1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ
1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ
1 Samuel - Odessa, Missouri Community of Christ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14 Dr. Constable's Notes on 1 <strong>Samuel</strong> 2007 Editionthose who appear to be important become unimportant. The crucial factor for them asIsraelites was their response to the will <strong>of</strong> God as contained in the Mosaic Covenant.God will bless people who want to further His program in the world by making itpossible for them to do that. He will even do supernatural things to enable them to do so.Natural limitations do not limit God. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> what God has revealed about Himselfand His program is what God uses to inspire trust in Himself and interest in His program.God will even reverse the fortunes <strong>of</strong> people in response to their response to His will.B. THE CONTRAST BETWEEN SAMUEL AND ELI'S SONS 2:11-36<strong>Samuel</strong>'s innocence and the godlessness <strong>of</strong> Eli's sons contrast strongly in this pericope(section <strong>of</strong> text). <strong>Samuel</strong> would succeed and become a channel <strong>of</strong> God's blessing. Eli'ssons would fail, would become a source <strong>of</strong> frustration to Eli and to the Israelites, andwould ultimately perish."The section [2:11—4:1] poignantly illustrates the theme <strong>of</strong> 'Hannah'sSong' as it is epitomized in 2:7b, 'he brings low, and also exalts'. For it isunder the auspices <strong>of</strong> God who has determined the ruin <strong>of</strong> Hophni andPhinehas that <strong>Samuel</strong> makes his mark." 331. Eli's sons' wickedness 2:11-17Eli's sons were not only evil in their personal lives, but they flagrantly disregarded thewill <strong>of</strong> God even as they served as leaders <strong>of</strong> Israel's worship. They neither knew theLord (in the sense <strong>of</strong> paying attention to Him, v. 12) nor treated His <strong>of</strong>ferings as special(v. 17; cf. Mal. 1:6-14). The writer documented these evaluations with two instances <strong>of</strong>their specific practices (vv. 13-14, and 15-16). The Law ordered the priests to handle the<strong>of</strong>ferings in particular ways to respect God's holiness (cf. Lev. 3:3, 5; 7:34; Deut. 18:3).However, Eli's sons served God the way they chose (cf. Korah's behavior in Num. 32).The Law allowed the priests to take for themselves the breast and upper part <strong>of</strong> the rightrear leg <strong>of</strong> animals brought as peace <strong>of</strong>ferings (Lev. 7:30-34). But Eli's sons took all thatthe three-pronged fork brought up when plunged into the remaining meat being boiled forthe sacrificial meal (vv. 13-14). The priests were to burn the best part <strong>of</strong> the sacrifices onthe altar as <strong>of</strong>ferings to God, but Eli's sons demanded for themselves raw meat that wasnot cooked at all (vv. 15-16). Meat was luxurious food in Israel's economy, so Eli's sonswere living <strong>of</strong>f the fat <strong>of</strong> the land. They were worthless men (v. 12, i.e., wicked in God'ssight; cf. 1:16)."To this day, arrogant assertiveness and self-seeking are temptations to allthose in positions <strong>of</strong> great power in society." 3433 Robert P. Gordon, I & II <strong>Samuel</strong>: A Commentary, p. 81.34 Payne, p. 18.