Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
Women offenders: after the Corston Report - United Kingdom ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ev 30 Justice Committee: Evidence29 January 2013 Juliet Lyon CBE, Frances Crook OBE and Clive Martinhalf empty. The statistics bear that out. If you look at<strong>the</strong> research, very few women have visits. Often, <strong>the</strong>reis no one at home who is looking <strong>after</strong> <strong>the</strong> childrenwho would be prepared to take <strong>the</strong>m to visit <strong>the</strong>ir mum.Sometimes, <strong>the</strong>y don’t want visits. A colleague of mineat Prison Reform Trust, when she was in prison, didnot want her daughter to visit; she felt it would be tootraumatic and was prepared to forgo that. It was verypainful, I know, for her but she could not bear herdaughter coming into that environment.Q151 Mr Llwyd: Is it true as well that <strong>the</strong>re would bea number of kids, unfortunately, who would be takeninto care due to those circumstances?Juliet Lyon: Yes, but it is a smaller percentage thanpublic perception. Records we have been able toexamine indicate less than 10%. The vast majorityare farmed out to family and friends. Sometimes thatis successful, sometimes not. But a lot more care andattention could be paid to dependent children. It waspleasing to see <strong>the</strong> Sentencing Council changing <strong>the</strong>irguidelines in relation to drugs offences and looking,in relation to mitigation, at people with primary careresponsibilities, which obviously included <strong>the</strong> few menwho are lone dads as well as <strong>the</strong> single mums.Mr Llwyd: Thank you.Frances Crook: The Howard League gave evidence to<strong>the</strong> UN special day of discussion on <strong>the</strong> children ofprisoners, and we published a report on <strong>the</strong> childrenof women prisoners. We estimate—nobody knowsexactly—that around 17,000 children every year areaffected by <strong>the</strong> imprisonment of <strong>the</strong>ir mo<strong>the</strong>r. So I hopethat <strong>the</strong> review will not just look at <strong>the</strong> prison estateand provision for women once <strong>the</strong>y are sentenced butwill look more widely at sentencing patterns and <strong>the</strong>unnecessary use of custody.One of my concerns is particularly <strong>the</strong> unnecessary useof quite intrusive community sentences. As Juliet says,sometimes prison is used as respite care for womenbut also magistrates sometimes over‐sentence womento very onerous conditions in community sentencesbecause <strong>the</strong>y want to help sort out <strong>the</strong>ir lives. Theymay get a woman in front of <strong>the</strong>m who is very chaoticand needy and, in a benevolent way, <strong>the</strong>y think that if<strong>the</strong>y pile on <strong>the</strong> provisions this can help sort her out.Of course, it does not. What it does is ensures that shewill breach because she cannot do it and she will <strong>the</strong>nend up in custody as a result of that.So a review of <strong>the</strong> estate cannot just look at <strong>the</strong> prisonsociety, what happens in a prison. The answer to thatquestion will inevitably be wrong because it is <strong>the</strong>wrong question. We do not want to look at what happensto women in prison because we want to make sure <strong>the</strong>ydo not go <strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> first place. It is expensive anddamaging and it leads to more crime. What we shouldbe looking at in any review is a much wider vision ofsentencing options, sentencing practice, communityprovision, funding arrangements and gender‐specificservices.Q152 Yasmin Qureshi: Good morning. I want toask questions regarding reducing <strong>the</strong> use of custodyand expanding community‐based provisions. Despiteall <strong>the</strong> changes that have been taking place in <strong>the</strong>last number of years—and <strong>the</strong>re seems to have beenagreement or cross‐political consensus on this issueabout trying to reduce <strong>the</strong> number of women inprisons—as <strong>the</strong> Howard League has noted, <strong>the</strong>re hasbeen no real discernible impact on <strong>the</strong> number ofwomen in prison, and in fact <strong>the</strong> number of womenwho are imprisoned who are assessed as being at ahigher risk of harm to <strong>the</strong>mselves and o<strong>the</strong>rs is about3.2%. The Lucy Faithfull Foundation has expressedthat perhaps sometimes too much emphasis has beenplaced on women who have not committed seriousoffences and not enough on <strong>the</strong> vulnerable women. Doyou agree with <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> progress that has beenmade since <strong>the</strong> <strong>Corston</strong> report came out in expanding<strong>the</strong> network of community centres and diversionschemes has not impacted on <strong>the</strong> number of women inprison? What do you think, realistically, can be done,in addition to what has already been done, to help keepvulnerable women from custody and from <strong>the</strong> criminaljustice system itself? What practical fur<strong>the</strong>r steps canbe taken?Clive Martin: There is such a leadership gap here. Iwill give you an example which I think demonstratesthat. I chair something called <strong>the</strong> Ministry of JusticeReducing Re‐offending Third Sector AdvisoryGroup. We were asked by Crispin Blunt to prepare anoverview on behalf of <strong>the</strong> voluntary sector of what wesaw in commissioning for women’s services and howwe could redesign <strong>the</strong> system, which we did. That wassubmitted. Despite it being requested at that level, <strong>the</strong>rehas been absolutely no engagement from <strong>the</strong> Ministryof Justice around that, so much to <strong>the</strong> extent that inDecember we decided to have a public conference: 120people came; Dame Helena Kennedy gave <strong>the</strong> keynoteaddress; it was chaired by Dame Anne Owers; and noone from <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Justice even turned up at thatconference. So <strong>the</strong>re is a yawning gap in leadership in<strong>the</strong> sector.The reason I made that point is that years ago ProfessorRod Morgan did some research around how, unlesssentencers are kept aware of issues to do with who<strong>the</strong>y are sentencing, <strong>the</strong> type of sentences <strong>the</strong>y giveand so on, it falls from <strong>the</strong>ir agenda. There has beenno consistent leadership around this issue for a longtime. We do not see it in training programmes for <strong>the</strong>judiciary, and we do not see community alternatives tocustody being promoted in <strong>the</strong> media.Returning to <strong>the</strong> previous discussion, things like smallcustodial units do not sound like prisons, so people shyaway from promoting <strong>the</strong>m. It is really difficult justto point to one thing, but what I think we can pointto is a general lack of taking this issue seriously assomething that can be progressed at almost every levelfrom political and official level right <strong>the</strong> way down.That is what needs to be addressed, and it is where mycolleagues here and o<strong>the</strong>r colleagues in <strong>the</strong> room from<strong>the</strong> third sector are really trying to push on this agendabecause it is quite difficult to see where that leadershipis going to come from.Q153 Yasmin Qureshi: Leaving <strong>the</strong> issue about<strong>the</strong> leadership to one side—say you had a fantasticleadership—what we are asking about here is whatpractical things can be done? What fur<strong>the</strong>r do you thinkcan be done to try to reduce <strong>the</strong> number of women inprison? We hear <strong>the</strong>re are women’s centres coming up.