Ev 52 Justice Committee: EvidenceTuesday 26 March 2013Members present:Sir Alan Beith (Chair)Steve BrineJeremy CorbynMr Elfyn LlwydSeema MalhotraAndy McDonaldGraham Stringer________________Examination of WitnessesWitnesses: Helen Grant MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Ian Porée, RehabilitationProgramme Director, Ministry of Justice, and Michael Spurr, Chief Executive Officer, National OffenderManagement Service, gave evidence.Chair: I welcome <strong>the</strong> Minister and Mr Spurr back to<strong>the</strong> Committee and welcome Mr Porée. We have bonesto pick with your officials about how <strong>the</strong> Committeeshould be kept informed of things that are happening,but we do not propose to spend this meeting talkingabout <strong>the</strong>m, because we are more interested in <strong>the</strong>direction of travel in <strong>the</strong> document that was producedon Friday. Although brief, it has a direction of travelthat most of us very much welcome. I ask Mr Corbynto open up.Q250 Jeremy Corbyn: Thank you very much forcoming. You will be pleased to know that yesterday<strong>the</strong> Committee had a very good visit to HMP Styaland Adelaide House. We understand that you will bevisiting Adelaide House in <strong>the</strong> near future.Helen Grant: In May—and Styal as well.Q251 Jeremy Corbyn: Excellent. I hope you will beas impressed as we were with some of <strong>the</strong> work thathas been done.Helen Grant: I am looking forward to it.Q252 Jeremy Corbyn: The Secretary of Statehas twice told <strong>the</strong> Committee that he has separatedministerial responsibility for men and women inprisons. Has this happened? How is it working in <strong>the</strong>Department at <strong>the</strong> moment?Helen Grant: Yes, it certainly has happened. It reflects<strong>the</strong> fact that he sees clearly that women have specificneeds and certain issues that have to be recognised. Hedecided to put me in charge of women in <strong>the</strong> criminaljustice system. My colleague Minister, Jeremy Wright,is responsible for men in <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system, so<strong>the</strong>re is definite separation.Q253 Jeremy Corbyn: In your view, what are <strong>the</strong>specific needs of women in prison?Helen Grant: I think that women <strong>offenders</strong> are a highlyvulnerable group. They commit crime—not always, asI was quoted in one of <strong>the</strong> papers, but often—because<strong>the</strong>y are highly vulnerable and because of earlierfailures to protect and support <strong>the</strong>m. They often havedifferent needs from men. They are more likely thanmen to be victims of domestic violence and sexualabuse. They are more likely to self-harm and to havemental health problems, and <strong>the</strong>y are more likely to beprimary carers at <strong>the</strong> time and date of sentencing. Weare <strong>the</strong>refore dealing with a different situation. If we aregoing to be really serious about reducing reoffending,we have to address some of <strong>the</strong> root causes that leadwomen to offend. We have to deal with those causes,whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are drugs, alcohol or domestic violence.Q254 Jeremy Corbyn: In <strong>the</strong> light of your firstfew months as <strong>the</strong> Minister, what do you think <strong>the</strong>system does and does not do well in respect of womenprisoners and potential prisoners?Helen Grant: In <strong>the</strong> last few months, I have had <strong>the</strong>opportunity to visit a number of prisons. I have beento Holloway and Eastwood Park in Gloucester. Priorto becoming a Minister, I went to East Sutton Park,which is fairly near my constituency. I have been to <strong>the</strong>Elizabeth Fry approved centre, and I have been ableto visit <strong>the</strong> ISIS women’s centre in Gloucester, AlanaHouse in Reading and <strong>the</strong> Minerva women’s centre inLondon. To be perfectly honest with you, I have seensome very good practice both in prisons and in <strong>the</strong>women’s community facilities that I have been able tovisit.To give you an example, when I visited Holloway, Iwas able to see women being prepared and made readyfor work, in terms of clo<strong>the</strong>s and producing CVs,which is absolutely key. They are <strong>the</strong>n linked into anorganisation through <strong>the</strong> gate called Working Chance,which I have also been able to visit, so that, on release,a woman has a much