central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition

26.11.2012 Views

would not be entitled to operate the mine without first getting the ex-post-facto approval from the MoEF under the FC Act. 4. On a representation made by M/s RMML the Conservator of Forests, Bellary Circle, vide letter dated 7.10.2009, directed the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary District to submit the compliance report in respect of the above said “in principle approval” granted in favour of the leaseholder(enclosed at ANNEXURE–R-37 to this Report). Subsequently, the Conservator of Forests, Bellary Circle vide letter dated 1.4.2010(enclosed at ANNEXURE– R-38 to this Report) withdrew the above mentioned letter dated 7.10.2009 on the purported ground that no directions in connection with the Court orders had been received by him either from the Govt. or higher authorities. The Deputy Conservator of Forests, Bellary Circle did not send the compliance report regarding the conditions stated inin principle approval” granted by the MoEF and in the absence of the compliance Report from the State of Karnataka, the MoEF did not issue the formal approval under the FC Act. It was much later that the MoEF vide letters dated 9.9.2010 and 15.9.2010 (enclosed at ANNEXURE–R-39 to this Report) granted the formal approval under the FC Act for the diversion of 335.04 ha. of forest land for the ML No.2010. The Government of Karnataka vide recent letter dated 54

16.3.2011 (enclosed at ANNEXURE–R-40 to this Report) has requested the MoEF to cancel the formal approval as this approval has been granted without receipt of the compliance report from the State Government. 5. There are a number of mining leases which have a common boundary with the ML No.2010 of M/s. RMML (all are in forest land). These include mining leases of M/s. S.B. Minerals (M.L.No. 2550), M/s. Balaji Mines and Minerals (M.L.No. 2564), M/s. Trident Minerals (M.L.No. 2315), M/s. Veeyam Pvt. Ltd. (M.L.No. 988) and M/s. Muneer Enterprises (M.L.No. 2320). The Lokayukta of Karnataka in 2006-07 carried out a survey of these mining leases and determined the boundaries of the mining leases based on the approved lease sketches as well as the actual area under enjoyment. The GPS readings of the corners of the boundaries of the mining lease as per the sanctioned lease sketch and the enjoyment lines as existing at that time were recorded and these boundaries were demarcated on the ground and also on the Satellite Imageries. The area between the boundary of the mining lease as per the approved lease sketch and the enjoyment line as observed on the ground represented the area wherein illegal mining and encroachment in the forest area had taken place. During the site visit of the CEC the pillars along the common 55

16.3.2011 (enclosed at ANNEXURE–R-40 to this Report)<br />

has requested <strong>the</strong> MoEF to cancel <strong>the</strong> formal approval as<br />

this approval has been granted without receipt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

compliance <strong>report</strong> from <strong>the</strong> State Government.<br />

5. There are a number <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leases which have a<br />

common boundary with <strong>the</strong> ML No.2010 <strong>of</strong> M/s. RMML (all<br />

are <strong>in</strong> forest land). These <strong>in</strong>clude m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leases <strong>of</strong> M/s. S.B.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>erals (M.L.No. 2550), M/s. Balaji M<strong>in</strong>es and M<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

(M.L.No. 2564), M/s. Trident M<strong>in</strong>erals (M.L.No. 2315), M/s.<br />

Veeyam Pvt. Ltd. (M.L.No. 988) and M/s. Muneer<br />

Enterprises (M.L.No. 2320). The Lokayukta <strong>of</strong> Karnataka <strong>in</strong><br />

2006-07 carried out a survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leases and<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leases based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> approved lease sketches as well as <strong>the</strong> actual area<br />

under enjoyment. The GPS read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> corners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease as per <strong>the</strong> sanctioned lease<br />

sketch and <strong>the</strong> enjoyment l<strong>in</strong>es as exist<strong>in</strong>g at that time were<br />

recorded and <strong>the</strong>se boundaries were demarcated on <strong>the</strong><br />

ground and also on <strong>the</strong> Satellite Imageries. The area<br />

between <strong>the</strong> boundary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease as per <strong>the</strong><br />

approved lease sketch and <strong>the</strong> enjoyment l<strong>in</strong>e as observed<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ground represented <strong>the</strong> area where<strong>in</strong> illegal m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

and encroachment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest area had taken place. Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> site visit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CEC <strong>the</strong> pillars along <strong>the</strong> common<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!