11.07.2015 Views

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Justice Committee: Evidence Ev 415 March 2013 Liz Calderbank, Val Castell and Liz Rijnenbergnot have a women’s community project. That said,NOMS has provided some money for 2013–14 toextend women’s community projects to a few areas,particularly in <strong>the</strong> south-west—to Wiltshire and Dorset.I think that <strong>the</strong> absence of <strong>the</strong> national women’s team inNOMS has led to a standstill in <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong>strategy. It would be really helpful if representatives inDepartments across Government had a set of joined-uptargets to ensure that all <strong>the</strong> needs of women are met.One of <strong>the</strong> issues that causes me particular concern is<strong>the</strong> fact that we still do not have <strong>the</strong> resources necessaryto support women and <strong>the</strong>ir children to prevent <strong>the</strong>mfrom going into custody and to prevent those childrenbeing cared for by o<strong>the</strong>r people. Val mentioned <strong>the</strong>importance of residential alternatives for women, andthis is something that we should try to drive forward aspart of a wider strategy.Q196 Mr Llwyd: In several pieces of evidence thatwe have received in connection with this inquiry, <strong>the</strong>rehas been concern that this problem is not recognisedacross various Departments, as you rightly highlight.Liz Rijnenberg: That would be an excellent idea.Q197 Mr Llwyd: That’s a pretty succinct answer.Liz Rijnenberg: It’s not a complicated notion, is it?Q198 Chair: It is also an interesting answer, becauseI think that Mrs Grant would say that she was <strong>the</strong> leadMinister.Liz Rijnenberg: Well, yes.Val Castell: I think that she would also benefit frombeing backed up by people with a clear duty to lead in<strong>the</strong> various different Government Departments.Q199 Mr Llwyd: As a one-time practitioner myself,I am obviously interested in <strong>the</strong> sentencing process.May I ask, Ms Castell, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re has been adifference of approach by magistrates in <strong>the</strong> way that<strong>the</strong>y sentence women since <strong>Corston</strong>?Val Castell: There has, in those areas that have hadaccess to alternative sentences, especially in thoseareas that have had <strong>the</strong> intensive alternative to custodypilots running in <strong>the</strong>m. I shall refer to IACs insteadof trotting out <strong>the</strong> full name of intensive alternative tocustody all <strong>the</strong> time.Where you have had <strong>the</strong> IACs running, <strong>the</strong>re has beena very clear lead from <strong>the</strong> probation service to makesure that magistrates know <strong>the</strong> implications of usingcustodial sentences as opposed to alternatives, wherepossible. There has been a great deal of very good workon putting toge<strong>the</strong>r robust alternatives, and magistrateshave had faith in those alternatives and have used<strong>the</strong>m. Where you have not had IACs running, <strong>the</strong>rehas been some use of community sentences instead ofcustodial ones, but that has been limited by <strong>the</strong> fact that<strong>the</strong> community sentences have only been alternativecommunity sentences for women; <strong>the</strong>y have not beencustodial alternatives.We tend to approach sentencing in quite a linear way,and our sentencing guidelines tend to lead us downthis route. It’s low-level risk; it’s final discharge; it’smedium-level; it’s community sentence; it’s over <strong>the</strong>custody threshold. If you have come to <strong>the</strong> point in <strong>the</strong>sentencing guidelines where it says, “This offence isso serious, you’re over <strong>the</strong> custody threshold,” <strong>the</strong>n,when looking for community alternatives, you tend tobe looking for something that is more robust than astandard community option. By and large, even wherewomen’s sentences exist, if all <strong>the</strong>y are offering is astandard community option, that still does not reallygive us all <strong>the</strong> options that we need to look at custodialalternatives.Q200 Mr Llwyd: Would I be right in thinking, forexample—this is something that I have raised before in<strong>the</strong> House—that people who are drug addicted who goon a community sentence will breach, unless <strong>the</strong>y aretaken off drugs to begin with, because of <strong>the</strong>ir chaoticlifestyle. That is inevitable, is it not?Val Castell: I would not say completely inevitable,but it is quite likely. If somebody breaches, it doesnot necessarily mean that <strong>the</strong>y would automaticallygo into custody, because we look very carefully,when somebody comes into court for breach, atwhat probation is telling us on <strong>the</strong> breach report. Ifsomebody is trying but finding it difficult, that is avery different story from somebody who is not tryingat all. If somebody is trying and finding it difficult,we will look to see whe<strong>the</strong>r we can let <strong>the</strong> sentencerun and whe<strong>the</strong>r we can get it completed, and to seewhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are ways that we can help with getting itcompleted. Custody very much tends to be a last ditch,if somebody really is not complying.Q201 Nick de Bois: I would like to turn, if I may,to <strong>the</strong> current approach to women <strong>offenders</strong>. Myquestion is directed first to Ms Calderbank—and to MsRijnenberg, if you wish to follow up on this.Can you explain what sort of provision is made by trustsfor women <strong>offenders</strong> serving community sentences inareas without a women’s centre? Is <strong>the</strong>re a notabledifference in levels of performance—or should I sayoutcome?—between areas that have gender-specificservices and those that do not?Liz Calderbank: The answer to that question is <strong>the</strong>same as <strong>the</strong> one before. It is actually very variable, asyou would probably anticipate.Q202 Nick de Bois: May I help? I was sensing thatwe were coming on to that ground. I suppose that <strong>the</strong>question is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is a discernible general shiftbetween <strong>the</strong> two—where <strong>the</strong>re are services or not. Isuspect that you will point out that each area is verydifferent. I suppose that I am looking for a pattern.Liz Rijnenberg: I do not think that we have anystatistical evidence of notable differences in areasthat do not have women’s community centres. Wehave national data in relation to reoffending and shortcustodial sentences, but it is questionable whe<strong>the</strong>r thatwould be comparable across trusts. The importantthing is <strong>the</strong> added value that you get from a women’scommunity centre, because you have a number ofservices all in one place, which is very important.In areas where <strong>the</strong>re are no community centres, <strong>the</strong>probation trusts and local partnerships have donewhat <strong>the</strong>y can to provide <strong>the</strong> best possible service. Forexample, in Swindon in Wiltshire, where <strong>the</strong>re is nowomen’s community project, Barnardo’s runs a serviceat one of <strong>the</strong> family centres, where women can go and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!