Literature CitedAlerstam, T., A. Hedenstrom and S. Akeson.2003. Long-distance migration: evolution anddeterminants. Oikos 103(2): 247-260.Apps, C.D. and B.N. McLellan. 2006. Factorsinfluencing the dispersion and fragmentationof endangered mountain caribou populations.Biological <strong>Conservation</strong> 130: 84-97.Baker, W. E. Larrions, C. Yocom and I. Baxter.1961. <strong>Wildlife</strong> of the Northern Rocky Mountains.Naturegraph Co., Healdsburg, CA.Baum, K.A., K.J. Haynes, F.P. Dillemuth, andJ.T. Cronin. 2004 <strong>The</strong> matrix enhances theeffectiveness of corridors and stepping stones.Ecology 85(10): 2671-2676.Beier, P. and R.F. Noss. 1998. Do HabitatCorridors Provide Connectivity? <strong>Conservation</strong>Biology 12(6):1241-1252.Belisle, M. 2005. Measuring landscapeconnectivity: the challenge of behaviorallandscape ecology. Ecology 86(8): 1988-1995.Belisle, M. and C.C. St. Clair. 2001. Cumulativeeffects of barriers on the movements of forestbirds. <strong>Conservation</strong> Ecology 5(2): 9.Berger, J. 2004. <strong>The</strong> Last Mile: How toSustain Long-Distance Migration in Mammals.<strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 18(2): 320-331.Bergerud, A.T., R. Ferguson and H.E. Butler.1990. Spring migration and dispersion ofwoodland caribou at calving. Animal Behavior39: 360-368.Boyce, M.S. 1991. Migratory behavior andmanagement of elk (Cervus elaphus). AppliedAnimal Behavior Science 29: 239-250.Brown, C.G. 1992. Movement and migrationpatterns of mule deer in southeastern Idaho.Journal of <strong>Wildlife</strong> Management 56(2): 246-253.Brown, J.H. and A. Kodric-Brown. 1977.Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect ofimmigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445-449.Caley, M.J., K.A. Buckley and G.P. Jones.2001. Separating ecological effects of habitatfragmentation degradation, and loss on coralcommensals. Ecology 82(12): 3435-3448.Coffman, C.J., J.D. Nichols and K.H. Pollock.2001. Population dynamics of Microtuspennsylvanicus in corridor-linked patches. Oikos93:3-21.Collins, R.J. and G.W. Barrett. 1997. Effectsof habitat fragmentation on meadow vole(Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamicsin experiment landscape patches. LandscapeEcology 12(2): 63-76.Crooks, K.R. and M.E. Soule. 1999.Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctionsin a fragmented system. Nature 400: 563-565.Dixon, J.D., M.K. Oli, M.C. Wooten, T.H.Eason, J.W. McCown, and D. Paetkau. 2006.Effectiveness of a Regional Corridor inConnecting two Florida Black Bear Populations.<strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 20(1): 155-162.Elias, S.A. 2002. Rocky Mountains. SmithsonianInstitution Press, Washington.Fahrig, Lenore. 2003. Effects of HabitatFragmentation Biodiversity. Annual Review ofEcological and Evolutionary Systems 34: 487-515.Fredrickson, R. and P. Hedrick. 2002. Bodysize in endangered Mexican wolves: effects ofinbreeding and cross-lineage matings. Animal<strong>Conservation</strong> 5: 39-43.Hale, M.L., P.W.W. Lurz, M.D.F. Shirley, S.Rushton, R.M. Fuller and K. Wolff. 2001. Impactof landscape management on the geneticstructure of red squirrel populations. Science293(5538).193
Harestad A.S., and F.L. Bunnell. 1979. Homerange and body weight - a reevaluation. Ecology60(2): 389-402.Headwaters Economics, Economic ProfileSystem, Bozeman, MT, http://www.headwaterseconomics.org/eps/index.phpHarris, G. and S.L. Pimm. 2008. Range Size andExtinction Risk in Forest Birds. <strong>Conservation</strong>Biology 22(1): 163-171.Hebblewhite, M., E.H. Merrill, L.E. Morgantini,C.A. White, J.R. Allen, E. Bruns, L. Thurston,and T. E. Hurd. 2006. Is the Migratory Behaviorof Montane Elk Herds in Peril? <strong>The</strong> Case ofAlberta’s Ya Ha Tinda Elk Herd. <strong>Wildlife</strong> SocietyBulletin 34(5): 1280-1294.Hilty, J.A. and A.M. Merenlender. 2004. Use ofRiparian Corridors and Vineyards by MammalianPredators in Northern California. <strong>Conservation</strong>Biology 18(1): 126-135.Hilty, J.A., W.Z. Lidicker and A.M. Merenlender.2006. Corridor Ecology: <strong>The</strong> Science andPractice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity<strong>Conservation</strong>. Island Press, WA.Hoehn, M., S.D. Sarre and K. Henle. 