Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/ 24 3 (Pane l 8 ' TR/ 7Volume 2an application to the design of a prototype radar using the standard sequence for operating the equipment (a widelycited example by Cornell (1968) was actually an hypothetical application). Link analysis was used to evaluatecompeting human-machine interface designs during the sele.ion of a maritime patrol aircrafL Recently the techniquewas used for the development of interface designs for a forwari air defence system. Link analysis has also been usedwidely in crew compartment design, for example for patrol aircraft, for army command posts, and for the developmcntof improved designs of destroyer bridges.Quality assurance considerationsThe analysis is dependent on the frequencies and weightings used to weight the different links. The weightings aresubjective.Relationship to system performancerequirementsOperator performance is implicit in the use of the "cost" function to determine the arrangement of systemcomponents, resulting in reduced operator times, and errors. The cost function chosen will determine the exactrelationship to system performance.Referencesand Bibliography1. Cornel, C.E. (1968). Minimizing human errors. SpaceIAeronatlics. March, p. 79 .2. Evans, S., Walker, C., & Beevis, D. (1984). A human enrinecrinl evaluation of DDH28O bridge designpr9oal. DCIEM No. 84-R-43. Toronto: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.3. Freund, L.E. & Sadosky, TL. (1967). Linear programming applied to optimization of instrument panel andworkplace layout. Human Factors 2(4), 295-300.4. Hendy, K. (1989). A model for human-machine-human interactions in workspace layout problems. HumanEactors31. ( 5 ). 593-610.5. Laughery, K-R. Snr., & Laughery, K.R. Jr. (1987). Analytic techniques for function analysis. In: G. Salvendy(Ed.), Handbook of human factors. New York: John Wiley & Sons.6 Shackel, B. (1961). Ergonomics in equipment design. Instrument Practice. June.. pp. 705-712.7. Siegel. A.I., Wolf, JJ., & Pilitis, J. (1982). A new method for the scientific layout of workspaces. AUplicdErgonomics 13 (2), 87-90.8. US Department of Defense (1987). Human eneineering Drocdures tuide. Washington D.C.: DoD-HDBK-763.9. Wierwille, W.W. (1981). Statistical techniques for instrument panel arrangement. In: J. Moraal & K.F. Kraiss(Eds.), Manned system desiin. New York: Plenum Press.NATO UNCLASSIFIED1do
NATO UNCLASSIFIED- 1 -- AC/243(Panel-8)TR/7Volume 2VOLUME 2 PART 2DECOMPOSITION AND REPRESENTATIONOF SYSTEMSNATOUNCLASSIFIED1 -
- Page 192 and 193: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 194 and 195: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 196 and 197: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8')TR
- Page 198 and 199: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8ITR/
- Page 200 and 201: NATO UNCLASSIFIUEUAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 202 and 203: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 204 and 205: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 206 and 207: t NATO UNCLASSIFlEDAC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 208 and 209: NATO UNoCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 210 and 211: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 212 and 213: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 214 and 215: NATO UN CL A S SIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8
- Page 216 and 217: NATO UNCLAS.SIFI.EDAC/243(Panei 8Vo
- Page 218 and 219: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 220 and 221: fl1106AC/243(Panel 8'TR/7- 106Volum
- Page 222 and 223: NATO UNCLASSIFIED -AC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 224 and 225: .N AI U N C L A Itt110iAC/243(Panel
- Page 226 and 227: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 228 and 229: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 230 and 231: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 232 and 233: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 234 and 235: ] NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 236 and 237: VNATO UNCLASSIFIED;-AC/243(Panel 8'
- Page 238 and 239: NATO UNCLASSIFIED1111wAC/243(Panel
- Page 240 and 241: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 244 and 245: NATo I UNCLASSIFEDAC/243(Panel 8'IT
- Page 246 and 247: NATO ITNCLASSIUI:EDAC/243(panel 81T
- Page 248 and 249: NATO U.NCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 250 and 251: NATO INCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel- 8LTR
- Page 252 and 253: NATO I rNC'LASSTFIEDAC/243(Panel 82
- Page 254 and 255: NATONTCLaSSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8\TR/7
- Page 256 and 257: NATO UNCLASSIiE:DAC/243(Panel 8Y1TR
- Page 258 and 259: o ndesel pre-lubrication (D)compres
- Page 260 and 261: NATO I rNCT-AS S ITfEDAC/243(Panel
- Page 262 and 263: NATO ITNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 264 and 265: NATO IrNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 266 and 267: NATO UINCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 268 and 269: NATO) I INCI.ASSllHTlDAC/243(Panel
- Page 270 and 271: o n* (D L4COP1RORDIAm CTiMMINCA1-CO
- Page 272 and 273: (DREFI..11.1 ,CC) WEATHE RDATAft EN
- Page 274 and 275: NATO tTNC>LAM0-~E-DC/4(ae TR7 32Vo
- Page 276 and 277: NATO UNCLASSIF"EDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 278 and 279: NATO U NCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 280 and 281: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 282 and 283: NATO ITNCLASSIFBEDAC/243(Panel 8Vol
- Page 284 and 285: NATO I\NCiASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 286 and 287: NATO uTNCLASSM EDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 288 and 289: NATO I TNCIASSIFLEDAC/243(Panel 8'l
- Page 290 and 291: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/ 24 3 (Pane l 8 ' TR/ 7Volume 2an application to the design of a prototype radar using the standard sequence for operating the equipment (a widelycited example by Cornell (1968) was actually an hypothetical application). Link analysis was used to evaluatecompeting human-machine interface designs during the sele.ion of a maritime patrol aircrafL Recently the techniquewas used for the development of interface designs for a forwari air defence system. Link analysis has also been usedwidely in crew compartment design, for example for patrol aircraft, for army command posts, and for the developmcntof improved designs of destroyer bridges.Quality assurance considerationsThe analysis is dependent on the frequencies and weightings used to weight the different links. The weightings aresubjective.Relationship to system performancerequirementsOperator performance is implicit in the use of the "cost" function to determine the arrangement of systemcomponents, resulting in reduced operator times, and errors. The cost function chosen will determine the exactrelationship to system performance.Referencesand Bibliography1. Cornel, C.E. (1968). Minimizing human errors. SpaceIAeronatlics. March, p. 79 .2. Evans, S., Walker, C., & Beevis, D. (1984). A human enrinecrinl evaluation of DDH28O bridge designpr9oal. DCIEM No. 84-R-43. Toronto: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.3. Freund, L.E. & Sadosky, TL. (1967). Linear programming applied to optimization of instrument panel andworkplace layout. Human Factors 2(4), 295-300.4. Hendy, K. (1989). A model for human-machine-human interactions in workspace layout problems. HumanEactors31. ( 5 ). 593-610.5. Laughery, K-R. Snr., & Laughery, K.R. Jr. (1987). Analytic techniques for function analysis. In: G. Salvendy(Ed.), Handbook of human factors. New York: John Wiley & Sons.6 Shackel, B. (1961). Ergonomics in equipment design. Instrument Practice. June.. pp. 705-712.7. Siegel. A.I., Wolf, JJ., & Pilitis, J. (1982). A new method for the scientific layout of workspaces. AUplicdErgonomics 13 (2), 87-90.8. US Department of Defense (1987). Human eneineering Drocdures tuide. Washington D.C.: DoD-HDBK-763.9. Wierwille, W.W. (1981). Statistical techniques for instrument panel arrangement. In: J. Moraal & K.F. Kraiss(Eds.), <strong>Man</strong>ned system desiin. New York: Plenum Press.NATO UNCLASSIFIED1do