central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition
central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition central empowered committee report (i) of the cec in writ petition
een removed from the mining lease area and for which no permission was obtained; (c) The mining lease of Shri J.M. Vrushabhendraiah (JMV) has been sanctioned on 14.12.2007 for 8.81 acres even though this area was part of the area notified on 15.3.2003 in Block No. 13/1 and for which applications from public were invited for grant of mining leases. Similar is the case with the mining lease of J.M.V. involving 3.36 hectares. The Lokayukta, Karnataka has found that as against 3.36 hectares of mining lease area, the boundary fixed by the lessee was over 15.86 hectares, 5.94 hectares was under mining pit outside the lease area and 8.37 hectares outside the lease area has been used for over- burden dumps. The Joint Survey Report dated 29.3.2009 has confirmed encroachment on 14.35 hectares; (d) In respect of Adarsha Enterprises, the mining lease has been granted on 18.7.2002 as sole applicant even though the area was part of the block No.13/1 notified for inviting applications 44 from public. As against 2.91 hectares of
sanctioned lease area, the Lokayukta, Karnataka found that the boundary fixed by the lessee covers 7.73 hectares, 1.36 hectares has been used for mining pit outside the lease area, 0.76 hectares has been used for over-burden dumps outside while 2.98 hectares outside the lease area has been used for other encroachments. A copy of the sketch prepared by the Lokayukta, Karnataka showing the details of the encroachments in the adjoining forest area by the lessee is enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-33 to this Report; (e) The mining lease in favour of Shri D. Ramesh was initially processed by treating the applied land as non-forest land. The area was part of the block 13/1 notified on 15.3.2003 for inviting applications from public for grant of mining lease. Subsequently, vide notification dated 27.3.2008, 99.10 hectares of land was deleted from the said notification on the purported ground that these were patta lands (including the mining lease area of Shri D. Ramesh). The Government of Karnataka vide notification dated 19.3.2011 45 withdrew the earlier notification dated 27.3.2008
- Page 1 and 2: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
- Page 3 and 4: 15.3.2003 and other related notific
- Page 5 and 6: een filed by the CEC (Report (Inter
- Page 7 and 8: Karnataka comes to Rs.15,245 crores
- Page 9 and 10: 8. Subsequently when the inspecting
- Page 11 and 12: zone and afforestation are provided
- Page 13 and 14: een taken to verify the details of
- Page 15 and 16: forest land. In Bellary District, t
- Page 17 and 18: officers of the State of Karnataka
- Page 19 and 20: with the active connivance of the o
- Page 21 and 22: sensitive positions are also simult
- Page 23 and 24: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
- Page 25 and 26: merger Agreement inter alia conferr
- Page 27 and 28: the details of the areas notified u
- Page 29 and 30: 8. Large tracts of areas in Karnata
- Page 31 and 32: 10. From the above it may be seen t
- Page 33 and 34: 5. 2646 M/s Shiva Vilas Trust 6. Sh
- Page 35 and 36: non-forest land. Falls in de-reserv
- Page 37 and 38: the Divisional Forest Officer. A st
- Page 39 and 40: have been provided by the Karnataka
- Page 41 and 42: favour of M/s Shiva Vilas Trust, wh
- Page 43: Hon’ble Karnataka High Court are
- Page 47 and 48: notification issued under Section 4
- Page 49 and 50: directed to be undertaken in a time
- Page 51 and 52: y them because of mining leases ill
- Page 53 and 54: However, the formal approval under
- Page 55 and 56: 16.3.2011 (enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-4
- Page 57 and 58: 7. There have been consistent compl
- Page 59 and 60: demarcated the mining lease of M/s.
- Page 61 and 62: satellite imageries. During the sit
- Page 63 and 64: y the S.B. Minerals, as seen in the
- Page 65 and 66: considered view that the joint surv
- Page 67 and 68: 67 man’s land available for illeg
- Page 69 and 70: 69 Lokayukta, Karnataka, report of
- Page 71 and 72: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
- Page 73 and 74: prosecute the FIR dated 3.2.2009 an
- Page 75 and 76: 3. Similar directions have been pas
- Page 77 and 78: 6. The findings of the Lokayukta, K
- Page 79 and 80: illegality in respect of mining lea
- Page 81 and 82: CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE REPORT
- Page 83 and 84: hectares of already broken up fores
- Page 85 and 86: (iii) Deputy Conservator of Forests
- Page 87 and 88: the leased out area which is not di
- Page 89 and 90: compliance of the directions of the
- Page 91 and 92: Report. A copy of the note of the P
- Page 93 and 94: viii) the case involved wilful viol
sanctioned lease area, <strong>the</strong> Lokayukta, Karnataka<br />
found that <strong>the</strong> boundary fixed by <strong>the</strong> lessee<br />
covers 7.73 hectares, 1.36 hectares has been<br />
used for m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pit outside <strong>the</strong> lease area, 0.76<br />
hectares has been used for over-burden dumps<br />
outside while 2.98 hectares outside <strong>the</strong> lease<br />
area has been used for o<strong>the</strong>r encroachments. A<br />
copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sketch prepared by <strong>the</strong> Lokayukta,<br />
Karnataka show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
encroachments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forest area by<br />
<strong>the</strong> lessee is enclosed at ANNEXURE-R-33 to<br />
this Report;<br />
(e) The m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> Shri D. Ramesh<br />
was <strong>in</strong>itially processed by treat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> applied<br />
land as non-forest land. The area was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
block 13/1 notified on 15.3.2003 for <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
applications from public for grant <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease.<br />
Subsequently, vide notification dated 27.3.2008,<br />
99.10 hectares <strong>of</strong> land was deleted from <strong>the</strong> said<br />
notification on <strong>the</strong> purported ground that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
were patta lands (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g lease area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Shri D. Ramesh). The Government <strong>of</strong><br />
Karnataka vide notification dated 19.3.2011<br />
45<br />
withdrew <strong>the</strong> earlier notification dated 27.3.2008
Change language