11.07.2015 Views

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 Dr. Constable's Notes on 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> 2007 Edition"When God issues a decree that is plainly intended as irrevocable, as inthe rejection <strong>of</strong> Saul, then, says our text, there is no possibility <strong>of</strong> thatdecree being rescinded (cf. Nu. 23:19)." 177Saul had established a long record <strong>of</strong> rebellious behavior. God knew that Saul'sconfession was not genuine and his repentance was not real. Saul may have thought thathe could "con" God, but He could not. He behaved toward God as a manipulative childdeals with his or her parents. Rather than having a heart to please God, as David did, Saulonly obeyed God when he felt that it was to his advantage to do so. He wanted tomaintain control and to receive the glory. <strong>Samuel</strong> reminded the king that Yahweh was the"Glory <strong>of</strong> Israel." Saul may have been bowing down in repentance in <strong>Samuel</strong>'s presence,though the text does not say that, but he was standing up inside. It was that unbendingresistance to God's complete will that made Saul unusable as Israel's king."Saul, as this chapter in particular would have us understand, was a man incontention with Yahweh in a way that David, for all his lurid sins, neverwas." 178Saul's lack <strong>of</strong> submission was an even more serious sin than David's sins <strong>of</strong> murder andadultery. God did not remove the kingship from David for his sins, but He did from Saul."To be king in Israel was . . . quite a different matter from being king inthe countries round about. Saul did not understand this distinction, andresented <strong>Samuel</strong>'s 'interference,' whereas David appreciated the point thatthe Lord his God was the focus <strong>of</strong> authority, and therefore he was willingto submit to the word <strong>of</strong> his prophet even though, in the eyes <strong>of</strong> thewatching world, it must have seemed that David's own authority wouldthereby be weakened. Here lay the crucial distinction between Saul andDavid. The man after God's own heart submitted to God's word, obeyedhis prophets, and found acceptance and forgiveness, despite his manyglaring faults and failures. Saul obstinately clung to his rights as king, butlost his throne." 179Perhaps <strong>Samuel</strong> consented to honor Saul by worshipping with him (vv. 30-31) becauseSaul was still the king. It was good that Saul wanted to honor Yahweh in the eyes <strong>of</strong> thepeople by worshipping Him. Perhaps Saul's sincere though shallow contrition moved<strong>Samuel</strong> to be more cooperative and gracious (cf. v. 26). 180 Note Saul's continuingobsession with external appearances.177 Gordon, p. 146.178 Ibid., p. 142.179 Baldwin, p. 35. Remember this observation when you read about God pardoning David's gross sins in 2<strong>Samuel</strong>.180 Most <strong>of</strong> the commentators believed <strong>Samuel</strong> did not sin in returning with Saul. For the reasons <strong>of</strong> onewriter who thought he did, see Peter N. Greenhow, "Did <strong>Samuel</strong> Sin?" Grace Journal 11:2 (1970):34-40.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!