11.07.2015 Views

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Women</strong> <strong>offenders</strong>: <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 71184. The Secretary of State told us that he intends <strong>the</strong> commissioning reforms to betteralign rehabilitative services in custody with those in <strong>the</strong> community, as proposed in ourprobation report. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> Government plans to reconfigure <strong>the</strong> custodial estateto designate specific prisons as “resettlement hubs” with closer links to particulargeographical areas may also prove more difficult in <strong>the</strong> female prison estate as <strong>the</strong> problemof distance from home communities is more acute than for men. HM Chief Inspector ofPrisons was unsure how this could be resolved without radically changing where womenare held. 384185. The cost of women’s prisons is disproportionately high. 385 <strong>Women</strong>’s prisons are moreexpensive to run, and each intervention, including mental health and drug treatment, andtraining, is more costly to deliver than in male prisons. The current benchmarking reviewmay <strong>the</strong>refore impact disproportionately on <strong>the</strong> female prison estate. Rachel Halford of<strong>Women</strong> in Prison attributed some improvements in <strong>the</strong> treatment of women in custody toincreases in levels of staff in women’s establishments, but feared that this could deterioratein <strong>the</strong> face of staffing reductions. 386Small custodial units186. Baroness <strong>Corston</strong> disputed <strong>the</strong> previous Government’s primary reason for notaccepting <strong>the</strong> need for small custodial units which <strong>the</strong>y argued was “because women<strong>the</strong>mselves did not want <strong>the</strong>m”. While on <strong>the</strong> face of it, she could accept this, for example,as in prison environments women’s disputes tend to result in bullying, she believed thatthis could be overcome with appropriately enforced respect policies. 387 She was alsosceptical about arguments that <strong>the</strong>ir costs would make <strong>the</strong>m unfeasible: “[...] <strong>the</strong> cost ofrunning <strong>the</strong>se 13 women’s prisons is astronomical. I think that, probably, <strong>the</strong> cost overallof having small custodial units may well be <strong>the</strong> same, but <strong>the</strong> cost in terms of disruption tohuman lives and to society is incalculable [...] For me, <strong>the</strong> cost, both in financial andhuman terms, of small custodial units is made.” 388 She acknowledged that issues such asstaffing models may require adaptation but she did not consider <strong>the</strong>se to beinsurmountable, giving <strong>the</strong> example of <strong>the</strong> 218 Centre in Scotland as proof that <strong>the</strong>proposition could work. 389384 Qq 247–248385 Q 287386 Q 166387 Q 5388 Q 16389 Q 16, Qq 25–26. In her report she proposed that staffing for such units would, over time, be removed from PrisonService control to be run by specialists.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!