11.07.2015 Views

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2007 Edition Dr. Constable's Notes on 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> 53God caused the Philistines to fight one another (v. 20; cf. Judg. 7:22; 2 Chron. 20:23).Some Israelite deserters or mercenaries who were fighting for the Philistines evenchanged their allegiance and took sides with Jonathan. The tide <strong>of</strong> battle had turned.Beth-aven stood near Michmash, but the exact site is uncertain.3. Saul's cursing <strong>of</strong> Jonathan 14:24-46Jonathan, a man <strong>of</strong> faith, initiated a great victory, but in this section we see that Saul, aman <strong>of</strong> pride, limited the extent <strong>of</strong> that victory while trying to extend it. Saul's failure tosubmit to Yahweh's authority resulted in his behaving foolishly more than wickedly (atthis time).Saul's selfishness 14:24-35Saul's improper view <strong>of</strong> his role as Israel's king comes through clearly in verse 24. ThePhilistines were not Saul's enemies as much as God's enemies. This was holy war (cf.Judg. 16:28), but Saul viewed the battle too personally. His selfish desire to win for hisown glory led him to issue a foolish command.An oath was an extremely serious matter in the ancient Near East (v. 26; cf. Judg. 14:8-9). One did not violate a king's oath without suffering severe consequences. Jonathan sawthe folly <strong>of</strong> Saul's oath clearly because he wanted God's glory (vv. 29-30). The Hebrewword translated "troubled" (v. 29, 'akar) is the same one from which "Achan" and"Achor" (Josh. 7:25-26) come. Saul, not Jonathan, had troubled Israel, as Achan had, byhis foolish command (v. 24).Aijalon (v. 31) stood about 17 miles west <strong>of</strong> Michmash. Verses 32-34 illustrate theconfusion that resulted from Saul's misguided oath. The Mosaic Law forbade eating meatwith the blood not drained from it (Lev. 17:10-14). The great stone (v. 33) served as aslaughtering table where the priests carefully prepared the meat for eating.Saul was not entirely insensitive to Yahweh and His will. We can see this in his concernto observe the ritual dietary law (v. 33) and his desire to honor God for the victory (v. 35;cf. Exod. 17:14-16). 159 There are many examples <strong>of</strong> spiritually sensitive Israelitesbuilding altars to God (e.g., 7: 17; Gen. 12:8; Judg. 6:24; 2 Sam. 24:25; 1 Chron. 21:18).The writer's note that this was the first altar that Saul built reflects the king's general lack<strong>of</strong> commitment to Yahweh.Saul's blindness to his guilt 14:36-46Evidently Saul would not have inquired <strong>of</strong> God if Ahijah (cf. v. 18) had not suggestedthat he do so (v. 36). Probably God did not answer his prayer immediately because Saulwanted this information to vindicate himself rather than God (v. 37). Saul thought Goddid not answer him because someone had violated his rule (v. 24), which he confusedwith God's law, calling violation <strong>of</strong> it sin (v. 38; cf. Josh. 7:14). Really, God did not159 Gordon, p. 140, believed Saul built this altar simply to make amends for his legal infringement, not toexpress gratitude for the day's victory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!