Montana Fish, <strong>Wildlife</strong> and Parks, <strong>The</strong> MontanaChallenge, http://fwp.mt.gov/tmc/default.htmlMontana’s Official Website. Montana FieldGuides. Retrieved June 19, 2008 from theWorldwide Web: http://fieldguide.mt.govNeckel-Oliveira, S. and C. Gascon. 2006.Abundance, body size and movement patternsof a tropical treefrog in continuous andfragmented forests in the Brazilian Amazon.Biological <strong>Conservation</strong> 128: 308-315.Pardini, R., S.Marques de Souza, R. Braga-Neto and J.P. Metzger. 2005. <strong>The</strong> role offorest structure, fragment size and corridorsin maintaining small mammal abundanceand diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape.Biological <strong>Conservation</strong> 124: 253-266.Perrow, M.R. and A.J. Davy. 2002. Handbook ofEcological Restoration. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Pimm, S., P. Raven, A. Peterson, C.H.Sekercioglu, and P.R. Ehrlich. 2006. Humanimpacts on the rates of recent, present, andfuture bird extinctions. PNAS 103(29): 10941-10946.Reh, W. and A. Seitz. 1990. <strong>The</strong> influence ofland use on the genetic structure of populationsof the common frog Rana temporaria. Biological<strong>Conservation</strong> 54: 239-249.Ruefenacht, B. and R.L. Knight. 1995. Influencesof corridor continuity and width on survival andmovement of deermice Peromyscus maniculatus.Biological <strong>Conservation</strong> 71: 269-274.Sanderson, W.W., M. Jaiteh, M.A. Levy, K.H.Redford, A.W. Wanebo and G. Woolmer. 2002.<strong>The</strong> human footprint and the last of the wild.BioScience 52: 891-904.Saunders, D.A., R.J. Hobbs and C.R. Margules.1991. Biological Consequences of EcosystemFragmentation: A Review. <strong>Conservation</strong> Biology5(1): 18-32.Sawyer, H. F. Lindzey and D. McWhirter. 2005.Mule deer and pronghorn migration in westernWyoming. <strong>Wildlife</strong> Society Bulletin 33(4): 1266-1273.Schmidt, N.M. and P.M. Jensen. 2003. Changesin mammalian body length over 175 years- adaptations to a fragmented landscape?<strong>Conservation</strong> Ecology 7(2): 6.Schmidt, N.M. and P.M. Jensen. 2005.Concomitant patterns in avian and mammalianbody length changes in Denmark. Ecology andSociety 10(2): 5.Semlitsch, R.D. 2007. Differentiating Migrationand Dispersal Processes for Pond-BreedingAmphibians. Journal of <strong>Wildlife</strong> Management72(1): 260-267.Servheen, Chris, John S. Waller, andPer Sandstrom. 2001. Identification andManagement of Linkage Zones for Grizzly BearsBetween the Large Blocks of Public Land in theNorthern Rocky Mountains, ICOET Proceedings,http://www.icoet.net/downloads/Process.pdf.Simberloff, D. and J. Cox. 1987. Consequencesand Costs of <strong>Conservation</strong> Corridors.<strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 1(1): 63-71.Simberloff, D., J.A. Farr, J. Cox, and D.W.Mehlman. 1992. Movement Corridors:conservation Bargains or Poor Investments?<strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 6(4): 493-504.Sutherland, G.D., A.S. Harestad, K. Price, K.P.Lertzman. 2000. Scaling of Natal DispersalDistances in Terrestrial Birds and Mammals.<strong>Conservation</strong> Ecology 4(1): 16 (online).Taylor, P.D., L.Fahrig, K. Henein, and G.Merriam. 1993. Connectivity is a vital elementof landscape structure. Oikos 68(3): 571-573.Thomas, T.R. and L.R. Irby. 1991. Winter habitatuse by mule deer with access to wheat fieldsand planted forb-grassland. <strong>Wildlife</strong> SocietyBulletin 19: 155-162.Tischendorf, L. and L. Fahrig. 2000. How shouldwe measure landscape connectivity? LandscapeEcology 15:633-641.195
