Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
Avoided Cost Comparison Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 1<br />
overview oF distributed Power systems<br />
1.1 DPS in context<br />
For the past century, the U.S. electric power system<br />
has operated predominately on a model <strong>of</strong> centralized<br />
electricity generation, with power being delivered<br />
to end users via a long-distance transmission<br />
and distribution infrastructure. The original<br />
rationale for the centralized model was economically<br />
compelling. Economies <strong>of</strong> scale in the construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> generation assets coupled with the<br />
highly capital-intensive nature <strong>of</strong> generation and<br />
transmission construction led to the emergence<br />
<strong>of</strong> local monopolies in the form <strong>of</strong> franchises responsible<br />
for discrete geographic service. The requirements<br />
to balance loads and ensure reliability<br />
<strong>of</strong> supply led to the development <strong>of</strong> an interconnected<br />
system. By the 1950s, the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />
U.S. power demand was served by the electric utility<br />
industry with the exception <strong>of</strong> a small number<br />
<strong>of</strong> industries that continued to rely on self generation.<br />
Driven by inexpensive fuels and unlimited<br />
capacity growth, electricity generation grew by<br />
an average <strong>of</strong> 6.5 percent per year from 1950 to<br />
1960 and by an average <strong>of</strong> 7.5 per year from 1960<br />
to 1970, creating a robust demand for the output<br />
<strong>of</strong> the central station power system. 3 As the system<br />
grew, the laws and regulations designed to<br />
3 “The Changing Structure <strong>of</strong> the Electric Power Industry 2000: An Update,” Office <strong>of</strong> Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. <strong>Energy</strong><br />
Information Administration, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>, October 2000. p. 114.<br />
4 Richard Hirsch, “Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry,” Cambridge University Press, 2003<br />
aSSESSIng THE ROlE OF dISTRIBuTEd POwER SySTEmS In THE u.S. POwER SECTOR<br />
4<br />
protect the consumer from the natural monopolies<br />
helped to expand the centralized grid model.<br />
The Move to Decentralized Generation<br />
The trends in operating efficiency, cost and size<br />
that supported a centralized power system have<br />
leveled out over the past 40 years. Beginning in<br />
the 1970s, the electric utility industry changed<br />
from one characterized by decreasing marginal<br />
costs to one <strong>of</strong> increasing costs. 4 The energy crises<br />
and oil price shocks at the beginning and end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 1970s, stricter air quality regulations, rising<br />
interest rates and escalating costs <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />
power led to increased costs <strong>of</strong> building largescale<br />
power plants, while a drop-<strong>of</strong>f in the rates<br />
<strong>of</strong> electricity demand growth made the case for<br />
new additions <strong>of</strong> such plants less attractive. At the<br />
same time, the market for non-utility generation<br />
also began to open up. The National <strong>Energy</strong> Act<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1978, which encompassed the Public Utility<br />
Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) was enacted<br />
to address a nationwide energy crisis. PURPA<br />
heralded a new era <strong>of</strong> distributed generators by<br />
enabling small power producers to sell generation<br />
from “qualifying facilities, or QFs” to utilities<br />
without discrimination. Qualifying facilities