better chance of finding a job. Ofcourse, when a woman finds a job, it gives structureto her life and puts some money in her pocket. As<strong>the</strong>y say, <strong>the</strong>re is also pride in her progress, whichis absolutely key in reducing reoffending. That is anexample of very good practice that I was able to seein prison.With regard to <strong>the</strong> women’s community facilities,which I like very much, I saw some fantasticpartnership working when I went to <strong>the</strong> ISIS women’scentre in Gloucester. I was able to sit in on partof a drug rehabilitation session where <strong>the</strong> womenwere challenged to change <strong>the</strong>ir life, which is what<strong>the</strong>se facilities can really do. Many still see <strong>the</strong>m asslightly easier options, but <strong>the</strong>y are not—<strong>the</strong>y reallydo challenge women to address <strong>the</strong> issues that caused<strong>the</strong>m to offend in <strong>the</strong> first place. That was very goodpractice that I saw <strong>the</strong>re. I also saw women being helpedto break <strong>the</strong> cycle of domestic violence. As I am sureyou know, many women in prison have been victimsof domestic violence. Speaking as someone who wasa domestic violence family lawyer for 23 years priorto becoming a politician, I know absolutely whatdomestic violence can do to a woman. It absolutely
Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 5326 March 2013 Helen Grant MP, Ian Porée and Michael Spurrcrushes self-confidence and self-esteem, which are<strong>the</strong> prerequisites, of course, for aspiration, motivation,success and, as far as we are concerned here, stoppingreoffending. Unless you can get that self-confidenceback and get rid of <strong>the</strong> perpetrator—<strong>the</strong> person who ispulling you down—<strong>the</strong> chances of being able to moveon are much reduced. I hope that has answered <strong>the</strong>question. I have seen an awful lot of good practice.Q255 Jeremy Corbyn: I agree with you aboutHolloway; it is in my area and I have visited it. Whatare <strong>the</strong> weak areas in treatment of women prisoners, inyour view, from what you have observed so far? Whatdo we not do well?Helen Grant: Can I bring my colleagues into this?I have with me <strong>the</strong> chief executive of NOMS, onmy right, and Ian Porée, who is dealing with our“Transforming Rehabilitation” programme and is incharge of commissioning. They may well have someinteresting comments on where we perhaps need to dobetter.Michael Spurr: I think we have been getting better attargeting our interventions to meet <strong>the</strong> specific needsof women, but <strong>the</strong>re is still more to do on that. Whatwe call our philosophy of segmentation is really abouttrying to identify <strong>the</strong> specific needs of an offendergroup and <strong>the</strong>n ensuring that we are putting resourcesinto meeting those needs. For a long time, we did notdo anything like sufficient work with women.Over recent years, we have accelerated <strong>the</strong> work wehave done to look at <strong>the</strong> specific needs of women. Thathas led us to develop particular programmes such as <strong>the</strong>CARE programme, which is running at Foston Hall at<strong>the</strong> minute and will run at New Hall. It targets womenwith complex needs <strong>after</strong> offences of violence against<strong>the</strong> person and is aimed specifically at those particularwomen. We are identifying <strong>the</strong> people who need thattype of programme. For example, we have been doingwork in <strong>the</strong> community with <strong>Women</strong>’s Aid to develop<strong>the</strong> freedom programme for women who have beeninvolved with domestic violence. Again, that is a veryspecific, targeted programme to meet particular needs.There is still fur<strong>the</strong>r work to do in that area, as we getbetter at understanding it. There is still not sufficientevidence about what <strong>the</strong> specific needs of women are;to be quite frank, <strong>the</strong>re is a frustrating lack of it. Onlyin recent years have we really targeted <strong>the</strong> group andlooked at what are <strong>the</strong> gender-specific issues that weshould be tackling. I think that is <strong>the</strong> area for fur<strong>the</strong>rdevelopment, although I want to make <strong>the</strong> point thatwe have been tackling that area and, I would have tosay, have made some considerable