Trakhtenbrot, A. R. Nathan, G. Perry and D.M.Richardson. 2005. <strong>The</strong> importance of longdistancedispersal in biodiversity conservation.Diversity and Distributions 11: 173-181.Trzcinski, M.K., L. Fahrig, and G. Merriam.1999. Independent effects of forest cover andfragmentation on the distribution of forestbreeding birds. Ecological Applications 9(2):586-593.USDA Forest Service, Northern Rockies LynxManagement Direction, Figure 1-1 NorthernRockies Lynx Planning <strong>Area</strong> Occupied andUnoccupied Lynx Habitat, Missoula, MT. March2007.US Fish and <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service. 1993. Grizzly bearrecovery plan. Missoula, MT. 181 pp.Vellend, M., K. Verheyen, H. Jacquemyn, A.Kolb, H.V. Calster, G. Peterken and M. Hermy.2006. Extinction debt of forest plants persistsfor more than a century following habitatfragmentation. Ecology 87(3): 542-548.pronghorn. Biological <strong>Conservation</strong> 135: 502-510.Wilson, E.O. and E.O. Willis. 1975. Appliedbiogeography. Pages 523-534 in M.L. Cody andJ.M. Diamond, editors. Ecology and evolutionof communities. Harvard University Press,Cambridge, Massachusetts.With, K.A., and T.O. Crist. 1995. CriticalThresholds in species’ responses to landscapestructure. Ecology 76(8): 246-2459.Wittmer, H.U., B.N. McLellan, D.R. Seip, J.A.Young, T.A. Kinley, G.S. Watts and D. Hamilton.2005. Population dynamics of the endangeredmountain ecotype of woodland caribou(Rangifer tarandus caribou) in British Columbia,Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 407-418.Wolff, J.O., E.M. Schauber and W. D. Edge.1997. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentationon the behavior and demography of gray-tailedvoles. <strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 11(4): 945-956.Waller, J.S. and C. Servheen. 2005. Effects oftransportation infrastructure on grizzly bearsin northwestern Montana. Journal of <strong>Wildlife</strong>Management 69(3): 985-1000.White, P.J., T.L. Davis, K.K. Barnowe-Meyer,R.L. Crabtree and R.A. Garrott. 2007. Partialmigration and philopatry of YellowstoneBug kill area between Silver Lake andAnaconda, photo by Grace Hammond196
- Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryMaintaining the ec
- Page 7 and 8:
Map 1. The Hub Conservation Area ma
- Page 9 and 10:
Map 3. Major elk linkages identifie
- Page 12 and 13:
Map 6. Major mule deer linkages ide
- Page 14 and 15:
Map 8. Major wolf linkages identifi
- Page 16 and 17:
Map 10. Major grizzly bear linkages
- Page 18 and 19:
For information regarding contents
- Page 20 and 21:
American Wildlands’ PriorityLinka
- Page 22 and 23:
Georgetown Lake,photo by Grace Hamm
- Page 24 and 25:
Beaverhead Mountains to the south,
- Page 26 and 27:
with mountainous wet meadows and ri
- Page 28 and 29:
irds). This step was repeated for c
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 4. Hierarchical breakdown of
- Page 32 and 33:
sanitation and conflict issues betw
- Page 34 and 35:
Literature ReviewThis review is mea
- Page 36 and 37:
that this impediment is deleterious
- Page 38 and 39:
may not provide functional connecti
- Page 40 and 41:
available during dispersal, and new
- Page 43 and 44:
and desert; this reflects overall a
- Page 45 and 46:
Photo by Denver Bryanpopulations. L
- Page 47 and 48:
Mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus)
- Page 49 and 50:
GUIDE TO READINGPRIORITY LINKAGE AS
- Page 51 and 52:
Absaroka to CraziesSpeciesGeographi
- Page 53 and 54:
BangtailsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 55 and 56:
Bear CreekSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 58 and 59:
Big BeltsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 60 and 61:
to disease transmission between dom
- Page 62:
sightings in the Birch Creek area.
