View PDF - Digital Collections
View PDF - Digital Collections View PDF - Digital Collections
1.In the Choctaw and Chickasaw Ci ti zenship Court,sitting at Tishornin7o, I.T. May 2, 1904.--o--Newt, Askew, et al, No,andVim, Quint Askew, et,al, No. 2,16.6140,WV7 4...MThe Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations,Present and presiling the Hons. Spencer B. Adams, Chief J .,cite,Walter L. Weaver and Henry 5, Foote, Associate J"' iges.ApDe -ag, L-moos ,Thos. Norman, for Plaintiffs,lansfield, Mcilurray & Cornish, for Defendants,--o—MAY 20, 1904, This day this caure corning on further to behen,r1., the following proceedilags were hal to-wit;Mr. Norman;In this case we have a motion to take evidence in Alabama,Lauder hale owty, This motion was filed April 20; mayI read the motion?Judge Aiarrn; Yes, sir.(Mr. Noriou, mails motion)(Twist 'A laLis ; Has a copy been served on the other side?Mr. Norman;Yes, sir.Ju lge AdaLls ;hat time did your peoTlle or ancestors remove to this
country. ?NorTann; I think sometime in the ei Ati e; I am not able to stateju*3e. Alga?!poitively, but it wasbefore 830, pprmibly about '07,,Have you aily eviiece you lesire to offer today.1;1,,ir„ Norman;;C deie to take what wehave twiny rind then takej111#?7,e Adams;Co rldother, -but before we -.::..)roceed to .ht, pertait me to !rakea motion, in .case No* 2, William Quint Askew.Nonnan reads .rration to consolidate case NOP,Are the faot aet oL..4t, in, the refii.avit conceded by tDefendants?I understand th.4,t to be true; ,vid 1. any Fifty ti:rm,,t I t..:ink itklflo true of the h11%1„ Bennett Case, tried at Zouth,zter rind vfiich trn.nsferred to this iiiakm.t, DDcket„Adflms;:iinto in attorney in h Ell1. ziennet Ca o ?Cornish.;Charbe s; I also unierstrart tht this fct 11 trueof oae 68 and 39, on this Docket.Normaii;I think there loco -1110 are also relate1 to the Askews, butI do not represent •them,• CO sh;Still where the lerr!.o are rela• sz)ri7 from theSaf'Zie Source , the court has alontel the nrrictice of h.avingthe testi ony in one case v -ply lh anotLer„Ju't7 Adams;will wake t} .:e .icr onno1i iatin the Fl etwo cases, butto would not cleire to .c. ...iselidate 0f3eS in the absence ofCounsel, 'but you can file such a motion if you no (.1.017iro,•This motion sets forth that this min desires thene .two cases,0
- Page 1: ., • '- • . ,(k“L..±'V APe!Z
- Page 5 and 6: Asker.Q. - -hat w-ks.1 her lialce b
- Page 7 and 8: A.- Yes, sir.Q.- How did he in-Ts?A
- Page 9 and 10: m'ver1UJu le 11.rnf.' ;,Aormaa;Aida
- Page 11 and 12: tl.en prior to juo:c the Act of j'a
- Page 13 and 14: onA.- Yen, dr, 1 thiiik hc 77'$,,la
- Page 15 and 16: to the Territóry, ni f ,..t.„„
- Page 17 and 18: A Yes, sir.Her ienceniants now live
- Page 19 and 20: None of them moved to the Choctq,r
- Page 21 and 22: '7771,7! ',..!,W7,77"•-:-117..f..
- Page 23 and 24: himA. - Yes,^.- 1, 1-1i,t Tribe?A.-
- Page 25 and 26: A.- Yes, sir,Q.- ti.t ild he state
- Page 27 and 28: A.- He never st!),terl.Q.- Hai he h
- Page 29 and 30: Mr. Norman;Tom Askew,a witness intr
- Page 31 and 32: ▪A.- My mother.i r your mother li
- Page 33 and 34: Bell Hendri x,ri tnes s cal e 1, by
- Page 35 and 36: A.-How old w-,s your father when he
- Page 37 and 38: •• ..itnops claled by the Plain
- Page 39 and 40: Q. - Lauderdale(Jounty?A.- Yes,Know
- Page 41 and 42: Q lie is deal.A. , rj.• t'dth the
- Page 43 and 44: A.- About 1070.Aril. she was about
- Page 45 and 46: fyl, the end of the thirteen years,
- Page 47 and 48: Q.- You exercised the rits and priv
- Page 49 and 50: A.- No, sir.Q Is Pihe living or ,A.
- Page 51 and 52: They roull -nut it at un 4,', • '
country. ?NorTann; I think sometime in the ei Ati e; I am not able to stateju*3e. Alga?!poitively, but it wasbefore 830, pprmibly about '07,,Have you aily eviiece you lesire to offer today.1;1,,ir„ Norman;;C deie to take what wehave twiny rind then takej111#?7,e Adams;Co rldother, -but before we -.::..)roceed to .ht, pertait me to !rakea motion, in .case No* 2, William Quint Askew.Nonnan reads .rration to consolidate case NOP,Are the faot aet oL..4t, in, the refii.avit conceded by tDefendants?I understand th.4,t to be true; ,vid 1. any Fifty ti:rm,,t I t..:ink itklflo true of the h11%1„ Bennett Case, tried at Zouth,zter rind vfiich trn.nsferred to this iiiakm.t, DDcket„Adflms;:iinto in attorney in h Ell1. ziennet Ca o ?Cornish.;Charbe s; I also unierstrart tht this fct 11 trueof oae 68 and 39, on this Docket.Normaii;I think there loco -1110 are also relate1 to the Askews, butI do not represent •them,• CO sh;Still where the lerr!.o are rela• sz)ri7 from theSaf'Zie Source , the court has alontel the nrrictice of h.avingthe testi ony in one case v -ply lh anotLer„Ju't7 Adams;will wake t} .:e .icr onno1i iatin the Fl etwo cases, butto would not cleire to .c. ...iselidate 0f3eS in the absence ofCounsel, 'but you can file such a motion if you no (.1.017iro,•This motion sets forth that this min desires thene .two cases,0
Change language