2007. <strong>The</strong>tales of two geckos: does dispersal preventextinction in recently fragmented populations?Molecular Ecology 16: 3299-3312.Hoffman, J.D., H.H. Genoways and J.R. Choate.2006. Long-distance dispersal and populationtrends of moose in the central United States.Alces 42: 115-131.IGBC Public Lands <strong>Wildlife</strong> Linkage Task Force,Identifying and Managing <strong>Wildlife</strong> LinkageApproach <strong>Area</strong>s on Public Land: A Report to theInteragency Grizzly Bear Committee, Missoula,MT, http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/wildlife/igbc/Linkage/Public%20Lands%20Linkage/Cover_and_TOC.pdf, June 17, 2004.James, A.R.C., and A.K. Stuart-Smith. 2000.Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation tolinear corridors. Journal of <strong>Wildlife</strong> Management64(1): 154-159.Keller, I. and C.R. Largiader. 2003. Recenthabitat fragmentation caused by majorroads leads to reduction of gene flow andloss of genetic variability in ground beetles.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 270:417-423.Kinley, T.A. and C.D. Apps. 2001. Mortalitypatterns in a subpopulation of endangeredmountain caribou. <strong>Wildlife</strong> Society Bulletin29(1): 158-164.Laliberte, A.S. and W.J. Ripple. 2004. RangeContractions of North American Carnivores andUngulates. Bioscience 54(2): 123-138.Lincoln, R., G. Boxshall and P. Clark. 1998.A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution andSystematics, 2nd ed. Cambridge UniversityPress, New York, NY.Lomolino, M.V. and D.R. Perault. 2007. BodySize Variation of Mammals in a FragmentedTemperate Rainforest. <strong>Conservation</strong> Biology21(4) 1059-1069.MacArthur, R.H. and E.O. Wilson. 1967. <strong>The</strong>theory of Island Biogeography. PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Mathews, D. 2003. Rocky Mountain NaturalHistory: Grand Teton to Jasper. Raven Editions,Portland, OR.McGarigal, K. and W.C. McComb. 1995.Relationships between landscape structureand breeding birds in the Oregon coast range.Ecological Monographs 65(3): 235-260.Mech, S.G. and J.G. Hallett. 2001. Evaluatingthe Effectiveness of Corridors: a GeneticApproach. <strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 15(2): 467-474.Merrill, E.H., T.P. Hemker, K.P. Woodruff, and L.Kuck. 1994. Impacts of mining facilities on fallmigration of mule deer. <strong>Wildlife</strong> Society Bulletin22(1): 68-73.Montana Fish, <strong>Wildlife</strong> and Parks, Grizzly BearManagement Plan for Western Montana, FinalEnvironmental Impact Statement, Bozeman, MT,December 2006.194
- Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryMaintaining the ec
- Page 7 and 8:
Map 1. The Hub Conservation Area ma
- Page 9 and 10:
Map 3. Major elk linkages identifie
- Page 12 and 13:
Map 6. Major mule deer linkages ide
- Page 14 and 15:
Map 8. Major wolf linkages identifi
- Page 16 and 17:
Map 10. Major grizzly bear linkages
- Page 18 and 19:
For information regarding contents
- Page 20 and 21:
American Wildlands’ PriorityLinka
- Page 22 and 23:
Georgetown Lake,photo by Grace Hamm
- Page 24 and 25:
Beaverhead Mountains to the south,
- Page 26 and 27:
with mountainous wet meadows and ri
- Page 28 and 29:
irds). This step was repeated for c
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 4. Hierarchical breakdown of
- Page 32 and 33:
sanitation and conflict issues betw
- Page 34 and 35:
Literature ReviewThis review is mea
- Page 36 and 37:
that this impediment is deleterious
- Page 38 and 39:
may not provide functional connecti
- Page 40 and 41:
available during dispersal, and new
- Page 43 and 44:
and desert; this reflects overall a
- Page 45 and 46:
Photo by Denver Bryanpopulations. L
- Page 47 and 48:
Mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus)
- Page 49 and 50:
GUIDE TO READINGPRIORITY LINKAGE AS
- Page 51 and 52:
Absaroka to CraziesSpeciesGeographi
- Page 53 and 54:
BangtailsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 55 and 56:
Bear CreekSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 58 and 59:
Big BeltsSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 60 and 61:
to disease transmission between dom
- Page 62:
sightings in the Birch Creek area.
