Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Foreword<br />
The provision <strong>of</strong> reliable and secure energy to<br />
meet the growing demands <strong>of</strong> this century, in a<br />
way which mitigates the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
change, is an existential challenge to the human<br />
enterprise. A failure to meet the challenge would<br />
pose grave risks to the functioning <strong>of</strong> world economies,<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> societies and our endangered<br />
ecosphere. In fact, the degree <strong>of</strong> success in this<br />
area will be a big determinant <strong>of</strong> whether this will<br />
be the best or the worst century for humankind.<br />
One proposed method for improving the economic,<br />
environmental and energy-security performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the U.S. power sector is the adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> distributed power systems (DPS), a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> distributed generation and electricity storage<br />
technologies. In this inter-disciplinary paper,<br />
scholars from the Brookings Institution’s <strong>Energy</strong><br />
Security Initiative and the Hoover Institution’s<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> Task Force evaluate the case for greater<br />
deployment <strong>of</strong> DPS. The chapters which follow<br />
set out a number <strong>of</strong> considered conclusions and<br />
clear recommendations for all policy makers who<br />
have a responsibility for ensuring the security and<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> our energy system now and for<br />
future generations.<br />
Strobe Talbott<br />
President<br />
Brookings Institution<br />
aSSESSIng THE ROlE OF dISTRIBuTEd POwER SySTEmS In THE u.S. POwER SECTOR<br />
III<br />
Many energy analysts have noted the potential<br />
for DPS to become a major part <strong>of</strong> our electricity<br />
infrastructure. The recent drop in key technology<br />
costs has brought this potential closer to<br />
reality. But in this rapidly developing field, the<br />
great progress on the technological front has yet<br />
to be fully matched by progress in policy making.<br />
And major questions <strong>of</strong> affordability, integration,<br />
and security remain to be answered before we can<br />
determine what role distributed energy sources<br />
should play in our future energy system.<br />
DPS <strong>of</strong>fers the potential for more reliable, secure,<br />
and green energy. It can encompass everything<br />
from fuel cells providing electricity and clean water<br />
to a remote army outpost in Afghanistan to<br />
solar panels on the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a home in Arizona. At<br />
the same time, possible pitfalls related to DPS use<br />
must be seriously and realistically addressed before<br />
we make a major commitment to a distributed<br />
energy future.<br />
This report provides a comprehensive survey <strong>of</strong><br />
the current technology and policy landscape <strong>of</strong><br />
DPS and <strong>of</strong>fers recommendations for its future<br />
use. As it highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> an emerging,<br />
critical policy issue that has not received the<br />
full attention it merits until now, we believe the<br />
report will be useful to policy makers and practitioners<br />
alike.<br />
George P. Shultz<br />
Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished Fellow<br />
The Hoover Institution