26.11.2012 Views

Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)

Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)

Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

figure 7: aVoided cosT comParison<br />

<strong>Levelized</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> ($/<strong>MWh</strong>)<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$ 80<br />

$ 60<br />

$ 40<br />

$ 20<br />

$ 0<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Only<br />

Coal Region<br />

<strong>Avoided</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Comparison</strong><br />

<strong>Energy</strong> & Capacity <strong>Energy</strong> Only<br />

aSSESSIng THE ROlE OF dISTRIBuTEd POwER SySTEmS In THE u.S. POwER SECTOR<br />

24<br />

Natural Gas Region<br />

$7.5/MMBtu<br />

$4/MMBtu<br />

<strong>Levelized</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> ($/<strong>MWh</strong>)<br />

capital and fixed costs associated with the need<br />

to build new plants. Thus, when comparing the<br />

distributed resource to the avoided cost, it is critical<br />

to ask whether or not the resource can provide<br />

peak power, as a significant amount <strong>of</strong> the avoided<br />

cost may come from avoided transmission and<br />

distribution capacity and peak generation capacity.<br />

This means that to achieve maximum avoided<br />

cost value, the distributed system must be located<br />

close to load at a congested node which would<br />

otherwise require a transmission or distribution<br />

upgrade. For the natural gas region, the energy<br />

value is shown assuming a low natural gas price<br />

<strong>of</strong> $4/MMBtu reflecting continued low gas prices<br />

perhaps from shale gas, and a higher price <strong>of</strong><br />

$7.50/MMBtu which reflects higher prices and<br />

restricted or limited impact from shale gas.<br />

2.2 Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> / Benefit <strong>Comparison</strong><br />

Figure 8 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the LCOE <strong>of</strong><br />

a range <strong>of</strong> distributed generation technologies to<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> & Capacity<br />

Distribution<br />

Transmission<br />

Fuel and Variable O&M<br />

Capital and Fixed<br />

the regional coal and natural gas avoided costs.<br />

The minimum avoided cost is about $25/<strong>MWh</strong> in<br />

coal regions which is representative <strong>of</strong> the energy<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> coal. For the natural gas region, the minimum<br />

is about $40/<strong>MWh</strong> reflecting low natural<br />

gas price. The high end <strong>of</strong> the avoided cost spectrum<br />

is similar based on displacement <strong>of</strong> either<br />

natural gas or coal-fired generation and includes<br />

capital and fixed costs for new power plant construction<br />

as well as higher avoided transmission<br />

and distribution capacity costs and a higher gas<br />

price. To achieve this level <strong>of</strong> benefit, a generator<br />

would need to produce energy during peak hours<br />

in a location with planned distribution and transmission<br />

capacity investments and be located in an<br />

area without excess generation capacity.<br />

The distributed resources which are closest to the<br />

current avoided cost <strong>of</strong> the centralized generation<br />

system are gas turbines and internal combustion<br />

(IC) engines with combined heat and power<br />

(CHP), and the larger solar project sizes. Wind

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!