Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52 <strong>Women</strong> <strong>offenders</strong>: <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> <strong>Report</strong>that women’s provision can be more costly to develop and deliver.” 261 Ian Porée assured usthat this could be mitigated by setting “very specific commissioning priorities, focused on<strong>the</strong> needs of women” so that providers will have to demonstrate that what <strong>the</strong>y offer forwomen <strong>offenders</strong> is credible and is likely to meet <strong>the</strong> objectives of reducing reoffending. 262130. The issue of perverse incentives arising from a payments by results system may bea particular problem for ensuring that appropriate provision is made for women<strong>offenders</strong> as <strong>the</strong>y are often classified for probation purposes as presenting a lower riskof reoffending or harm 263 but have a higher level of need, requiring more intensive, andcostly, intervention.Future funding arrangements for women’s centres131. Several witnesses feared that <strong>the</strong> needs of women would be lost in <strong>the</strong> proposed newfunding arrangements, particularly as <strong>the</strong> evidence of <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of women’s centreswas only just emerging and as economies of scale might mean that women would be“lumped in with men”. They also expressed concerns about <strong>the</strong> model of nationalcommissioning underpinning <strong>the</strong> Transforming Rehabilitation reforms, and <strong>the</strong> resultingloss of ring-fenced funding for women’s services, which may prove too restrictive to benefit<strong>the</strong> centres. 264 Liz Calderbank believed that <strong>the</strong> new commissioning arrangements couldrepresent “[...] ei<strong>the</strong>r a huge opportunity or a tremendous threat, and a lot of <strong>the</strong> outcomewill depend on how <strong>the</strong> arrangements are taken forward, and on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>commissioning arrangements take account of <strong>the</strong> demands of working with what areeffectively minority groups within <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system and <strong>the</strong> need to resourcethose effectively and ensure that <strong>the</strong>y are sustainable.” 265132. <strong>Women</strong>’s Breakout argued that it was too soon for women’s community services to besubject to <strong>the</strong> open market and called for grant funding to continue for a fur<strong>the</strong>r threeyears. 266 Jackie Russell, <strong>the</strong> organisation’s Director, highlighted that <strong>the</strong> motivations ofthose providing women’s centres may not be in step with <strong>the</strong> new commissioningarrangements:“They take [money for delivering services] because <strong>the</strong>y are concerned about <strong>the</strong>woman. They are working <strong>the</strong>re because <strong>the</strong>y are concerned about getting thatwoman into employment, not about saying <strong>the</strong>y are providing a service that takessomebody else’s outputs and claims <strong>the</strong> profit. There is a real need to understand <strong>the</strong>motivation behind voluntary sector organisations and why <strong>the</strong>y behave in a way thatis not necessarily commercial, because by behaving commercially <strong>the</strong>y have to walkaway. That is what PBR is doing.” 267261 Ev w63262 Q 312263 Statistics on women in <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system264 Q 82 [Mr Kilgarriff], Q 160 [Ms Lyon], Q 162 [Ms Crook]265 Q 216–Q223266 Ev 69267 Q 128