11.07.2015 Views

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 <strong>Women</strong> <strong>offenders</strong>: <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> <strong>Report</strong>that women’s provision can be more costly to develop and deliver.” 261 Ian Porée assured usthat this could be mitigated by setting “very specific commissioning priorities, focused on<strong>the</strong> needs of women” so that providers will have to demonstrate that what <strong>the</strong>y offer forwomen <strong>offenders</strong> is credible and is likely to meet <strong>the</strong> objectives of reducing reoffending. 262130. The issue of perverse incentives arising from a payments by results system may bea particular problem for ensuring that appropriate provision is made for women<strong>offenders</strong> as <strong>the</strong>y are often classified for probation purposes as presenting a lower riskof reoffending or harm 263 but have a higher level of need, requiring more intensive, andcostly, intervention.Future funding arrangements for women’s centres131. Several witnesses feared that <strong>the</strong> needs of women would be lost in <strong>the</strong> proposed newfunding arrangements, particularly as <strong>the</strong> evidence of <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of women’s centreswas only just emerging and as economies of scale might mean that women would be“lumped in with men”. They also expressed concerns about <strong>the</strong> model of nationalcommissioning underpinning <strong>the</strong> Transforming Rehabilitation reforms, and <strong>the</strong> resultingloss of ring-fenced funding for women’s services, which may prove too restrictive to benefit<strong>the</strong> centres. 264 Liz Calderbank believed that <strong>the</strong> new commissioning arrangements couldrepresent “[...] ei<strong>the</strong>r a huge opportunity or a tremendous threat, and a lot of <strong>the</strong> outcomewill depend on how <strong>the</strong> arrangements are taken forward, and on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>commissioning arrangements take account of <strong>the</strong> demands of working with what areeffectively minority groups within <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system and <strong>the</strong> need to resourcethose effectively and ensure that <strong>the</strong>y are sustainable.” 265132. <strong>Women</strong>’s Breakout argued that it was too soon for women’s community services to besubject to <strong>the</strong> open market and called for grant funding to continue for a fur<strong>the</strong>r threeyears. 266 Jackie Russell, <strong>the</strong> organisation’s Director, highlighted that <strong>the</strong> motivations ofthose providing women’s centres may not be in step with <strong>the</strong> new commissioningarrangements:“They take [money for delivering services] because <strong>the</strong>y are concerned about <strong>the</strong>woman. They are working <strong>the</strong>re because <strong>the</strong>y are concerned about getting thatwoman into employment, not about saying <strong>the</strong>y are providing a service that takessomebody else’s outputs and claims <strong>the</strong> profit. There is a real need to understand <strong>the</strong>motivation behind voluntary sector organisations and why <strong>the</strong>y behave in a way thatis not necessarily commercial, because by behaving commercially <strong>the</strong>y have to walkaway. That is what PBR is doing.” 267261 Ev w63262 Q 312263 Statistics on women in <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system264 Q 82 [Mr Kilgarriff], Q 160 [Ms Lyon], Q 162 [Ms Crook]265 Q 216–Q223266 Ev 69267 Q 128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!