Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/ 7 - 28 -Volume INATO PAPS Project PhasesIRSG.14 Life Cycle Phases 4Preliminary system studies Opertional requiremeSystem concept formulation Pe imiar system concepyt cSystem definitionSystem concept validation 1 seficationSystem design andProduction drawings & specificationsdevelopment .=System production Operational man:machine system . jSystem operational reportSystem operational use19 2gS 3 4*§S 5.] 6g 7$tsNATO PAPS ProductsNcXDFigure 2.10:Products of the system life cycle phasesNATO UNCLASSIFIED- 28 -
NATO UNCLASSIFIED- 29 - AC/243(Panel-8)TR/7Volume 1.'-4jbcomnes*1 *46. As discussed in Chapter 1, the systems and equipment development processmoves through a series of phases or stages. The major phases in system or equipmentdevelopment and their associated products are shown in Figure 2.10. The various humanengineering analysis techniques are used in the different project phases as the system conceptmore fully defined. A major concern of the study was to identify effective techniquesauid to avoid applications which provide a low return on the effort invested in them. Therefore,* ASG representatives assessed the applicability of different human engineering techniques to fourdifferent types of system. These were:* simple (e.g., a rifle or hand-held radio)* medium-complexity (e.g., a one-person radar console)high-complexity single-operator (e.g., a single-seat attack aircraft)* high-complexity multi-operator (e.g., a ship's combat information centre)Using a consensus buliding technique, the responses were categorized as:* "Not Recommended" (N/R)$.0 * Low""Medium" or* "High"The pattern of responses shown in Table 2.3 is not unexpected. For simple systems, there is a4 recommendation to use only a few techniques. such as a narrative mission description andinformation-action tables or operational sequence diagrams. With growing complexity a largernumber of more complicated techniques is recommended. Available techniques for functionallocation are not highly recommended, because of their limitations.i'X47. Not all analysis techniques are relevant to all phases. Table 2.3 shows the overallopinion of the group, obtained through the same consensus building technique, rating thetechniques for various project phases. The phases used were reduced to four principle ones:* preliminary system studies* concept formulation and validation* design and development* system useThe effectiveness of an application depends on the system complexity and the characteristics of atechnique. As shown in the table, in most cases the effective use is limited to only one or twophases.NATOUNCLASSIFIED-29 -
- Page 1 and 2: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDNORTH ATLANTIC TRE
- Page 3 and 4: N A T OU N C L A S S I F I E DREPOR
- Page 6 and 7: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 8 and 9: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC1243(Pane1-8)TRf
- Page 10 and 11: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRf
- Page 12 and 13: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 14 and 15: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR[
- Page 16 and 17: NATO UNCLAS S IFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)T
- Page 18 and 19: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panel-8)=RJ
- Page 20 and 21: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panei-8)TR1
- Page 22 and 23: NATO UNCLASSIFIED-143tPanei-8)Tw7n3
- Page 24 and 25: NATO UJNCLASS IFTEDACt243(Panei-8)T
- Page 26 and 27: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDIAC243(Panei-8)=Vo
- Page 28 and 29: NAT O UNCLAS SIFTEDAC/3(Panel-8 7 -
- Page 30 and 31: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDACP-43gne-)TRj714
- Page 32 and 33: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRL
- Page 34 and 35: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRn
- Page 36 and 37: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDrAC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 38 and 39: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Pane1-8)TR/
- Page 40 and 41: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel- 8)TR
- Page 42 and 43: AC/243(Panei-8)TR/7- 26 -Volume ist
- Page 46 and 47: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 48 and 49: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 50 and 51: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 52 and 53: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDI! -.\Cf2 3(Panei-
- Page 54 and 55: NATO UNCLASSIFIED"AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 56 and 57: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDACT243(Palel- 8 TR
- Page 58 and 59: NATO UNCLASSIFTED,AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 60 and 61: NATO UNCLASSIFIED 7ACP'_43(PaneI-8)
- Page 62 and 63: NATO UNCLASSIFIED.AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 64 and 65: NATO UNCLASSIFIED QAC/243(Pafnel-8'
- Page 66 and 67: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8Y)1=
- Page 68 and 69: NATO UNC LAS SIFIE.DAC/243(Panel-8)
- Page 70 and 71: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC,243(Panel-8)TRt
- Page 72 and 73: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR1
- Page 74 and 75: I1.AC/243(Panei-89)TRP.Volume INATO
- Page 76 and 77: AC/243(Panel-87TR/7Volume I- 60 -Ta
- Page 78 and 79: NATO UNCLASSI.FIEULACP243(Panel-8)T
- Page 80 and 81: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR1
- Page 82 and 83: NATO UNCLAS SIFIEDAC8243(Pane1-8)TR
- Page 84 and 85: NATO UNCLASSI-ItLAC/243(Panei-8)TR1
- Page 86 and 87: NATO UNCLASSIFIED.,AC1243(Panel-8)T
- Page 88 and 89: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDACM43(Panel-g)T1-7
- Page 90 and 91: NATO UINCLASSII ri.uACP243(Panei-8)
- Page 92 and 93: NATO UNCLASSIFtiEUACI243(Panei-8)TR
NATO UNCLASSIFIED- 29 - AC/243(Panel-8)TR/7Volume 1.'-4jbcomnes*1 *46. As discussed in Chapter 1, the systems and equipment development processmoves through a series of phases or stages. The major phases in system or equipmentdevelopment and their associated products are shown in Figure 2.10. The various humanengineering analysis techniques are used in the different project phases as the system conceptmore fully defined. A major concern of the study was to identify effective techniquesauid to avoid applications which provide a low return on the effort invested in them. Therefore,* ASG representatives assessed the applicability of different human engineering techniques to fourdifferent types of system. These were:* simple (e.g., a rifle or hand-held radio)* medium-complexity (e.g., a one-person radar console)high-complexity single-operator (e.g., a single-seat attack aircraft)* high-complexity multi-operator (e.g., a ship's combat information centre)Using a consensus buliding technique, the responses were categorized as:* "Not Recommended" (N/R)$.0 * Low""Medium" or* "High"The pattern of responses shown in Table 2.3 is not unexpected. <strong>For</strong> simple systems, there is a4 recommendation to use only a few techniques. such as a narrative mission description andinformation-action tables or operational sequence diagrams. With growing complexity a largernumber of more complicated techniques is recommended. Available techniques for functionallocation are not highly recommended, because of their limitations.i'X47. Not all analysis techniques are relevant to all phases. Table 2.3 shows the overallopinion of the group, obtained through the same consensus building technique, rating thetechniques for various project phases. The phases used were reduced to four principle ones:* preliminary system studies* concept formulation and validation* design and development* system useThe effectiveness of an application depends on the system complexity and the characteristics of atechnique. As shown in the table, in most cases the effective use is limited to only one or twophases.NATOUNCLASSIFIED-29 -