11.07.2015 Views

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2007 Edition Dr. Constable's Notes on 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> 21were the Lord's anointed, above himself. In many respects he foreshadowed the LordJesus <strong>Christ</strong>.Chapters 1 through 3 prepare us for the rest <strong>of</strong> 1 and 2 <strong>Samuel</strong> historically andtheologically. They teach us that God responds to the faith <strong>of</strong> people, even insignificantpeople. A barren, despised woman became the mother <strong>of</strong> Israel's most powerful manbecause she trusted and obeyed God. This was a complete reversal <strong>of</strong> what one wouldnaturally expect. These chapters also show that God blesses with fertility those whocommit to His revealed will contained in His law, but He cuts <strong>of</strong>f those who do not."The birth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Samuel</strong> was God's means <strong>of</strong> dealing with His chosen people.The rest <strong>of</strong> the narrative deals with a similar theme. The righteous oneswho are chosen by God will prosper while the ones who are chosen by thepeople and oppose God's rule will be cut <strong>of</strong>f. This is true even if thosewho oppose God's rule (i.e., Eli and his sons) are a part <strong>of</strong> the covenantcommunity." 53Note that there are four conflicts and reversals <strong>of</strong> fortune in these chapters: Peninnah andHannah (ch. 1), the arrogant and the innocent (2:1-10), Eli's sons and <strong>Samuel</strong> (2:11-36),and Eli's line <strong>of</strong> priests and <strong>Samuel</strong>'s line <strong>of</strong> prophets (3:1—4:1a). God decides who willprosper and who will perish. The basis <strong>of</strong> His judgment is His faithfulness to what He hassaid He will do when people respond to His will (Deut. 28).II. THE HISTORY OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT 4:1B—7:1Most serious students <strong>of</strong> 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> have noted the writer's emphasis on the ark <strong>of</strong> thecovenant beginning here in the text. Critical scholars have long argued that 4:1b—7:1 and2 <strong>Samuel</strong> 6 are the only remaining fragments <strong>of</strong> an older and longer ark narrative, whichwas a source document for the writer here. 54 More recently some scholars have come tobelieve that the old ark narratives were somewhat shorter. Conservative scholarsgenerally believe that the ark narratives were not necessarily independent documents butmay simply reflect the writer's particular emphasis on the ark here. 55A. THE CAPTURE OF THE ARK 4:1B-22A new subject comes to the forefront in this section and continues to be a significantmotif throughout the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Samuel</strong>. It is the ark <strong>of</strong> the covenant. The writer drewattention to the ark in this chapter by mentioning it seven times, including a notation atthe end <strong>of</strong> each text section (vv. 4, 11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22). Following the reference to<strong>Samuel</strong> the prophet in 4:1, the writer did not mention him again until 7:3."The purpose <strong>of</strong> the story in 1 Sam. 4-6 <strong>of</strong> the ark's imprisonment inPhilistia and its travels to different Philistine cities, as well as to Beth-Shemesh, is to give an historical background for the Philistines' rule over53 John A. Martin, "Studies in 1 and 2 <strong>Samuel</strong>," Bibliotheca Sacra 141:561 (January-March 1984):32.54 Of the 61 references to the ark in 1 and 2 <strong>Samuel</strong>, 36 appear in 1 Sam. 4:1b—7:2.55 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> this rather technical subject, including a bibliography <strong>of</strong> books and articles dealingwith it, see Youngblood, pp. 593-94.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!