progress in it.Q256 Chair: Can I be clear about your ministerialresponsibility? When <strong>the</strong> Secretary of State came in, hetalked about being responsible for women in prisons.Does that extend to women <strong>offenders</strong>—women in <strong>the</strong>criminal justice system—generally? That is a questionto <strong>the</strong> Minister.Helen Grant: That is certainly my understanding of it.Q257 Chair: This is really a question for Mr Spurr.Might it not be a good thing if you were more readyto be frank about <strong>the</strong> weaknesses in <strong>the</strong> system,ra<strong>the</strong>r than rushing to claim <strong>the</strong> credit for <strong>the</strong> areasof improvement? Obviously, we are also interested inthose.Helen Grant: Are you addressing Mr Spurr?Chair: Any of you can answer <strong>the</strong> question, but itarose out of Mr Spurr’s earlier reply.Michael Spurr: I did say that I thought we needed to domore in that area. Equally, I wanted to say that it wasnot something we had just thought about and were notworking on. The response to <strong>the</strong> question was that I dothink we need to do more to target <strong>the</strong> specific needs ofwomen. I do not think I was being overly-defensive—Iwas trying to demonstrate that we had recognised <strong>the</strong>issue and were working on it. If I may say so, I do notthink it is unreasonable for somebody in my position tosay, “We have identified something that is wrong andare trying to put it right.” If I were not doing that, youwould be asking me why not.Helen Grant: On that matter, I think considerableimprovements and advancement have happened in<strong>the</strong> last six years, since Jean <strong>Corston</strong>’s report. A lothas happened; I may be asked about that later. Thereis also recognition of <strong>the</strong> fact that, just because <strong>the</strong>rehave been improvements, it does not mean that we are<strong>the</strong>re. Sadly, women are continuing to get involvedin crime, chaos, havoc and family breakdown, withchildren going into care and repossessions, and <strong>the</strong>reare still a lot of women in prison. As long as that is <strong>the</strong>situation and as long as I am responsible for this part of<strong>the</strong> portfolio, of course we will have to do more. Thatbrings me back to why we have published <strong>the</strong> strategicpriorities. It would, I hope, explain some of <strong>the</strong> contentas well.Q258 Andy McDonald: Good morning, Minister.We have heard from a lot of witnesses in <strong>the</strong> course ofour inquiry that, effectively, in <strong>the</strong> absence of visibleleadership, progress on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> agenda has stalled.Do you accept that, before your appointment, <strong>the</strong> MOJdid not give women’s offending <strong>the</strong> attention requiredto maintain progress on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> recommendations?Helen Grant: No, I don’t accept that at all. I think<strong>the</strong>re has been considerable movement on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong>recommendations. The Government have accepted 40out of 43 of <strong>the</strong>m. Michael at NOMS has implementedmany of <strong>the</strong>m. We have embedded gender-specificstandards, training and initiatives right across <strong>the</strong>prison regime. Michael referred to a superb facility thatruns in conjunction with <strong>Women</strong>’s Aid that really helpswomen in <strong>the</strong> prison regime to address issues such asdomestic violence. We have also ended routine fullsearching of females. We have established a womenspecificconditional caution. I think that is a very goodinitiative, because it allows a woman to be effectivelyassessed—to have a full needs assessment at one of <strong>the</strong>women’s centres. We have actually reduced <strong>the</strong> femaleestate by 400. NOMS has invested £3.78 million in <strong>the</strong>funding of 31 women’s centres around <strong>the</strong> country, <strong>the</strong>vast majority of which are doing a very good job oftackling <strong>the</strong> root cause of female offending. I wouldhave to disagree—I think a lot has been done. I ampleased with it, but of course we need to do more.Q259 Andy McDonald: How have your approachesto o<strong>the</strong>r Government Departments on <strong>the</strong>se mattersbeen received? Is <strong>the</strong>re <strong>the</strong> critical mass of women