26.11.2012 Views

central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

satellite imageries. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> site visit, <strong>the</strong> pillars perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> common boundary l<strong>in</strong>es and <strong>the</strong> enjoyment l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />

found to exist on <strong>the</strong> ground. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Survey by <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Lokayukta Team, <strong>the</strong> enjoyment l<strong>in</strong>e (show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> area<br />

where<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was undertaken by <strong>the</strong> leaseholders) <strong>of</strong> M/s.<br />

Muneer Enterprises was found to be about 30-40 meters<br />

North <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sanctioned boundary l<strong>in</strong>e and which was found<br />

to merge with <strong>the</strong> boundary l<strong>in</strong>e near <strong>the</strong> western portion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease. The area between <strong>the</strong>se two l<strong>in</strong>es was <strong>the</strong><br />

area under illegal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and encroachment. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> site<br />

visit by <strong>the</strong> CEC, massive m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was found to have taken<br />

place much beyond <strong>the</strong> enjoyment l<strong>in</strong>e found by <strong>the</strong><br />

Lokayukta Team dur<strong>in</strong>g 2006-07. Even if <strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong><br />

Karnataka had any doubt about <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease boundaries<br />

and area under encroachment determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Lokayukta,<br />

no fresh m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g should have been allowed by <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Deptt. and Forest Deptt. at least beyond <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

enjoynment found to exist at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> survey by <strong>the</strong><br />

Lokayukta Team. It is totally beyond comprehension how <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was allowed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area even beyond <strong>the</strong> enjoyment<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

12. The Satellite Imageries <strong>of</strong> this area vividly br<strong>in</strong>gs out<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> massive illegal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that has taken place <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> area. The Satellite Imagery <strong>of</strong> 2003 shows a small area<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!