to CraziesSpeciesGeographi
- Page 53 and 54: BangtailsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 55 and 56: Bear CreekSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 58 and 59: Big BeltsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 60 and 61: to disease transmission between dom
- Page 62: sightings in the Birch Creek area.
- Page 65 and 66: Elk move within this linkage for wi
- Page 67: south of the linkage area.Wolverine
- Page 70 and 71: ange for about 200 elk, and the Spr
- Page 72: winter range is private land on the
- Page 75: e using the Little Belt Mountains,
- Page 78 and 79: Front south along the Continental D
- Page 80 and 81: Clinton to DrummondSpeciesGeographi
- Page 82 and 83: There has been a settlement with At
- Page 84 and 85:
Mountain Goats: The highest density
- Page 86 and 87:
suspected in very low levels, even
- Page 88:
dispersal corridor for all of these
- Page 91 and 92:
the area. Hunting access in general
- Page 93 and 94:
with the Elkhorns.Wolverines are kn
- Page 96 and 97:
FleecerSpeciesGeographic BoundaryFl
- Page 98 and 99:
negotiated grazing agreements on th
- Page 100 and 101:
traffic volumes are increasing sign
- Page 102 and 103:
pack in the linkage. The large size
- Page 104 and 105:
Garnets to BouldersSpeciesGeographi
- Page 106 and 107:
105
- Page 108 and 109:
persistent spring snow and may be k
- Page 110 and 111:
Garnets. The Clark Fork River Corri
- Page 112 and 113:
Horseshoe HillsSpeciesGeographic Bo
- Page 114 and 115:
Hound CreekSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 116 and 117:
Jefferson SloughSpeciesGeographic B
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
Willow packs moved here from the po
- Page 122:
the high potential for conflict wit
- Page 125 and 126:
the Castle Mountains south of Whets
- Page 127 and 128:
Lolo to TurahSpeciesGeographic Boun
- Page 129 and 130:
path; this could further fragment w
- Page 131 and 132:
Lost TrailSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 133 and 134:
MacDonald Pass toFleecer/Mt. Haggin
- Page 135 and 136:
claims within the area and 75 are b
- Page 137 and 138:
Conservation ThreatsDevelopment cou
- Page 139 and 140:
MaxvilleSpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 141 and 142:
Norris HillSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 143 and 144:
PipestoneSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 145 and 146:
144
- Page 147 and 148:
persistent snow pack.Lynx: Boles Cr
- Page 149 and 150:
Potter BasinSpeciesGeographic Bound
- Page 151 and 152:
150
- Page 153 and 154:
Mountain goats exist in small pocke
- Page 155 and 156:
Rocky Mountain Front to Big BeltMou
- Page 157 and 158:
Disease between bighorn sheep and d
- Page 159 and 160:
the linkage, grizzly bear forage in
- Page 161 and 162:
influencing how wildlife connectivi
- Page 163 and 164:
Several bighorn sheep herds form am
- Page 165 and 166:
Silver StarSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 167 and 168:
166
- Page 169 and 170:
controlled. In recent years, approx
- Page 171 and 172:
esulting from livestock depredation
- Page 173 and 174:
StickneySpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 175 and 176:
SulaSpeciesGeographic BoundaryThe S
- Page 177 and 178:
Tom Miner to Mill CreekSpeciesGeogr
- Page 179 and 180:
178
- Page 181 and 182:
development. Subdivision, fencing a
- Page 183 and 184:
Townsend from 1000 to 300 animals.
- Page 185 and 186:
These appear to be important for gr
- Page 187 and 188:
186
- Page 189 and 190:
Other existing packs include the Wo
- Page 191 and 192:
Creek and the Boulder River south o
- Page 193 and 194:
192
- Page 195 and 196:
Harestad A.S., and F.L. Bunnell. 19
- Page 197 and 198:
Trakhtenbrot, A. R. Nathan, G. Perr
- Page 199 and 200:
Appendix 1 (cont.).Table 1Mammals o
- Page 201 and 202:
Appendix 2 (cont.).Table 2Home Rang
- Page 203 and 204:
Appendix 3 (cont.).Table 3Migration
- Page 205 and 206:
Appendix 4 (cont.).Table 4Dispersal
- Page 207 and 208:
Appendix 5 (cont.).Studies Demonstr
- Page 209:
American Wildlands ~ Winter 2008