- Page 65 and 66:
Elk move within this linkage for wi
- Page 67:
south of the linkage area.Wolverine
- Page 70 and 71:
ange for about 200 elk, and the Spr
- Page 72:
winter range is private land on the
- Page 75:
e using the Little Belt Mountains,
- Page 78 and 79:
Front south along the Continental D
- Page 80 and 81:
Clinton to DrummondSpeciesGeographi
- Page 82 and 83:
There has been a settlement with At
- Page 84 and 85:
Mountain Goats: The highest density
- Page 86 and 87:
suspected in very low levels, even
- Page 88:
dispersal corridor for all of these
- Page 91 and 92:
the area. Hunting access in general
- Page 93 and 94:
with the Elkhorns.Wolverines are kn
- Page 96 and 97:
FleecerSpeciesGeographic BoundaryFl
- Page 98 and 99:
negotiated grazing agreements on th
- Page 100 and 101:
traffic volumes are increasing sign
- Page 102 and 103:
pack in the linkage. The large size
- Page 104 and 105:
Garnets to BouldersSpeciesGeographi
- Page 106 and 107:
105
- Page 108 and 109:
persistent spring snow and may be k
- Page 110 and 111:
Garnets. The Clark Fork River Corri
- Page 112 and 113:
Horseshoe HillsSpeciesGeographic Bo
- Page 114 and 115:
Hound CreekSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 116 and 117:
Jefferson SloughSpeciesGeographic B
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
Willow packs moved here from the po
- Page 122:
the high potential for conflict wit
- Page 125 and 126:
the Castle Mountains south of Whets
- Page 127 and 128:
Lolo to TurahSpeciesGeographic Boun
- Page 129 and 130:
path; this could further fragment w
- Page 131 and 132:
Lost TrailSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 133 and 134:
MacDonald Pass toFleecer/Mt. Haggin
- Page 135 and 136:
claims within the area and 75 are b
- Page 137 and 138:
Conservation ThreatsDevelopment cou
- Page 139 and 140:
MaxvilleSpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 141 and 142:
Norris HillSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 143 and 144:
PipestoneSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 145 and 146: 144
- Page 147 and 148: persistent snow pack.Lynx: Boles Cr
- Page 149 and 150: Potter BasinSpeciesGeographic Bound
- Page 151 and 152: 150
- Page 153 and 154: Mountain goats exist in small pocke
- Page 155 and 156: Rocky Mountain Front to Big BeltMou
- Page 157 and 158: Disease between bighorn sheep and d
- Page 159 and 160: the linkage, grizzly bear forage in
- Page 161 and 162: influencing how wildlife connectivi
- Page 163 and 164: Several bighorn sheep herds form am
- Page 165 and 166: Silver StarSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 167 and 168: 166
- Page 169 and 170: controlled. In recent years, approx
- Page 171 and 172: esulting from livestock depredation
- Page 173 and 174: StickneySpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 175 and 176: SulaSpeciesGeographic BoundaryThe S
- Page 177 and 178: Tom Miner to Mill CreekSpeciesGeogr
- Page 179 and 180: 178
- Page 181 and 182: development. Subdivision, fencing a
- Page 183 and 184: Townsend from 1000 to 300 animals.
- Page 185 and 186: These appear to be important for gr
- Page 187 and 188: 186
- Page 189 and 190: Other existing packs include the Wo
- Page 191 and 192: Creek and the Boulder River south o
- Page 193 and 194: 192
- Page 195: Harestad A.S., and F.L. Bunnell. 19
- Page 199 and 200: Appendix 1 (cont.).Table 1Mammals o
- Page 201 and 202: Appendix 2 (cont.).Table 2Home Rang
- Page 203 and 204: Appendix 3 (cont.).Table 3Migration
- Page 205 and 206: Appendix 4 (cont.).Table 4Dispersal
- Page 207 and 208: Appendix 5 (cont.).Studies Demonstr
- Page 209: American Wildlands ~ Winter 2008