11.07.2015 Views

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2007 Edition Dr. Constable's Notes on 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> 23period <strong>of</strong> the judges the Israelites as a whole had adopted an increasingly pagan attitudetoward Yahweh. They felt that they could satisfy Him with simply formal worship andthat they could secure His help with <strong>of</strong>ferings rather than humility. They were treating theark the same way they treated God. They believed the ark's presence among them inbattle would insure victory."We eventually all learn what Israel discovered in battle against thePhilistines. Having the paraphernalia <strong>of</strong> God and having God are not thesame." 60The paraphernalia that modern believers sometimes rely on in place <strong>of</strong> God include acrucifix, a picture <strong>of</strong> Jesus, or a family Bible positioned conspicuously in the home butseldom read. Others base their hope <strong>of</strong> spiritual success on a spiritually strong spouse,regular church attendance, or even the daily reading <strong>of</strong> the Bible. These things are nosubstitute for a vital personal relationship with God.Perhaps the elders <strong>of</strong> Israel remembered that in Joshua's conquest <strong>of</strong> Jericho the arkplayed a very important and visible part in the victory (Josh. 6:2-20). Nevertheless thenthe people trusted in Yahweh, not in the ark as a talisman. The custom <strong>of</strong> taking idols intobattle so their gods would deliver them was common among ancient warriors (cf. 2 Sam.5:21; 1 Chron. 14:12). Obviously the Israelites were wrong in thinking that the presence<strong>of</strong> the ark would guarantee success."The <strong>of</strong>fenses against the ark as pledge <strong>of</strong> Yahweh's presence appear to bemainly <strong>of</strong> two kinds: (1) a misplaced reliance on the ark, and (2) anirreverent disregard for the ark." 61The Hebrew word eleph, translated thousand (v. 2), can also mean military unit. Militaryunits were <strong>of</strong> varying sizes but considerably smaller than 1,000 soldiers. 62Ancient Near Eastern artists sometimes pictured a king sitting on a throne supported oneither side by a cherub, which the artist represented as a winged lion (sphinx) with ahuman head. 63 This may have been the image <strong>of</strong> the Lord <strong>of</strong> hosts (armies) "who sitsabove the cherubim" that the writer had in mind here (v. 4).The fact that the people shouted loudly when the ark arrived at Ebenezer from Shiloh (v.5) may be another indication that they were hoping to duplicate the victory at Jericho (cf.Josh. 6:20). Likewise the response <strong>of</strong> the Philistines when they heard the cry recallsRahab's revelation <strong>of</strong> how the Canaanites feared Yahweh (Josh 2:9-11). These allusionsto the victory at Jericho contrast the Israelites' present attitude toward God with what ithad been at that earlier battle.60 Kenneth L. Chafin, 1, 2 <strong>Samuel</strong>, p. 54.61 Marten H. Woudstra, The Ark <strong>of</strong> the Covenant from the Conquest to Kingship, p. 55.62 For more information concerning the problem <strong>of</strong> large numbers in the Old Testament, see R. E. D. Clark,"The Large Numbers <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament," Journal <strong>of</strong> Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Victoria Institute 87 (1955):82-92; and J. W. Wenham, "Large Numbers in the Old Testament," Tyndale Bulletin 18 (1967):19-53.63 W. F. Albright, "What Were the Cherubim?" Biblical Archaeologist 1:1 (1938):1-3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!