Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
NATO UNCLASSIFIEDACP-43gne-)TRj714 -This page left blank intentionallyM A T(to u-N-C-1.A &M EI)rE
NATO UNCLASSIFIED-15- AC/243(Panel-8)TRnVolume ISURVEY AND REVIEWCHAPTER 2OF ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES2.1 SURVEY OF USE OF HUMAN ENGINEERING ANALYSISTECHNIQUES23. To conduct the survey, human engineering analyses techniques identified inavailable human engineering guides and regulatory documents were categorized into one of fivesequential stages of analysis. These stages were: Mission Analysis, Function Analysis, FunctionAllocation, Task Analysis, and Performance Prediction (Fig. 2.1). Twenty-four techniquesdescribed in human engineering guides were identified and assigned to one of these stages ofanalysis. The project phases used by the RSG member nations were identified itd used todevelop a common, five-phase, project development cycle. The phases were: Analysis ofExisting Systems, Planning New Systems, Preliminary Design, Design, and Test & Evaluation.The five categories (stages) of human engineering analvsis technique and the five project phaseswere used to create an applications matrix (Table 2.1). A questionnaire was issued to companiesand organizations known to employ human factors specialists in the seven participating nations,asking them to identify those human engineering analysis techniques used in specific weaponssystem development projects, and to comment on their effectiveness, ease of use, and so on.mission 8 &scenario \~ >F e :ranalysis--function .,-analysisfunctionallocationnanalysis --performancepredictionFigure 2.11:Stages of human engineering analysis24. Responses were obtained for a total of 33 acquisition or development projects in theRSG member nations in which at least one of the 24 human engineering analysis techniques hadbeen used. The projects included a wide variety of military systems: an infantry air defencesystem, tanks, aircraft, ships, submarines, and command and control systems. (No data wereincluded from projects which did not use any human engineering techniques, as adding such datawould reduce the sampled rate of application of each technique.) The rate and pattern of use ofthe human engineering techniques was found to differ widely between nations and betweenNATO UNCLASSIFIED- 15 -
- Page 1 and 2: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDNORTH ATLANTIC TRE
- Page 3 and 4: N A T OU N C L A S S I F I E DREPOR
- Page 6 and 7: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 8 and 9: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC1243(Pane1-8)TRf
- Page 10 and 11: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRf
- Page 12 and 13: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 14 and 15: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR[
- Page 16 and 17: NATO UNCLAS S IFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)T
- Page 18 and 19: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panel-8)=RJ
- Page 20 and 21: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panei-8)TR1
- Page 22 and 23: NATO UNCLASSIFIED-143tPanei-8)Tw7n3
- Page 24 and 25: NATO UJNCLASS IFTEDACt243(Panei-8)T
- Page 26 and 27: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDIAC243(Panei-8)=Vo
- Page 28 and 29: NAT O UNCLAS SIFTEDAC/3(Panel-8 7 -
- Page 32 and 33: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRL
- Page 34 and 35: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TRn
- Page 36 and 37: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDrAC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 38 and 39: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Pane1-8)TR/
- Page 40 and 41: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel- 8)TR
- Page 42 and 43: AC/243(Panei-8)TR/7- 26 -Volume ist
- Page 44 and 45: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 46 and 47: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 48 and 49: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 50 and 51: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR/
- Page 52 and 53: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDI! -.\Cf2 3(Panei-
- Page 54 and 55: NATO UNCLASSIFIED"AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 56 and 57: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDACT243(Palel- 8 TR
- Page 58 and 59: NATO UNCLASSIFTED,AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 60 and 61: NATO UNCLASSIFIED 7ACP'_43(PaneI-8)
- Page 62 and 63: NATO UNCLASSIFIED.AC/243(Panel-8)TR
- Page 64 and 65: NATO UNCLASSIFIED QAC/243(Pafnel-8'
- Page 66 and 67: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8Y)1=
- Page 68 and 69: NATO UNC LAS SIFIE.DAC/243(Panel-8)
- Page 70 and 71: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC,243(Panel-8)TRt
- Page 72 and 73: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel-8)TR1
- Page 74 and 75: I1.AC/243(Panei-89)TRP.Volume INATO
- Page 76 and 77: AC/243(Panel-87TR/7Volume I- 60 -Ta
- Page 78 and 79: NATO UNCLASSI.FIEULACP243(Panel-8)T
NATO UNCLASSIFIED-15- AC/243(Panel-8)TRnVolume ISURVEY AND REVIEWCHAPTER 2OF ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES2.1 SURVEY OF USE OF HUMAN ENGINEERING ANALYSISTECHNIQUES23. To conduct the survey, human engineering analyses techniques identified inavailable human engineering guides and regulatory documents were categorized into one of fivesequential stages of analysis. These stages were: Mission <strong>Analysis</strong>, Function <strong>Analysis</strong>, FunctionAllocation, Task <strong>Analysis</strong>, and Performance Prediction (Fig. 2.1). Twenty-four techniquesdescribed in human engineering guides were identified and assigned to one of these stages ofanalysis. The project phases used by the RSG member nations were identified itd used todevelop a common, five-phase, project development cycle. The phases were: <strong>Analysis</strong> ofExisting <strong>Systems</strong>, Planning New <strong>Systems</strong>, Preliminary <strong>Design</strong>, <strong>Design</strong>, and Test & Evaluation.The five categories (stages) of human engineering analvsis technique and the five project phaseswere used to create an applications matrix (Table 2.1). A questionnaire was issued to companiesand organizations known to employ human factors specialists in the seven participating nations,asking them to identify those human engineering analysis techniques used in specific weaponssystem development projects, and to comment on their effectiveness, ease of use, and so on.mission 8 &scenario \~ >F e :ranalysis--function .,-analysisfunctionallocationnanalysis --performancepredictionFigure 2.11:Stages of human engineering analysis24. Responses were obtained for a total of 33 acquisition or development projects in theRSG member nations in which at least one of the 24 human engineering analysis techniques hadbeen used. The projects included a wide variety of military systems: an infantry air defencesystem, tanks, aircraft, ships, submarines, and command and control systems. (No data wereincluded from projects which did not use any human engineering techniques, as adding such datawould reduce the sampled rate of application of each technique.) The rate and pattern of use ofthe human engineering techniques was found to differ widely between nations and betweenNATO UNCLASSIFIED- 15 -