Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev 74Justice Committee: EvidenceCatch22 Women’s ServiceClean BreakCyrenians (WOW) Women outside Walls ProjectEast Lancashire Women’s CentresEden HouseESCAPE Family Support—SWAN ProjectFemale Prisoners Welfare Project—HibiscusHafan CymruHalton Women’s CentreHull Women’s CentreJagonari Educational Resource CentreThe Nelson Trust—ISIS ProjectMissing LinkNew Dawn New DayNorth Wales Women’s CentreNottingham Women’s CentrePeterborough Women’s Centre—Dawn ProjectOne 25PACT Alana HousePankhurst Centre/Women MATTAPlatform 51Stonham Promise4WomenRe-UniteSafer WalesSalford FoundationSWAN (Northumberland)Together Women ProjectTees Valley Women’s CentreTogether (Working for Wellbeing)Trust (The Trust Women’s Project)Urban OutreachWell Women Centre (Evolve)Women@theWellWomenCentre—EvolveWomen in PrisonWomen’s Turnaround ProjectWomen’s WorkWorking ChanceSouthamptonLondonNewcastle upon TyneEast LancashireBristolNorthumberlandLondonCarmarthenHaltonHullLondonGloucesterBristolLeicesterRhylNottinghamPeterboroughBristolReadingManchesterNationalPlymouthNorfolkLondonCardiffEcclesBlythYorkshire and HumbersideMiddlesbroughLondonLondonBoltonWakefieldLondonCalderdale and KirkleesLondonLiverpoolDerbyLondonWritten evidence from Women in Prison 3Organisational response prepared by Laurel Townhead and Rachel Halford for Women in Prison. 4Summary of EvidenceThis submission of evidence is based on the unique experiences of our staff working with women affectedby the criminal justice system both in the community and in all 13 women’s prisons, and on freedom ofinformation requests used to elicit new evidence from the Ministry of Justice.Key points:1. To date a women’s criminal justice strategy that addresses sentencing, diversion, community, custodialsentences, governance structures with a clear leadership and accountability has not been published.2. The Committee should consider levels of expenditure, human resources and strategic cross departmentalgender focused leadership as a part of assessing commitment to change for women in the criminal justicesystem.3Founded in 1983 by Chris Tchaikovsky, Women in Prison work to reduce the number of women in prison and prevent thedamage done to women by imprisonment. We do this by providing information, advice and support services and campaigningfor the rights of women in the criminal justice system. Women in Prison believe that no woman should be sent to prison as itexists today. Women in Prison’s policy and campaigns work is based on our experience of delivering support services toover 4,000 women per annum in the criminal justice system (in prison and in the community). For more information seewww.womeninprison.org.uk4Women in Prison is a registered charity, registration number: 1118727
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 753. The lack of information under Freedom of Information requests from the Ministry of Justice and thecontinuous referral between departments provides concrete evidence that there is no integration regarding theseinitiatives and that departments are working in silo.4. The Criminal Justice System evidences some compliance with the gender equality duty. Howeversubstantive equality needs to be understood and applied in the provision of services for women offenders,and specify the need for a different approach to the mainstream commissioning and contracting of genderspecific services.5. The women’s custodial estate as it exists is not suitable for women with multiple and complex needs. Itis not a deterrent, it struggles to be a place of rehabilitation, the re-offending rates and levels of self harmevidence it does not work.6. Localisation of probation budgets lacks direction or any ring fenced money jeopardising the volume,range, quality, and sustainability of community provision for women.7. Women have a range of complex intersectional needs, Independent Voluntary sector specialistorganisations are best placed to provide effective services. They are under threat by changes in commissioningand contracting.With our submission we have included a report completed by Women in Prison in March, 2012, “Corston +5 Traffic Light report, this report clearly shows progress made against each of the 43 recommendations withinthe Corston ReportIntroductionFor over 28 years Women in Prison has been campaigning for radical reform of the criminal justice system,The Corston Report presented an opportunity to push forward that reform.Five years and two governments later not enough has been achieved. Women in Prison welcome the JusticeSelect Committees Inquiry to review progress and examine current strategy and practice. There is no question,and much evidence, that the current coalition government is in jeopardy of squandering any progress made bythe previous government within a regressive agenda—which will prove expensive in terms of financial andhuman cost.1. Strategy1.1 Lack of strategyThere is a fundamental lack of strategy within the current Ministry of Justice’s (MOJ) administration. Thisis evidenced in the absence of a women’s champion and the absence of a cross departmental women’s workinggroup, both of which could highlight and co-ordinate women’s needs and responding policy frameworks toother departments such as social services, health, employment, and education. The reduction of women’soffending, re-offending and imprisonment is not solely dependent on strategy and subsequent policy frameworkdelivered by the MOJ. Women’s pathways into the criminal justice system are as varied and complex as theirpathways out. Government departmental involvement should reflect this. However there needs to be a highlevel strategic driver for this to happen. At present there is no evidence of this.The nature of the current focus seems to be solely on the provision of community alternatives to custodyfor women with complex needs and non violent offences. Women in Prison welcome a clear focus on promotingand investing in community alternatives to custody. However, community alternatives to custody should notbe understood as an isolated solution to reducing the number of women in custody. In order to reduce thenumber of women in prison, the Government also needs to address the current sentencing framework, andreduce the powers of magistrates to imprison women on short sentences for non violent offences.On a number of occasions commitments have been made by the current coalition Government regarding thepublication of a women’s criminal justice strategy, including the Government report to CEDAW June, 2011.In its report the Government states that it is “developing a strategy that will ensure that women’s sentencedelivery, in both custodial and community environments, is fit for purpose and meets the complex needsof women”. 5We have been given varying dates from the MOJ women’s team when a documented Strategy will bepublished including December, 2012 and more recently September 2012.5UK submission to CEDAW June 2011http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/international-equality/7th-cedaw-report?view=Binary
Page 8 and 9:
Women offenders: after the Corston
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 21 and 22:
18 Women offenders: after the Corst
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 1Ora
Page 101 and 102:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 318
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 9Exa
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 15Tu
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 2315
Page 163 and 164: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 65Wr
Page 165 and 166: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 672.
Page 167 and 168: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 69fo
Page 171: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 73th
Page 175 and 176: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 77Wh
Page 179 and 180: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 81Ov
Page 181 and 182: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 83ar
Page 185 and 186: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 87Af
Page 187 and 188: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 89re
Page 189 and 190: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 91he
Page 191 and 192: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 93di
Page 193 and 194: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 95Wr
Page 197 and 198: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 99on
Page 199 and 200: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 101T
Page 201 and 202: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 103S
Page 203 and 204: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 105E
Page 205 and 206: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 107i
Page 207 and 208: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 109i
Page 209 and 210: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 111U
Page 213 and 214: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 115b
Page 215 and 216: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 117R
Page 221 and 222: Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 123w
Page 223 and 224:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 125r
Page 225 and 226:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 127I
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229:
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 131(
show all

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?