- Page 65 and 66:
Elk move within this linkage for wi
- Page 67:
south of the linkage area.Wolverine
- Page 70 and 71:
ange for about 200 elk, and the Spr
- Page 72:
winter range is private land on the
- Page 75:
e using the Little Belt Mountains,
- Page 78 and 79:
Front south along the Continental D
- Page 80 and 81:
Clinton to DrummondSpeciesGeographi
- Page 82 and 83:
There has been a settlement with At
- Page 84 and 85:
Mountain Goats: The highest density
- Page 86 and 87:
suspected in very low levels, even
- Page 88:
dispersal corridor for all of these
- Page 91 and 92:
the area. Hunting access in general
- Page 93 and 94:
with the Elkhorns.Wolverines are kn
- Page 96 and 97:
FleecerSpeciesGeographic BoundaryFl
- Page 98 and 99:
negotiated grazing agreements on th
- Page 100 and 101:
traffic volumes are increasing sign
- Page 102 and 103:
pack in the linkage. The large size
- Page 104 and 105:
Garnets to BouldersSpeciesGeographi
- Page 106 and 107:
105
- Page 108 and 109:
persistent spring snow and may be k
- Page 110 and 111:
Garnets. The Clark Fork River Corri
- Page 112 and 113:
Horseshoe HillsSpeciesGeographic Bo
- Page 114 and 115:
Hound CreekSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 116 and 117:
Jefferson SloughSpeciesGeographic B
- Page 118 and 119:
117
- Page 120 and 121:
Willow packs moved here from the po
- Page 122:
the high potential for conflict wit
- Page 125 and 126:
the Castle Mountains south of Whets
- Page 127 and 128:
Lolo to TurahSpeciesGeographic Boun
- Page 129 and 130:
path; this could further fragment w
- Page 131 and 132:
Lost TrailSpeciesGeographic Boundar
- Page 133 and 134:
MacDonald Pass toFleecer/Mt. Haggin
- Page 135 and 136:
claims within the area and 75 are b
- Page 137 and 138:
Conservation ThreatsDevelopment cou
- Page 139 and 140:
MaxvilleSpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 141 and 142:
Norris HillSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 143 and 144: PipestoneSpeciesGeographic Boundary
- Page 145 and 146: 144
- Page 147 and 148: persistent snow pack.Lynx: Boles Cr
- Page 149 and 150: Potter BasinSpeciesGeographic Bound
- Page 151 and 152: 150
- Page 153 and 154: Mountain goats exist in small pocke
- Page 155 and 156: Rocky Mountain Front to Big BeltMou
- Page 157 and 158: Disease between bighorn sheep and d
- Page 159 and 160: the linkage, grizzly bear forage in
- Page 161 and 162: influencing how wildlife connectivi
- Page 163 and 164: Several bighorn sheep herds form am
- Page 165 and 166: Silver StarSpeciesGeographic Bounda
- Page 167 and 168: 166
- Page 169 and 170: controlled. In recent years, approx
- Page 171 and 172: esulting from livestock depredation
- Page 173 and 174: StickneySpeciesGeographic BoundaryT
- Page 175 and 176: SulaSpeciesGeographic BoundaryThe S
- Page 177 and 178: Tom Miner to Mill CreekSpeciesGeogr
- Page 179 and 180: 178
- Page 181 and 182: development. Subdivision, fencing a
- Page 183 and 184: Townsend from 1000 to 300 animals.
- Page 185 and 186: These appear to be important for gr
- Page 187 and 188: 186
- Page 189 and 190: Other existing packs include the Wo
- Page 191 and 192: Creek and the Boulder River south o
- Page 193: 192
- Page 197 and 198: Trakhtenbrot, A. R. Nathan, G. Perr
- Page 199 and 200: Appendix 1 (cont.).Table 1Mammals o
- Page 201 and 202: Appendix 2 (cont.).Table 2Home Rang
- Page 203 and 204: Appendix 3 (cont.).Table 3Migration
- Page 205 and 206: Appendix 4 (cont.).Table 4Dispersal
- Page 207 and 208: Appendix 5 (cont.).Studies Demonstr
- Page 209: American Wildlands ~ Winter 2008