View PDF - Digital Collections

m'ver1UJu le 11.rnf.' ;,Aormaa;Aida, Ad%mo;ere they introduced in4thiv-Az ;„,)ftSe.• J. , 1*,r, 41„,,4:4;••,-an'A.Inlift41.Acignt in 13'6,vcii '.10e of the PArtiell !,Amte deaatottI un ,%ervtand Coxhrotr! ,were nbnr i1et of the IndiAn 'Territory,e e them cempetnt evidence in thesewom nQt Lfl 1JJ6 tr, Yt wi1 videncebeen able to find them,11 Jr. rGoe .; . .„ff,1,t the aust:ylian, of Affidavits?Nomrull I omie. letter f••o .m .aenciiti on about ti .tt„juip Adlms Were the parties in this suit parties to the nreceedirqin whia these refidavits were filed?Noitrlin; No,Jwi.The nf.trtioo in the preent a9130 wore not rmrtiorc to thenro.ceediaz, when these afftdavits rere taken?• No rum ;A -1:ulc;It j5 true thA the rtt of June 10 4 1896, iithoriZor, thenrior toDtwe r. on to consider la I affidavits taken -!Ti5 thattire, where the ritnease were dead or beyond the limits ofthe Territory, but you prepose to show the contents ofis:avits used in anoter nroceedtn77?Mt, Nelmril Yet,Bir, tht were used in,..rvothea eed_nE„fr • MAnIfieli:These affidaiits •an only be mr00 competent in thisCourt, by havine: been trlade competent before the DIWOS Cori..