central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Copies of the survey sketch and the satellite imageries given in the Lokayukta, Karnataka Report are collectively enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-61 to this Report. 5. As a follow up action on the Lokayukta, Karnataka Report, the Karnataka Forest Department registered a forest offence case No.134/2008-09 dated 4.2.2009 against the lessee. However M/s Lakshminarayana Mining Company filed a Writ Petition No.4072 of 2009 before the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court against the said forest offence registered by the Forest Department. The Writ Petition was disposed of by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court by judgment dated 24 th April, 2009 (copy enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-61 to this Report). The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced below: “(i) Lokayukta report and the sketches attached thereto can be the basis for the respondents to prosecute the FIR dated 4.2.2009 and the Seizure order dated 5.2.2009; (ii) the prayer to quash the First Information Report dated 4.2.2009 is rejected, giving liberty to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law, subject to the orders hereunder; 84
(iii) Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary Division, Bellary – fourth Respondent, shall inspect and survey the impugned area leased out to the petitioner, in the presence of the petitioner, the Controller of Mines, Indian Bureau of Mines, Bangalore, along with the nominee not below the rank of the Deputy Director by the Director General, Survey of India, and take appropriate decision as to the alleged encroachment by the petitioner with reference to the survey records and other relevant material available and documents produced in this regard. If any encroachment of forest land is found, the respondents are at liberty to assess the damages caused on account of such illegal mining outside the leased out mining area and recover the same from the petitioner; (iv) The respondents are directed to return the tools, vehicles and machinery to the petitioner on the condition that the same shall be produced before the respondents/jurisdictional Magistrate as and when required by law, subject to the finding in the inspection to be conducted by the fourth 85 respondent in the presence of the petitioner and
Page 1 and 2:
CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
Page 3 and 4:
15.3.2003 and other related notific
Page 5 and 6:
een filed by the CEC (Report (Inter
Page 7 and 8:
Karnataka comes to Rs.15,245 crores
Page 9 and 10:
8. Subsequently when the inspecting
Page 11 and 12:
zone and afforestation are provided
Page 13 and 14:
een taken to verify the details of
Page 15 and 16:
forest land. In Bellary District, t
Page 17 and 18:
officers of the State of Karnataka
Page 19 and 20:
with the active connivance of the o
Page 21 and 22:
sensitive positions are also simult
Page 23 and 24:
CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
Page 25 and 26:
merger Agreement inter alia conferr
Page 27 and 28:
the details of the areas notified u
Page 29 and 30:
8. Large tracts of areas in Karnata
Page 31 and 32:
10. From the above it may be seen t
Page 33 and 34: 5. 2646 M/s Shiva Vilas Trust 6. Sh
Page 35 and 36: non-forest land. Falls in de-reserv
Page 37 and 38: the Divisional Forest Officer. A st
Page 39 and 40: have been provided by the Karnataka
Page 41 and 42: favour of M/s Shiva Vilas Trust, wh
Page 43 and 44: Hon’ble Karnataka High Court are
Page 45 and 46: sanctioned lease area, the Lokayukt
Page 47 and 48: notification issued under Section 4
Page 49 and 50: directed to be undertaken in a time
Page 51 and 52: y them because of mining leases ill
Page 53 and 54: However, the formal approval under
Page 55 and 56: 16.3.2011 (enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-4
Page 57 and 58: 7. There have been consistent compl
Page 59 and 60: demarcated the mining lease of M/s.
Page 61 and 62: satellite imageries. During the sit
Page 63 and 64: y the S.B. Minerals, as seen in the
Page 65 and 66: considered view that the joint surv
Page 67 and 68: 67 man’s land available for illeg
Page 69 and 70: 69 Lokayukta, Karnataka, report of
Page 71 and 72: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
Page 73 and 74: prosecute the FIR dated 3.2.2009 an
Page 75 and 76: 3. Similar directions have been pas
Page 77 and 78: 6. The findings of the Lokayukta, K
Page 79 and 80: illegality in respect of mining lea
Page 81 and 82: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
Page 83: hectares of already broken up fores
Page 87 and 88: the leased out area which is not di
Page 89 and 90: compliance of the directions of the
Page 91 and 92: Report. A copy of the note of the P
Page 93 and 94: viii) the case involved wilful viol
Page 95 and 96: the Conservator of Forest, Bellary
Page 97 and 98: egard to the iron ore seized by the
show all

central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?